Compare Buffer vs. Planable

Summary

AI Generated Summary

AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.

Users report that Buffer excels in its "Social Publishing" feature, scoring 9.3, which allows for seamless scheduling across multiple platforms, while Planable's score of 9.1 indicates a slightly less robust experience in this area.
Reviewers mention that Planable's "Approval Workflows" feature stands out with a score of 9.0, providing a more structured process for content approval compared to Buffer's score of 8.6, which some users find less comprehensive.
G2 users highlight that Buffer's "Social Analytics" feature, with a score of 7.9, could benefit from more in-depth insights, whereas Planable's lower score of 7.1 suggests that both platforms may need improvement in this area, but Buffer is perceived as slightly better.
Users on G2 appreciate Buffer's "Content Calendar" feature, scoring 9.2, for its user-friendly interface that simplifies content planning, while Planable's similar score of 9.3 indicates it also offers a strong calendar feature, but users find Buffer's layout more intuitive.
Reviewers say that both platforms have comparable "Content Library" features, each scoring 8.7, but users report that Buffer's organization and tagging system is more effective for managing large volumes of content.
Users report that while both platforms offer "Users and Permissions" features with high scores (8.8 for Buffer and 8.9 for Planable), Planable is noted for providing more granular control over user roles, which some users find essential for team collaboration.

Compare Buffer and Planable