Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare AWS IoT and Sentry 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
UptimeRobot
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (44.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (47.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
AWS IoT
Star Rating
(106)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (44.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AWS IoTSentry
Star Rating
(123)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Sentry excels in Crash Monitoring with a score of 9.3, providing real-time insights into application errors, while AWS IoT's performance in this area is less emphasized, leading to a perception that it may not be as robust for developers focused on error tracking.
- Reviewers mention that Sentry's Alerting features, rated at 8.8, are highly customizable, allowing teams to set specific thresholds and notifications, whereas AWS IoT's alerting capabilities, rated at 8.3, are seen as more generalized and less tailored to individual user needs.
- G2 users highlight Sentry's User Reports and Feedback functionality, scoring 7.2, as a valuable tool for gathering user insights, while AWS IoT's similar feature is perceived as lacking depth, making it harder for teams to analyze user behavior effectively.
- Reviewers say that Sentry's Performance Monitoring capabilities, rated at 8.8, provide detailed insights into application performance, which is crucial for developers, while AWS IoT's performance metrics are seen as more focused on device management rather than application-level insights.
- Users on G2 report that Sentry's Integrations score of 9.3 reflects its ability to seamlessly connect with various development tools, enhancing workflow efficiency, whereas AWS IoT, while offering integrations, is noted to be less extensive in comparison.
- Reviewers mention that Sentry's Real User Monitoring (RUM) feature, rated at 8.7, provides granular insights into user interactions, which is crucial for optimizing user experience, while AWS IoT's monitoring capabilities are more focused on device performance rather than user engagement.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS IoT
No pricing availableSentry
Developer
Free
For solo devs working on small projects
- 5k events/month
- 1 user
- 30 day history
Free Trial
AWS IoT
No trial information availableSentry
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
61
9.0
101
Ease of Use
8.5
61
8.7
104
Ease of Setup
8.0
30
8.6
54
Ease of Admin
8.3
30
8.8
35
Quality of Support
8.8
58
8.5
74
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
29
8.9
28
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
60
9.2
102
Features by Category
User Behavior
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
A/B Testing
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Visitor Information
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Agentic AI - Session Replay
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
7.6
9
Agentic AI - Website Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Experience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
7.5
36
Not enough data
7.4
35
Not enough data
8.0
40
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.7
41
Not enough data
8.9
45
Not enough data
8.2
41
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Crash Monitoring
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
7.4
11
Crash Data
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Metrics
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
6.7
8
Not enough data
6.3
8
Visibility
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
8.4
16
Not enough data
9.0
16
Monitoring and Management
Not enough data
7.8
15
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
8.7
14
Agentic AI - Log Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.2
13
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
9.5
14
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.6
14
Not enough data
8.1
14
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
6.9
16
Not enough data
8.5
19
Response
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.1
19
Agentic AI - Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
8.7
18
Not enough data
7.7
17
Functionality
Not enough data
7.3
16
Not enough data
7.8
15
Not enough data
5.5
13
Not enough data
6.8
14
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - IT Alerting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Metrics
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
6.7
8
Not enough data
6.3
8
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AWS IoT and Sentry are categorized as IoT Development Tools
Unique Categories
AWS IoT has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AWS IoT
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Sentry
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
15.9%
Computer Software
15.9%
Marketing and Advertising
5.7%
Computer & Network Security
4.5%
Telecommunications
3.4%
Other
54.5%
Computer Software
29.8%
Information Technology and Services
19.0%
Internet
9.1%
Financial Services
4.1%
Logistics and Supply Chain
3.3%
Other
34.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
AWS IoT has no discussions with answers
What is your primary use case for Sentry in application monitoring, and how has it impacted your development process?
1 Comment
JD
You can intergrate senty with your application to get the errors on your email or simply getting notified when your system fails or give you any kind of...Read more
Sentry has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
