ARC Facilities vs IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities (formerly IBM TRIRIGA)
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found ARC Facilities easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with ARC Facilities overall.
Reviewers felt that ARC Facilities meets the needs of their business better than IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities (formerly IBM TRIRIGA).
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that ARC Facilities is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of ARC Facilities over IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities (formerly IBM TRIRIGA).
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ARC Facilities
No pricing available
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities (formerly IBM TRIRIGA)
No pricing available
Free Trial
ARC Facilities
Free Trial is available
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities (formerly IBM TRIRIGA)
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
27
7.6
106
Ease of Use
8.3
33
6.3
105
Ease of Setup
9.2
15
5.8
66
Ease of Admin
9.3
9
6.7
66
Quality of Support
9.1
29
6.4
100
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities (formerly IBM TRIRIGA) Discussions
Why does this system lack so much integrity?
1 Comment
AL
I understand your frustration. I have worked with the product for 15+ years. TRIRIGA is highly configurable, so finding an implementation partner whose...Read more
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities (formerly IBM TRIRIGA) has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.