When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found ProcessMaker easier to use and do business with overall. However, reviewers preferred the ease of set up with webMethods BPM, along with administration.
Reviewers felt that ProcessMaker meets the needs of their business better than webMethods BPM.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that ProcessMaker is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of ProcessMaker over webMethods BPM.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ProcessMaker
Professional
Contact Us
Per Year
Scale your workflow automations across your entire organization
Does process maker have an integration with Google Docs?
2 Comments
RA
I saw a webinar about a year ago which showed very cool integration to google mail and tasks on the Enterprise version. I haven't seen anything on Google...Read more
What are the three key components of a BPM system?
1 Comment
JS
BPM (Business Process Management) tools are designed to help companies manage their workflows by providing a platform where Project Managers...Read more
Does this integrate with SAP B1?
1 Comment
AV
Yes, ProcessMaker can integrate with any other third party system using REST API's. Can you share with us your contact information in order to set up a call...Read more
Whys sag bpm is not as robust as its competitors . Also why its not as user friendly for developers
1 Comment
AS
Their BPM server is very heavy as compared to their peers. Also all bpm components are tightly coupled and its error handling is not at all developer...Read more
webMethods BPM has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.