Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Neo4j Graph Database and Titan 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (45.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Neo4j Graph Database
Star Rating
(133)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Learn more about Neo4j Graph DatabaseTitan
Star Rating
(11)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TitanSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Neo4j Graph Database excels in ease of use with a score of 8.2, while Titan struggles with a lower score of 6.4, making Neo4j a more user-friendly option for those new to graph databases.
- Reviewers mention that Neo4j's query language is highly regarded, scoring 8.2, which allows for more intuitive data retrieval compared to Titan's lower performance in this area, where users have noted challenges in query optimization with a score of 7.3.
- G2 users highlight Neo4j's strong support quality, rated at 8.5, as a significant advantage, whereas Titan's support quality is rated at 7.0, indicating that users may face more difficulties in resolving issues quickly with Titan.
- Users on G2 appreciate Neo4j's robust data modeling capabilities, scoring 7.7, which allows for more complex relationships and structures, while Titan's data model features are perceived as less flexible, leading to potential limitations in advanced use cases.
- Reviewers say that Neo4j's built-in search functionality, rated at 8.0, enhances the user experience by simplifying data discovery, whereas Titan's search capabilities are not as well-received, leading to frustrations among users trying to locate specific data points.
- Users report that Neo4j's product direction is highly positive, with a score of 9.0, indicating a strong commitment to innovation and user feedback, while Titan's score of 8.9 suggests a slightly less proactive approach to product development.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Neo4j Graph Database
AuraDB Free
Free
A fully-managed graph database for free; no commitment required.
- console.neo4j.io
Titan
No pricing availableFree Trial
Neo4j Graph Database
Free Trial is available
Titan
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
73
8.5
11
Ease of Use
8.2
75
6.4
11
Ease of Setup
8.7
31
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.0
28
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.5
64
7.0
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
24
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
68
8.9
11
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
7.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
Availability
7.1
12
Not enough data
6.9
13
Not enough data
Performance
7.4
19
Not enough data
Security
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
7.1
14
Not enough data
Support
7.2
15
Not enough data
6.2
15
Not enough data
7.7
17
Not enough data
Configuration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Neo4j Graph Database and Titan are categorized as Graph Databases
Unique Categories
Neo4j Graph Database is categorized as Database Management Systems (DBMS) and Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Titan has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Neo4j Graph Database
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Titan
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.2%
Information Technology and Services
16.8%
Internet
5.3%
Telecommunications
4.6%
Marketing and Advertising
3.1%
Other
45.0%
Computer Software
36.4%
Internet
18.2%
Retail
9.1%
Primary/Secondary Education
9.1%
Management Consulting
9.1%
Other
18.2%
Discussions
What is neo4j good for?
2 Comments
MR
For the simple friends of friends query, Neo4j is 60% faster than MySQL. For friends of friends of friends, Neo is 180 times faster. And for the depth four...Read more
Is neo4j enterprise free?
2 Comments
JJ
If you are a student aiming to be acquire new-age data science skills; enroll for an academic course and you can use it for free for certification purposes. Read more
What companies use neo4j?
1 Comment
Official Response from Neo4j Graph Database
Great question. This page https://neo4j.com/customers/ has a shortlist of referenceable customers. Comcast, eBay, Adobe, and Microsoft, to name a few. Read more
Titan has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
