Users report that Parse.ly excels in real-time reporting with a score of 9.3, allowing teams to make immediate data-driven decisions, while Marfeel's real-time reporting is slightly lower at 8.1, which may impact timely insights.
Reviewers mention that Parse.ly's content management features are robust, scoring 9.2, which helps streamline the content creation process, whereas Marfeel's content management is rated lower at 8.2, indicating potential limitations in this area.
G2 users highlight that Parse.ly offers superior session tracking with a score of 9.2, providing detailed insights into user engagement, while Marfeel's session tracking is rated at 8.7, which may not capture as much detail.
Users on G2 say that Parse.ly's audience insights feature is highly rated at 8.7, enabling better understanding of user behavior, compared to Marfeel's audience insights score of 8.1, which may not provide as comprehensive data.
Reviewers mention that Parse.ly's ease of use is rated at 9.0, making it user-friendly for teams, while Marfeel's ease of use is slightly lower at 8.9, which could affect user adoption and training time.
Users report that Parse.ly's quality of support is rated at 8.6, indicating a strong support system, while Marfeel's support is rated lower at 8.0, which may lead to longer resolution times for issues.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Marfeel
Real-time
Free
Real-time content analytics for organizations getting started.
How do I find the search terms that bring us google traffic?
1 Comment
Official Response from Parse.ly
There aren't specific search terms inside of Parse.ly as of today. That said, because it pulls content tags directly from your CMS, you can understand topic...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.