Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IFTTT and Jitterbit 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
1 EDI Source, an Epicor solution
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
MindCloud
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (71.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (51.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Contact Us
IFTTT
Star Rating
(114)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (71.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plansJitterbit
Star Rating
(583)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Jitterbit excels in Data Migration with a score of 9.0, highlighting its robust capabilities in transferring data seamlessly between systems. In contrast, IFTTT, while effective, has a slightly lower score of 8.9 in this area, indicating it may not be as comprehensive for complex migrations.
- Reviewers mention that Jitterbit's Quality of Support is a standout feature, scoring 9.1, which users attribute to responsive and knowledgeable assistance. On the other hand, IFTTT's support, rated at 8.4, is seen as adequate but not as proactive or detailed, leading to mixed experiences among users.
- G2 users highlight Jitterbit's superior Real-Time Integration capabilities with a score of 8.8, allowing for immediate data updates across platforms. IFTTT, with a score of 7.9, is noted for its automation but lacks the same level of immediacy, which can be a drawback for users needing instant data synchronization.
- Users on G2 report that Jitterbit's Customization options are highly rated at 8.8, enabling businesses to tailor the software to their specific needs. In contrast, IFTTT's customization features, rated at 7.6, are seen as more limited, which may restrict users looking for more personalized solutions.
- Reviewers mention that Jitterbit's Scalability is a key advantage, scoring 9.1, making it suitable for mid-market businesses looking to grow. IFTTT, while effective for small businesses, scores lower at 8.1, which may pose challenges for users planning to scale their operations significantly.
- Users say that Jitterbit's Application Deployment is rated at 9.0, praised for its ease and efficiency in getting applications up and running. IFTTT, with a score of 9.1, also performs well in this area, but users note that Jitterbit offers more comprehensive deployment options for complex integrations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IFTTT
Free
Free
Get started with automation.
- 2 Applets
- Standard Applet speeds
- DIY or use published Applets
Jitterbit
Standard
Contact Us
An entry-level solution for businesses looking to synchronize applications.
Free Trial
IFTTT
Free Trial is available
Jitterbit
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
99
8.9
461
Ease of Use
8.9
99
8.6
459
Ease of Setup
8.2
21
8.4
337
Ease of Admin
8.9
19
8.7
333
Quality of Support
8.4
44
9.0
436
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
16
9.2
332
Product Direction (% positive)
7.9
98
8.7
434
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
9.2
26
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
9.1
25
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
27
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
9.1
27
Development
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
18
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
25
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
65
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
64
|
Verified
Management
Not enough data
8.3
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.6
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
61
|
Verified
Integrations
Not enough data
8.7
58
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
42
Security
Not enough data
8.4
54
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
52
|
Verified
Support
Not enough data
8.5
49
|
Verified
Development
8.1
20
8.8
148
8.0
5
8.4
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
37
|
Verified
9.0
5
8.0
40
|
Verified
9.0
5
7.4
39
|
Verified
9.3
5
8.4
38
Not enough data
8.0
32
Management
9.3
5
7.7
40
|
Verified
8.3
5
8.2
37
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
42
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
42
|
Verified
9.0
5
8.1
37
Security
Not enough data
8.4
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
36
|
Verified
8.3
5
8.6
34
|
Verified
Integration Options
9.3
5
8.4
33
8.0
5
8.4
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
28
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
26
|
Verified
Deployment
Not enough data
8.4
31
8.3
5
8.5
31
Functionality
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
7.8
25
Not enough data
7.5
17
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
7.7
26
Not enough data
7.0
23
Not enough data
7.9
25
Application Design
Not enough data
8.0
70
Not enough data
7.8
65
Not enough data
8.5
79
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
74
Data Control
Not enough data
9.0
75
Not enough data
8.8
78
Not enough data
8.9
70
Publishing
Not enough data
8.8
75
Not enough data
8.7
78
Not enough data
8.8
75
Agentic AI - Low-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Interface Design
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
56
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
52
Data Control
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
9.0
54
Not enough data
9.2
48
Publishing
Not enough data
9.0
54
Not enough data
8.8
52
Not enough data
8.9
51
Agentic AI - No-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
Not enough data
8.5
62
Not enough data
8.2
57
Not enough data
8.4
57
Not enough data
8.1
59
API Management
Not enough data
8.1
55
Not enough data
7.9
59
Not enough data
8.2
58
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.9
50
Data Integration
Not enough data
8.3
57
Not enough data
8.7
57
Not enough data
7.9
51
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IFTTT and Jitterbit are categorized as iPaaS
Unique Categories
IFTTT is categorized as API Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IFTTT
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Jitterbit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Marketing and Advertising
12.5%
Information Technology and Services
11.6%
Writing and Editing
5.4%
Internet
5.4%
Design
5.4%
Other
59.8%
Information Technology and Services
12.1%
Financial Services
6.3%
Computer Software
6.3%
Retail
4.9%
Hospital & Health Care
4.5%
Other
65.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Can we publish all of our services at the same time?
1 Comment
Official Response from IFTTT
Yes, you may publish one or more service and Applets at the same time, depending on your needs.Read more
IFTTT has no more discussions with answers
What was the key moment that you realised the value of Vinyl?
1 Comment
RL
we were able to create quick websites within couple daysRead more
What is ZUDY vinyl?
1 Comment
MR
Zudy is the name of the company and Vinyl is the Software as a Service (SaaS) product they sell. It's kind of like saying Microsoft Word. Microsoft is a...Read more
Jitterbit has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
