Best Columnar Databases
SJ
Best Columnar Databases At A Glance
G2 takes pride in showing unbiased reviews on user satisfaction in our ratings and reports. We do not allow paid placements in any of our ratings, rankings, or reports. Learn about our scoring methodologies.
(1,224)4.5 out of 5
Entry Level Price:Free
1st Easiest To Use in Columnar Databases software
View top Consulting Services for Google Cloud BigQuery
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Speed, Fast Querying, Integrations, Query Efficiency
ConsExpensive, Query Issues, Cost Issues, Cost Management, Learning Curve
Google Cloud BigQuery features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.1
Data Model
Average: 8.7
8.8
Data Types
Average: 8.5
8.6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
8.5
Integrated Cache
Average: 8.5
Twitter
@google31,798,732 Twitter followers
Ownership
NASDAQ:GOOG(695)4.6 out of 5
Entry Level Price:$2 Compute/Hour
2nd Easiest To Use in Columnar Databases software
View top Consulting Services for Snowflake
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Scalability, Data Management, Features, Integrations
ConsExpensive, Cost, Cost Management, Learning Curve, Feature Limitations
Snowflake features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.2
Data Model
Average: 8.7
9.2
Data Types
Average: 8.5
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
9.2
Integrated Cache
Average: 8.5
HQ Location
San Mateo, CATwitter
@SnowflakeDB228 Twitter followers
Sponsored
G2 Advertising
Get 2x conversion than Google Ads with G2 Advertising!
G2 Advertising places your product in premium positions on high-traffic pages and on targeted competitor pages to reach buyers at key comparison moments.
(400)4.3 out of 5
Entry Level Price:$1.22 - $3.26 Per hour
3rd Easiest To Use in Columnar Databases software
View top Consulting Services for Amazon Redshift
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Integrations, Easy Integrations, Fast Querying, Scalability
ConsComplexity, Feature Limitations, Software Limitations, Query Issues, Query Optimization
Amazon Redshift features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.4
Data Model
Average: 8.7
8.4
Data Types
Average: 8.5
8.7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
8.2
Integrated Cache
Average: 8.5
Twitter
@awscloud2,220,322 Twitter followers
Ownership
NASDAQ: AMZNOverviewPros and Cons
ProsEasy Integrations, Integrations, Query Efficiency, Query Speed, Speed
ConsBeginner Unfriendliness, Complex Usage, Query Optimization, Required Expertise, Training Required
ClickHouse features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.2
Data Model
Average: 8.7
9.0
Data Types
Average: 8.5
10.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
8.1
Integrated Cache
Average: 8.5
Twitter
@ClickhouseDB15,785 Twitter followers
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, Easy Integrations, Query Speed, Backup Services, Connectivity
ConsBeginner Unfriendliness, Connectivity Issues, Difficult Learning, Error Handling, Feature Limitations
MariaDB features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.8
Data Model
Average: 8.7
8.9
Data Types
Average: 8.5
8.1
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
9.0
Integrated Cache
Average: 8.5
Twitter
@mariadb453,669 Twitter followers
Ownership
NYSE: MRDB
OverviewUser Satisfaction
OpenText Vertica features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.4
Data Model
Average: 8.7
8.0
Data Types
Average: 8.5
8.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
8.5
Integrated Cache
Average: 8.5
Twitter
@OpenText21,592 Twitter followers
Ownership
NASDAQ:OTEX
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsFast Querying, Features, Speed, Performance, Usability
ConsComplex Setup, Connectivity Issues, Limited Customization, Limited Features, Poor Documentation
MonetDB features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.6
Data Model
Average: 8.7
8.6
Data Types
Average: 8.5
8.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
8.3
Integrated Cache
Average: 8.5
Seller
MonetDBYear Founded
2013HQ Location
Amsterdam, NL
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsAnalytics, Fast Querying, Large Datasets, Performance, Big Data Handling
ConsLearning Curve, Complex Setup, Difficult Setup, Insufficient Documentation, Poor Documentation
StarTree features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.3
Data Model
Average: 8.7
8.1
Data Types
Average: 8.5
8.8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
8.7
Integrated Cache
Average: 8.5
HQ Location
Mountain View, CaliforniaTwitter
@startreedata2,262 Twitter followers
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsEase of Use, SQL Usage, Easy Integrations, Flexibility, Features
ConsLack of Features, Software Limitations, Limited Features, Poor Documentation, Complex Configuration
CrateDB features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.0
Data Model
Average: 8.7
9.2
Data Types
Average: 8.5
9.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
10.0
Integrated Cache
Average: 8.5
HQ Location
Redwood City, CATwitter
@cratedb4,187 Twitter followers
OverviewPros and Cons
ProsSpeed, Performance, Tool Power, Efficiency, Fast Processing
ConsLearning Curve, Difficult Learning, Steep Learning Curve, Complexity, Expensive
KX features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.8
Data Model
Average: 8.7
9.5
Data Types
Average: 8.5
9.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
9.1
Integrated Cache
Average: 8.5
Twitter
@kxsystems4,161 Twitter followers
OverviewUser Satisfaction
Apache Parquet features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.0
Data Model
Average: 8.7
8.8
Data Types
Average: 8.5
7.5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
8.6
Integrated Cache
Average: 8.5
Twitter
@TheASF66,061 Twitter followers
(114)4.2 out of 5
5th Easiest To Use in Columnar Databases software
OverviewUser Satisfaction
Hbase features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.1
Data Model
Average: 8.7
7.2
Data Types
Average: 8.5
8.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
7.0
Integrated Cache
Average: 8.5
Twitter
@TheASF66,061 Twitter followers
OverviewUser Satisfaction
Apache Kudu features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.7
Data Model
Average: 8.7
6.3
Data Types
Average: 8.5
8.3
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
7.3
Integrated Cache
Average: 8.5
Twitter
@TheASF66,061 Twitter followers
OverviewUser Satisfaction
Druid features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.8
Data Model
Average: 8.7
7.8
Data Types
Average: 8.5
7.7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
8.9
Integrated Cache
Average: 8.5
Twitter
@druid4 Twitter followers
OverviewUser Satisfaction
Apache ORC features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
0.0
No information available
0.0
No information available
8.0
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Average: 8.4
0.0
No information available
Twitter
@TheASF66,061 Twitter followers
Similar Categories
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
