Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Tiger Data
Sponsored
Tiger Data
Visit Website
Product Avatar Image
Apache Kudu

By The Apache Software Foundation

Unclaimed Profile

Claim your company’s G2 profile

Claiming this profile confirms that you work at Apache Kudu and allows you to manage how it appears on G2.

    Once approved, you can:

  • Update your company and product details

  • Boost your brand's visibility on G2, search and LLMs

  • Access insights on visitors and competitors

  • Respond to customer reviews

  • We’ll verify your work email before granting access.

Claim Now
4.1 out of 5 stars

How would you rate your experience with Apache Kudu?

Tiger Data
Sponsored
Tiger Data
Visit Website
It's been two months since this profile received a new review
Leave a Review

Apache Kudu Reviews & Product Details

Product Avatar Image

Have you used Apache Kudu before?

Answer a few questions to help the Apache Kudu community

Apache Kudu Reviews (13)

Reviews

Apache Kudu Reviews (13)

4.1
13 reviews

Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Satheesh V.
SV
Senior Solutions Architect
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Tryst With Kudu in Production Deployment for a Telco"
What do you like best about Apache Kudu?

1. Implementing Lambda Architecture (Both Batch & Real Time Streaming) with Kudu is quite straightforward. We additionally used Streamsets as the Ingestion Platform which has quite a good coupling with Kudu.

2. Makes Real Time Analytics Quite Starightforward. We used Kudu to run multiple Real Time Campaigns.

3. Tailor Made for Implementing Data Warehouses within a Big Data Environment.

4. Nice Upsert Functionality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Apache Kudu?

1. Partition Limitation - Is limited to 2000 tablets/tablet server.

2. Faces Random Timeouts while approaching the tablet number limitation (max 2000/server).

3. Needs a Conformed Schema. No automatic handling of drifting schemas.

4. Needs a Primary Key for every table.

5. #3 & #4 are not really cons per se. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Araceli M.
AM
Data Engineer
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"A good choice for efficient on-the-fly big data analytics + write random access"
What do you like best about Apache Kudu?

To my mind, what I found most helpful about Apache Kudu is the possibility to make quite complex data aggregations through SQL engines while also being able to efficiently perform updates Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Apache Kudu?

Probably two downsides of Apache Kudu to take into account are partitioning configuration, as it's quite hard to find the best partitioning set up for the particular use case performance, and also the fact that Kudu does not balance charge if a new node is added to the cluster. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Vikash S.
VS
Sr AIML & Data Engineer
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"I am happy with Kudu except for few exceptions."
What do you like best about Apache Kudu?

Its quite good while reading and loading and best columnar database on top of hadoop.

This kudu come with Cloudera so all component in one place. integration with impala script and compatible with parquet file format make it make more dynamic. Its dynamic partition also help during debugging. Kudu hive metastore integration is also make hive and kudu table accessible from same platform. The incremental data is replicated without any issue for end users. It support almost all ANSI sql so look very familiar. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Apache Kudu?

Kudu partitioning is done only on primary key which is not always suitable. Some cases we have time stamp as partition key but could not be primary key so reading huge table is concern here. So this need to be change in future . There is concern over Kudu Context concern with impala integration. Currently JDBC connectivity has still some issue for huge data.

Its camecase table name issue.Kudu tables with a column name containing upper case or non-ascii characters may not be used as an external table in Impala. Columns may be renamed in Kudu to work around this issue. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Bharat M.
BM
Specialist Architect
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Apache Kudu vs Hive, speed of execution."
What do you like best about Apache Kudu?

Speed of execution, specially with comparison to Apache Hive. Flexibility to work as a regular RDBMS table. It can be used for huge datamart with CDC logic at ease. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Apache Kudu?

You have to decide the primary key for each and every objects. So, more focus on the Data Modelling aspect. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Aman K.
AK
SDET
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Working with Apache kudu"
What do you like best about Apache Kudu?

Easily accessible from APACHE Impala query engine ,So building dashboard and OLAP experience is seamless. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Apache Kudu?

With large number of streaming data , the load on the system increase exponential this affecting other services running on same server . Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

RAVI K.
RK
Consultant
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Apache Kudu : Review"
What do you like best about Apache Kudu?

Kudu-Impala Integration Features

Raft Consensus Algorithm use to guarantee fault tolerance Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Apache Kudu?

Limited Scalability : data you can have in Kudu per cluster node and per cluster Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Telecommunications
CT
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Business partner of the seller or seller's competitor, not included in G2 scores.
"Very effective for Telco data"
What do you like best about Apache Kudu?

The best benefit is that you can run analytics on top of Hadoop. You don't need to propose an alternative big data solution to customer to run analytics if they have already selected Hadoop for Big Data storage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Apache Kudu?

Kudu has limitations in the type of data it can handle. You can't store complex structured data as you can do with Impala. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
UI
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Easy SQL based tool which is easy to integrate and used for heavy workloads"
What do you like best about Apache Kudu?

Easy to use

Updation and deletion which is not available in hive tables

Fast insertion deletion all ACID operations Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Apache Kudu?

Documentations are not available specially detailing heavy workloads, optimizations Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Divyam G.
DG
Big Data Developer
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Apache Kudu :lightning fast read and write"
What do you like best about Apache Kudu?

no need to learn HBase for Real-Time processing, Apache Kudu can help you.

easy to learn, efficient and you can update the records.

it provides Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Apache Kudu?

Primary must be the first column, some time it is difficult to maintain 1st column as the primary key. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Hossam E.
HE
Software Engineer
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Good But Consuming"
What do you like best about Apache Kudu?

the query is very fast and has a great performance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Apache Kudu?

it consume a lot of memory which destroy the system in long time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pricing

Pricing details for this product isn’t currently available. Visit the vendor’s website to learn more.

Apache Kudu Comparisons
Product Avatar Image
Hbase
Compare Now
Product Avatar Image
Apache Parquet
Compare Now
Product Avatar Image
ClickHouse
Compare Now
Product Avatar Image
Apache Kudu
View Alternatives