Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and UserTesting 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
FaceUp
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us Per Year
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Star Rating
(40)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Professional Performance EngineeringUserTesting
Star Rating
(784)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText LoadRunner Professional excels in stress testing capabilities, with a score of 8.3, while UserTesting's stress testing functionality is less emphasized, indicating that LoadRunner is better suited for performance testing in high-demand scenarios.
- Reviewers mention that UserTesting offers superior ease of setup with a score of 8.7 compared to LoadRunner's 6.7, making UserTesting a more user-friendly option for teams looking to quickly implement user feedback processes.
- G2 users highlight that UserTesting's quality of support is rated at 9.0, significantly higher than LoadRunner's 7.6, suggesting that UserTesting provides more responsive and helpful customer service, which is crucial for ongoing project success.
- Users on G2 note that LoadRunner shines in test variety with a score of 9.3, allowing for a broader range of testing scenarios, while UserTesting's test variety score of 8.3 indicates it may not cover as many testing methods, which could limit flexibility for some users.
- Reviewers say that UserTesting's feedback collection methods, particularly video interviews (8.8) and video snippets (8.7), are highly rated, showcasing its strength in qualitative user research compared to LoadRunner, which focuses more on quantitative performance metrics.
- Users report that OpenText LoadRunner Professional has a robust analytics feature with a score of 7.7, but UserTesting's reporting capabilities, particularly in feedback management and survey insights, are noted to be more comprehensive, making it easier for teams to derive actionable insights from user data.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No pricing availableUserTesting
Team-based Unlimited
Contact Us
Per Year
With a team-based unlimited plan, a team, department, or division (defined through a mutually agreed-upon enterprise scope) can run unlimited tests within a Fair Use policy and enjoy full access to the UserTesting platform. It’s ideal for organizations looking to scale experience research across multiple departments and geographies. Predictable contract terms provide budgeting and procurement certainty.
- Global participant panel across 60+ countries
- Enterprise-grade security and compliance (SOC2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPPA)
- Test builder and template gallery
Free Trial
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No trial information availableUserTesting
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
23
8.6
599
Ease of Use
8.3
24
8.4
630
Ease of Setup
6.7
9
8.6
295
Ease of Admin
7.4
9
8.7
231
Quality of Support
7.6
24
9.0
522
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.8
9
8.8
226
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
23
8.1
589
Features by Category
User Response Methods
Not enough data
7.6
317
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
374
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
296
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.1
182
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
351
|
Verified
Participant Selection
Not enough data
7.4
127
Not enough data
5.6
82
Not enough data
6.9
108
Not enough data
8.1
375
|
Verified
Insights
Not enough data
7.7
344
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
312
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.4
312
|
Verified
Generative AI
Not enough data
6.7
84
Functionality
8.3
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
Reporting
9.0
7
Not enough data
Feedback Source
Not enough data
8.0
113
Not enough data
8.4
130
Not enough data
8.4
131
Not enough data
7.7
83
Not enough data
8.3
155
Feedback Management
Not enough data
7.7
144
Not enough data
7.7
158
Not enough data
8.2
175
Not enough data
8.2
161
Insights
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.3
161
Not enough data
7.7
172
Agentic AI - Demo Automation
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Analytics
Not enough data
6.8
20
Not enough data
6.7
19
Not enough data
6.8
18
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Customization
Not enough data
6.9
18
Not enough data
6.2
17
Not enough data
6.2
18
Not enough data
5.8
17
Generative AI
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.3
19
Agentic AI - Experience Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Survey Management
Not enough data
6.1
22
Not enough data
7.9
24
Not enough data
6.5
22
Not enough data
6.5
24
Survey Customization
Not enough data
6.0
25
Not enough data
5.8
24
Not enough data
6.5
24
Not enough data
4.9
23
Survey Insights
Not enough data
6.3
24
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.1
24
Not enough data
6.8
24
Agentic AI - Survey
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
5.7
5
Not enough data
6.4
6
Survey Management
Not enough data
9.0
35
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
83
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
107
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
100
|
Verified
Process Management
Not enough data
8.0
102
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
82
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
System Management
Not enough data
8.8
89
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.2
15
|
Verified
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Survey Design - Consumer Insights Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Audience Access - Consumer Insights Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Collection - Consumer Insights Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics - Consumer Insights Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration - Consumer Insights Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and UserTesting share no categories
Unique Categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering is categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and Load Testing Tools
UserTesting is categorized as Consumer Video Feedback, User Research, Enterprise Feedback Management, Experience Management, Survey, and Consumer Insights Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
UserTesting
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
47.1%
Computer Software
14.7%
Hospital & Health Care
5.9%
Staffing and Recruiting
2.9%
Sporting Goods
2.9%
Other
26.5%
Financial Services
10.4%
Computer Software
9.7%
Information Technology and Services
8.8%
Retail
6.5%
Consumer Goods
3.9%
Other
60.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has no discussions with answers
Will you consider building out videos and demos for specific prospective users?
2 Comments
SG
The usertesting.com sales team is very informed and supportive. Im pretty sure if you contacted them directly. They will arrange a demo for you. Read more
Can you send me documentation on how iterative product design feedback is better served with 5 inter
1 Comment
LB
Depends on whether you are looking for usability issues or quantitative results (i.e., benchmarking). Both are of value.Read more
Best Practices
1 Comment
LB
I agree and we've also had this as a barrier that we have not been able to solve. Wish it would use software that they normally use.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
