Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Jetbrains Fleet and Qt 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Opti Digital
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
1oT
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Jetbrains Fleet
Star Rating
(58)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Jetbrains FleetQt
Star Rating
(53)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about QtSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Qt excels in multi-language support with a rating of 9.4, making it a preferred choice for developers working on international projects, while Jetbrains Fleet, with a rating of 8.3, offers decent support but lacks the extensive language options that Qt provides.
- Reviewers mention that Jetbrains Fleet shines in ease of setup, scoring 9.7 compared to Qt's 8.3, indicating that users find Fleet more straightforward to implement in their development environments.
- G2 users highlight that Qt's file management system is rated at 8.6, which is seen as effective but not as robust as Jetbrains Fleet's impressive score of 9.0, where users appreciate the intuitive organization and accessibility of files.
- Users on G2 report that Jetbrains Fleet's customization options are rated at 8.3, which some find limiting compared to Qt's 8.7, where reviewers appreciate the flexibility to tailor the environment to their specific needs.
- Reviewers say that both products provide solid help guides, but Jetbrains Fleet's guides are rated slightly higher at 8.4, with users noting that they are more comprehensive and easier to follow than those offered by Qt, which scored 8.8.
- Users report that while both products have strong patching and updates processes, Qt's score of 9.1 indicates a more proactive approach to maintaining software integrity, whereas Jetbrains Fleet's score of 7.7 suggests room for improvement in this area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Jetbrains Fleet
No pricing availableQt
No pricing availableFree Trial
Jetbrains Fleet
No trial information availableQt
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
55
8.5
45
Ease of Use
9.1
55
8.4
45
Ease of Setup
9.7
12
8.5
13
Ease of Admin
9.3
10
8.3
11
Quality of Support
8.6
53
8.3
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
11
7.8
10
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
54
8.2
45
Features by Category
Functionality
9.4
16
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
9.4
15
Not enough data
8.7
15
Not enough data
8.9
15
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
32
Not enough data
9.0
32
Not enough data
8.6
30
Not enough data
8.3
30
Not enough data
8.6
29
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.4
29
Not enough data
C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Design
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Control
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Platform - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Advertising - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Mobile Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Jetbrains Fleet and Qt are categorized as Python Integrated Development Environments (IDE)
Unique Categories
Jetbrains Fleet is categorized as PHP Integrated Development Environments (IDE) and Java Integrated Development Environments (IDE)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Jetbrains Fleet
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Qt
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
51.7%
Information Technology and Services
17.2%
Industrial Automation
3.4%
E-Learning
3.4%
Computer & Network Security
3.4%
Other
20.7%
Computer Software
28.8%
Information Technology and Services
7.7%
Telecommunications
5.8%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
5.8%
Higher Education
5.8%
Other
46.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Jetbrains Fleet has no discussions with answers
What are the primary benefits of QtCreator?
1 Comment
LR
QtCreator has many benefits:
+ It is stable mature software being continuously developed and maintained following best practices since 1995.
+ It has...Read more
What is the use of Qt Creator?
1 Comment
SP
It’s a multi-platform Développement IDE available for windows, Linux, macOS, android and others.Read more
Is Qt Creator IDE free?
1 Comment
SP
QT Creator is the development IDE, you can use the IDE however the QT libraries are only free for open source development which means if you use the open...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
