Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare GNU Octave and SOLIDWORKS

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Star Rating
(55)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GNU Octave
SOLIDWORKS
SOLIDWORKS
Star Rating
(621)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.3% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SOLIDWORKS
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that SOLIDWORKS excels in CAD-CAM compatibility with a score of 8.8, making it a preferred choice for those needing seamless integration between design and manufacturing processes. In contrast, GNU Octave, while strong in numerical computations, does not focus on CAD-CAM functionalities, which may limit its appeal for users in engineering design.
  • Reviewers mention that SOLIDWORKS offers superior 3D/solid modeling tools with a score of 9.7, which is crucial for detailed design work. Users on G2 highlight features like the "3D modeling tools" and "Rendering tools" as standout aspects, while GNU Octave's modeling capabilities are more suited for mathematical simulations rather than detailed design.
  • G2 users indicate that SOLIDWORKS provides robust support for file formats, scoring 8.6 for STL compatibility and 9.1 for exporting files, which is essential for users needing to share designs across different platforms. Conversely, GNU Octave's file support is more limited, focusing primarily on data analysis rather than extensive CAD file interoperability.
  • Users say that SOLIDWORKS shines in its drawing capabilities, achieving a score of 9.4, which is vital for creating detailed technical drawings. Reviewers mention the "Drawing Tools" as a key feature, while GNU Octave lacks this focus, as it is primarily a numerical computing tool rather than a design software.
  • Reviewers mention that SOLIDWORKS has a higher ease of use rating (8.6) compared to GNU Octave (8.4), indicating that users find SOLIDWORKS more intuitive for design tasks. Users on G2 appreciate the user-friendly interface and comprehensive tutorials available for SOLIDWORKS, which may not be as prevalent for GNU Octave.
  • Users report that SOLIDWORKS has a more extensive library of components (7.9) compared to GNU Octave, which lacks a dedicated library for design components. This makes SOLIDWORKS a more attractive option for users who require a wide range of pre-built parts for their projects, enhancing productivity and design efficiency.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GNU Octave
No pricing available
SOLIDWORKS
No pricing available
Free Trial
GNU Octave
No trial information available
SOLIDWORKS
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
43
8.8
516
Ease of Use
8.4
43
8.6
520
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.2
92
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.9
46
Quality of Support
8.2
39
8.1
457
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.3
46
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
41
8.6
511
Features by Category
Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM)Hide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
Not enough data
8.7
51
CAD to CAM
Not enough data
9.1
41
Not enough data
8.8
41
Not enough data
8.9
41
CNC Programming
Not enough data
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.4
36
Machining
Not enough data
8.6
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
8.8
103
Design
Not enough data
9.4
99
Not enough data
9.4
99
Not enough data
9.3
95
Not enough data
8.1
95
Edit
Not enough data
8.5
94
Not enough data
8.3
87
Not enough data
9.3
94
Not enough data
8.3
82
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.6
91
Not enough data
9.0
92
Not enough data
8.4
87
Not enough data
8.8
32
Library
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.6
22
CAD
Not enough data
8.9
23
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.0
28
Integration
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
9.6
27
Not enough data
8.5
23
Not enough data
8.7
30
Data
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.2
24
Not enough data
8.9
24
Not enough data
8.1
22
Not enough data
8.6
23
Logistics
Not enough data
9.1
25
Additive ManufacturingHide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
7.9
64
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
8.8
60
Not enough data
8.6
46
Not enough data
8.4
51
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.6
54
Not enough data
8.6
58
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.6
48
Not enough data
8.8
57
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.7
47
Not enough data
8.6
52
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
6.1
19
Not enough data
6.1
19
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.4
21
Not enough data
Administration
8.4
17
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
Capabilities
8.9
20
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
8.1
17
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
Methodology
8.8
13
Not enough data
8.3
19
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
47
File Options
Not enough data
8.8
43
Not enough data
9.1
42
Not enough data
9.0
41
Not enough data
9.3
43
Not enough data
8.3
34
Not enough data
8.2
40
Tools
Not enough data
9.4
42
Not enough data
9.0
40
Not enough data
9.2
42
Design
Not enough data
9.4
42
Not enough data
8.0
14
Design
Not enough data
7.7
11
Not enough data
7.7
11
Tools
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Library
Not enough data
8.1
12
Platform
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
7.9
11
Customization
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
8.5
13
8.2
60
Design
9.5
10
9.2
59
8.3
11
9.0
59
8.2
10
8.8
59
8.2
10
7.6
58
Tools
8.5
11
7.9
52
8.3
11
7.9
54
8.2
10
7.3
47
Work
9.0
10
7.5
40
7.9
11
7.8
41
8.2
11
8.2
48
8.8
11
8.1
43
8.0
11
8.4
46
Environment
8.7
10
8.3
52
8.5
11
8.4
50
8.3
10
8.2
48
9.0
10
8.6
52
Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)Hide 18 FeaturesShow 18 Features
Not enough data
8.3
27
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
9.0
24
Not enough data
7.6
24
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.3
24
Not enough data
8.2
23
Not enough data
7.8
25
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
7.5
22
Not enough data
8.2
22
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
7.8
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
SOLIDWORKS
SOLIDWORKS
GNU Octave and SOLIDWORKS are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
66.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
17.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
17.0%
SOLIDWORKS
SOLIDWORKS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
43.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
34.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
22.2%
Reviewers' Industry
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Research
11.3%
Computer Software
11.3%
Information Technology and Services
5.7%
Higher Education
5.7%
Food Production
5.7%
Other
60.4%
SOLIDWORKS
SOLIDWORKS
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
22.7%
Design
12.1%
Automotive
6.6%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
6.0%
Medical Devices
5.8%
Other
46.9%
Alternatives
GNU Octave
GNU Octave Alternatives
Scilab
Scilab
Add Scilab
MATLAB
MATLAB
Add MATLAB
Posit
Posit
Add Posit
Simulink
Simulink
Add Simulink
SOLIDWORKS
SOLIDWORKS Alternatives
Autodesk Fusion
Autodesk Fusion
Add Autodesk Fusion
Onshape
Onshape
Add Onshape
Designcenter Solid Edge
Designcenter Solid Edge
Add Designcenter Solid Edge
Inventor
Inventor
Add Inventor
Discussions
GNU Octave
GNU Octave Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
GNU Octave has no discussions with answers
SOLIDWORKS
SOLIDWORKS Discussions
What is SOLIDWORKS used for?
3 Comments
Yagnik P.
YP
SOLIDWORKS IS USED FOR MULTIPLE WORK LIKE 2D & 3D CAD MODELING, ASSEMBLY MODELING, SHWWET METAL MODELING, SURFACE MODELING, RENDERING, SIMULATION, 3D...Read more
How to stop or cancel a ongoing command.
2 Comments
Gaurav P.
GP
By pressing escape key.Read more
best use o this software
2 Comments
Onkar S.
OS
Making 2D sketches and extruding them to make 3d sketches.Read more