Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cube and Vena 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aleph
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
SimplyMerit
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ClearPoint Strategy
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (79.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (60.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us
Cube
Star Rating
(122)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (79.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CubeVena
Star Rating
(365)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (60.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Vena excels in Data Import with a score of 9.0, allowing for seamless integration of financial data, while Cube Software received a lower score of 8.3, indicating potential challenges in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Vena's Budget Hierarchies feature, rated at 9.1, provides a robust structure for organizing budgets, whereas Cube Software's score of 8.5 suggests it may not offer the same level of flexibility and organization.
- G2 users highlight Vena's superior Quality of Support with a score of 9.1, which is crucial for users needing assistance, compared to Cube Software's score of 9.2, indicating that while both are strong, Vena may provide a slightly more responsive experience.
- Reviewers say that Vena's Embedded Analytics feature, rated at 9.5, allows for deeper insights directly within the platform, while Cube Software's analytics capabilities, although good, scored lower, suggesting less integration of analytics into the user experience.
- Users on G2 report that Vena's Performance Management Integration scored 9.1, making it a strong choice for organizations looking to align performance metrics with financial planning, while Cube Software's lower score indicates it may not integrate as effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Vena's Forecasting capabilities, with a score of 9.4, provide more accurate and reliable projections compared to Cube Software's score of 8.8, which may lead to less confidence in financial planning outcomes.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cube
No pricing availableVena
Professional Plan
Contact Us
Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and add as you grow. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Vena Copilot for FP&A, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal.
- Full Microsoft Excel Integration
- Central Database
- Integrations
Free Trial
Cube
Free Trial is available
Vena
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
98
8.9
265
Ease of Use
8.9
98
8.6
308
Ease of Setup
8.7
51
8.1
252
Ease of Admin
9.1
46
8.5
153
Quality of Support
9.1
97
9.0
261
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
48
9.1
152
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
91
9.2
254
Features by Category
Budget Creation
8.2
62
8.8
161
8.6
57
9.0
162
8.6
59
8.8
162
8.2
61
8.8
154
7.9
47
8.4
134
8.8
56
9.0
159
Budget Management
8.7
50
9.1
145
8.2
49
8.9
143
8.1
43
8.8
148
Forecasting
8.8
56
9.1
154
8.9
48
9.0
148
8.6
48
8.9
145
8.4
49
8.9
147
7.7
10
6.6
69
Analytics
8.7
58
8.9
150
8.7
53
9.1
148
8.5
49
9.0
142
Agentic AI - Budgeting and Forecasting
Not enough data
5.8
14
Not enough data
6.1
14
Not enough data
6.2
14
Data Management
8.3
59
8.9
97
8.8
53
9.0
95
8.5
55
8.5
95
Reporting Structure
8.7
50
8.9
97
8.1
49
8.7
94
8.3
46
8.8
96
Standard Analytics
8.1
42
8.3
88
8.0
46
8.6
91
8.6
56
8.7
94
8.4
59
8.8
96
Custom Analytics
6.6
50
8.4
89
7.5
50
8.4
88
8.6
54
8.8
94
8.7
53
8.6
90
8.3
10
9.0
69
Agentic AI - Financial Analysis
Not enough data
6.1
16
Not enough data
6.1
17
Platform
Not enough data
9.2
27
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
9.4
28
Not enough data
9.6
28
Not enough data
9.3
27
Not enough data
9.2
28
Not enough data
9.5
28
Not enough data
9.5
30
Not enough data
9.6
28
Not enough data
9.4
27
Benchmarking and Equity - Compensation Management
Not enough data
9.2
25
Not enough data
9.3
25
Not enough data
9.2
25
Platform
Not enough data
9.4
35
Not enough data
9.2
34
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.4
36
Not enough data
8.9
35
Not enough data
8.9
32
Not enough data
9.5
35
Not enough data
9.3
33
Reconciliation
9.1
32
8.9
74
|
Verified
9.1
31
9.1
76
|
Verified
8.6
25
8.8
65
|
Verified
Reporting
9.1
33
9.0
80
|
Verified
8.8
30
8.6
74
|
Verified
9.1
32
8.9
80
|
Verified
Closing Process
8.8
18
8.8
66
|
Verified
8.3
18
8.6
58
|
Verified
9.0
24
8.9
69
|
Verified
AI - Financial Close
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
7.1
8
Financial Planning
8.8
12
8.8
91
|
Verified
9.1
18
9.1
95
|
Verified
8.2
16
8.5
93
|
Verified
Agentic AI - FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis)
Not enough data
7.1
25
Not enough data
7.3
25
Financial Insight
9.4
18
9.3
114
|
Verified
8.9
18
9.0
109
|
Verified
9.1
19
9.2
111
|
Verified
Data
6.9
18
8.3
104
|
Verified
8.3
19
8.3
109
|
Verified
9.3
20
9.0
112
|
Verified
8.4
19
8.8
105
|
Verified
Status Communication
8.4
20
8.5
105
|
Verified
9.4
18
9.0
110
|
Verified
7.9
16
8.9
103
|
Verified
7.8
12
8.4
89
|
Verified
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reconciliation - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
8.8
34
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Audit - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
9.0
34
Not enough data
9.2
32
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
9.3
33
Integrations - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
9.4
31
Not enough data
9.2
31
Not enough data
9.0
31
Not enough data
9.0
31
User Permissions and Security - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
9.4
32
Not enough data
9.6
32
Not enough data
9.3
32
Not enough data
9.4
32
Agentic AI - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
7.9
8
Sales Performance Features - Sales Planning
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
9.4
33
Not enough data
9.4
33
Not enough data
9.4
33
Not enough data
9.2
32
Not enough data
9.3
33
Not enough data
9.2
33
Territory Management - Sales Planning
Not enough data
9.3
32
Not enough data
9.4
33
Quota & Capacity Management - Sales Planning
Not enough data
9.6
31
Not enough data
9.3
31
Not enough data
9.4
31
Agentic AI - Sales Planning
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Platform - Compensation Planning
Not enough data
9.8
7
Not enough data
9.5
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
6.4
6
Not enough data
6.7
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Additional Features - Compensation Planning
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
6.9
6
Agentic AI - Sales Performance Management
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Incentives
Not enough data
9.1
33
Not enough data
9.5
33
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
9.3
33
Personalization
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
9.1
33
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
9.4
33
Administrative
Not enough data
9.1
33
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
9.1
33
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cube and Vena are categorized as Financial Close, FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis), Budgeting and Forecasting, and Financial Analysis
Unique Categories
Cube has no unique categories
Vena is categorized as Financial Reconciliation, Sales Planning, Sales Performance Management, Compensation Management, and Compensation Planning
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Vena
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
13.1%
Computer Software
12.3%
Financial Services
9.8%
Marketing and Advertising
4.1%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
4.1%
Other
56.6%
Information Technology and Services
9.0%
Financial Services
7.6%
Accounting
7.3%
Computer Software
5.9%
Non-Profit Organization Management
4.5%
Other
65.7%
Discussions
Cube has no discussions with answers
How long does it take for Vena to sync the files?
2 Comments
GC
The integration we are using is automated with Netsuite and for Vena to be updated with the most recent actuals from Netsuite takes a few minutes, but I'm...Read more
What's the best way to create a truly dynamic input template?
1 Comment
AH
You have to map the choose options as their own measures and in a separate block. They have to be able to return independently from the the dimensions their...Read more
What is the maximum time to wait for synchronization of the information?
1 Comment
RT
Data is saved or synchronized almost instantaneously and team members simply have to refresh the template on their side to see the updated forecast.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
