Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare BoardDocs and Nasdaq Boardvantage 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Easy Board
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (54.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (40.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Upfront Pricing No Hidden Fees
BoardDocs
Star Rating
(50)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (54.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about BoardDocsNasdaq Boardvantage
Star Rating
(160)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Upfront Pricing No Hidden Fees
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Nasdaq BoardvantageSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that BoardDocs excels in document management with a score of 9.3, making it a preferred choice for organizations that prioritize efficient handling of meeting materials. In contrast, Nasdaq Boardvantage, while still strong, has a lower score in this area, indicating it may not be as robust for document-centric workflows.
- Reviewers mention that BoardDocs offers superior ease of use with a score of 9.4, which is particularly beneficial for users who may not be tech-savvy. Nasdaq Boardvantage, with a score of 8.9, may require a steeper learning curve, potentially impacting user adoption.
- G2 users highlight BoardDocs' meeting management capabilities, particularly in agenda building (8.8) and meeting minutes (8.7), which are essential for effective board meetings. Nasdaq Boardvantage, while scoring higher in scheduling (8.6), does not match BoardDocs in these critical areas.
- Users on G2 report that BoardDocs shines in quality of support with a near-perfect score of 9.9, indicating a strong commitment to customer service. Nasdaq Boardvantage, although still rated highly at 9.6, may not provide the same level of responsiveness and assistance.
- Reviewers mention that BoardDocs' integration capabilities, particularly with e-signatures (8.6), are a significant advantage, streamlining the approval process. Nasdaq Boardvantage, however, has lower scores in e-signature integration (6.7), which could hinder efficiency in document approvals.
- Users say that BoardDocs' meeting archives (9.3) are highly praised for their accessibility and organization, making it easier for board members to reference past meetings. Nasdaq Boardvantage, while offering meeting tools, does not achieve the same level of user satisfaction in this area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
BoardDocs
No pricing availableNasdaq Boardvantage
Pricing Built Around Your Organization
Upfront Pricing
No Hidden Fees
Our upfront pricing model comes with a one-time implementation fee based on the number of users along—no hidden fees. Enjoy unlimited storage and access to all features and functionalities. Request pricing for your organization.
- Security
- Remote Presenter
- Document Editing, Version Tracking, and Search
Free Trial
BoardDocs
No trial information availableNasdaq Boardvantage
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
20
9.2
114
Ease of Use
8.9
22
8.9
118
Ease of Setup
8.8
21
8.8
95
Ease of Admin
8.9
19
8.9
90
Quality of Support
9.0
25
9.7
111
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
20
9.6
89
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
25
9.4
113
Features by Category
Meeting Management
6.2
11
8.3
71
8.8
10
8.6
74
8.5
10
7.7
66
8.3
10
9.3
88
7.7
10
7.9
65
5.7
9
7.5
66
5.4
9
7.2
62
Board Tools
5.9
9
8.0
70
8.3
9
9.0
79
6.9
9
8.0
80
5.9
9
7.7
59
8.3
9
9.2
76
7.8
9
8.4
62
5.2
9
6.6
49
4.8
9
7.2
55
5.4
9
7.1
53
5.4
8
7.1
51
7.7
5
6.8
28
6.3
5
6.6
26
Not enough data
6.1
26
Generative AI - Board Management
4.0
5
4.7
25
Agentic AI - Board Management
Not enough data
4.4
6
Not enough data
6.7
6
Not enough data
4.7
6
Agentic AI - Decision-Making
Not enough data
Not enough data
Pre-Meeting Tools
Not enough data
7.6
34
Not enough data
8.0
34
Not enough data
8.0
35
Meeting Tools
Not enough data
5.9
31
Not enough data
6.7
34
Not enough data
7.2
33
Not enough data
8.8
35
Post-Meeting Tools
Not enough data
6.1
31
Not enough data
7.5
31
Not enough data
5.9
29
Agentic AI - Meeting Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
BoardDocs and Nasdaq Boardvantage are categorized as Board Management
Unique Categories
BoardDocs has no unique categories
Nasdaq Boardvantage is categorized as Meeting Management and Decision-Making
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
BoardDocs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Nasdaq Boardvantage
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Education Management
50.0%
Primary/Secondary Education
20.0%
Public Policy
6.0%
Higher Education
6.0%
Government Administration
6.0%
Other
12.0%
Hospital & Health Care
13.8%
Banking
9.4%
Insurance
8.8%
Financial Services
6.9%
Non-Profit Organization Management
4.4%
Other
56.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
BoardDocs has no discussions with answers
prefer meeting use color label to define different level
1 Comment
Official Response from Nasdaq Boardvantage
Thank you for the suggestion! We look forward to discussing your needs and we will be in touch.Read more
what is the best way to search past meeting record from iPad without calender view? any chance to pull all same meeting in one view?
1 Comment
Official Response from Nasdaq Boardvantage
Hi Jody! The NBV iPad App offers 3 Meetings landing options: card, list and month. We recommend the list view for searching through a long history of past...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
