
I find Convene's most useful approach, especially when discussing critical decisions across multiple infrastructure projects with leadership and cross-functional teams. As a Senior Project Manager, I coordinate input from engineering, finance, procurement, and execution teams.
Convene allows me to systematically organize supporting documents, key discussion points, and approval-related information for project review meetings. An interesting use case for me is project stage-gate reviews, where it's important to maintain context for technical observations, pending approvals, and management decisions before moving a project to the next execution phase. This also makes it easier to preserve the decision context of discussions rather than limiting them to just the meeting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The platform's governance-focused structure is useful, but infrastructure projects sometimes require organizing information according to project-specific requirements. For example, presenting technical deviations, approval dependencies, and milestone-related discussion points in a customized format could be more flexible.
Managing multiple project reviews would become more convenient if project-level reporting templates and cross-project comparison options received additional customization. Overall, these are improvement opportunities rather than major limitations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.


