Users report that Simulink excels in discrete event modeling with a score of 9.2, which reviewers mention is particularly beneficial for complex system simulations, while Altair HyperWorks scores slightly lower at 8.6 in this area.
Reviewers mention that Altair HyperWorks shines in rendering tools, achieving a score of 9.0, which users say provides high-quality visualizations, whereas Simulink's rendering tools score only 7.6, indicating a gap in visual output quality.
G2 users highlight that Simulink's editing tools are rated at 8.8, with reviewers saying that the intuitive interface allows for efficient modifications, while Altair HyperWorks scores higher at 9.0, suggesting a more robust editing experience.
Users on G2 report that Altair HyperWorks has superior hardware support with a score of 9.3, which reviewers mention is crucial for running simulations on various platforms, compared to Simulink's score of 7.8.
Reviewers say that both products perform well in finite element analysis, but Altair HyperWorks edges out with a score of 8.8, while Simulink's score of 8.2 indicates it may not be as comprehensive in this area.
Users report that Simulink's continuous event modeling is rated at 8.4, which is lower than Altair HyperWorks' impressive score of 9.3, suggesting that users may find more flexibility and capability in Altair for continuous simulations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Altair HyperWorks
No pricing available
Simulink
No pricing available
Free Trial
Altair HyperWorks
No trial information available
Simulink
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
46
8.4
82
Ease of Use
7.6
46
8.0
88
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.6
43
7.9
86
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.