DevOps Software

While the feature set is massive, the UI is starting to feel quite bloated and cluttered, making it difficult for new team members to find specific repository settings. I also find the notification system frustratingly noisy; even with custom filters, important mentions often get buried under automated bot alerts. Additionally, debugging GitHub Actions can be a tedious 'commit-and-push' cycle because there’s no native, robust way to test complex workflows locally. Lastly, the pricing jump from the 'Team' to 'Enterprise' tier feels steep for mid-sized startups that need advanced security features like SAML SSO Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

First and mageing the codebase and tracking project versions, and collaborating with the large teams as well. GitHub solves the chaos of collaborative coding and version management. It eliminates the risk of overwriting teammate code through structured Pull Requests and provides a 'time machine' for our codebase via a detailed commit history. Additionally, it streamlines our DevOps workflow, allowing us to automate testing and deployments so we can focus on building features rather than managing server files Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'm not sure if it's a browser issue (I use Firefox), but sometimes pages load but the components themselves take some time to get rendered. I've also encountered a few hiccups with the search feature when I'm searching for specific flags; I have to be case-sensitive sometimes when I search for flags. Maybe it would be better if it was a bit more relaxed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Managing a huge number of feature flags through a clean UI for different environments (dev, testing, prod, ...etc.) save me a lot of time. I can even track and monitor evaluations for flags over time which helped me in debugging some production issues with ease. An incident that might take me a few hours to find its root cause now only takes 15-30 minutes through tracking flag evaluations on Launch Darkly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing as such.

One standout feature is how smoothly Bitrise integrates with Git providers and other third-party tools. The workflow configuration feels flexible while still staying simple, so we can customize build steps without adding unnecessary complexity. The build logs are detailed and easy to follow when debugging, which helps cut down troubleshooting time significantly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Performance has been reliable, with consistent build times and minimal downtime. The UI makes it easy to monitor builds, manage environment variables, and track deployment history. Overall, Bitrise has helped streamline our release process and improved our team’s productivity.

Highly recommended for any team looking for a robust and developer-friendly CI/CD solution for mobile apps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In my personal opinion, the interface of GitLab can be improved further. In comparison to other version control systems, the color scheme of GitLab can be more balanced and refined. Moreover, many important settings of GitLab are hidden deep inside the menu system, making it difficult for users to access them, especially for those who are using GitLab less frequently. Accessing important settings from more prominent locations would greatly improve the user experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GitLab fixes the issue of code change management, collaboration, and project stability all in one place. GitLab offers me a stable version control system that ensures my code is always safe and easily trackable, so I can easily see what happened when a bug or crash happens and easily revert or repair it. GitLab also makes collaboration easy by allowing team members to review, comment, and work on code right from the platform, without having to go through any hassle of setting up or transferring files. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think Appcircle could benefit from expanding some advanced documentation and in-app guidance for more complex configurations. Having more detailed examples or best practice quotes for advanced use cases could make onboarding and optimization even smoother. Step-by-step examples for advanced CI/CD scenarios, such as complex workflow configurations or multi-environment setups, would be very helpful. Short video tutorials or real-world samples could also make advanced features even more accessible. Continuous in-app tips for advanced settings could further enhance the user experience, especially for new team members. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Appcircle as our mobile CI/CD platform. It centralizes and automates build, testing, and distribution, streamlining release cycles and reducing manual workload. The flexibility in customization and responsive support significantly improve our development workflow and productivity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We have experienced issues with rollbacks due to accents in the names of objects; when attempting to reprocess the deployment, these are not recognized correctly. This has caused us inconveniences, as the rollback process must be carried out in a very short time due to the incidents generated by the deployment. Additionally, the experience with support has been complicated, especially regarding response times for this type of situation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Boost the reliability in delivering changes to their final destination, which has resulted in a positive experience during audits. The reduction in deployment time and the automated process for delivering business-requested changes generate enthusiasm and add additional value to the agility process that the organization requires. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The fact that you can't deploy individual servers when they're part of a group is a little bit annoying. But it can be circumvented through their API. It would be great to have a UI button to deploy to those servers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

DeployHQ fills feature gaps that many managed hosts lack and allows automation of significant portions of deployments and workflows with its API. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The "Paywall" Fatigue: Many features that used to be standard (or feel like they should be) are now locked behind Teams or Enterprise editions. For example, Undo migrations, dry runs, and certain advanced reporting tools require a paid license, which can be a tough sell for smaller teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Problems Solved

Database Drift: It prevents environments (Dev, QA, Prod) from falling out of sync. Without Flyway, "hotfixes" often happen directly in Production and never make it back to Dev; Flyway detects this drift and provides scripts to resolve it.

Deployment Anxiety: It eliminates the manual "run these 10 scripts in this specific order" process, which is prone to human error.

Lack of Traceability: It solves the mystery of "Who changed this table and when?" by maintaining a mandatory flyway_schema_history table within the database itself.

"It Works on My Machine" Syndrome: It ensures that every developer is working against the exact same schema version, preventing code failures caused by missing columns or tables. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some advanced configuration options aren’t immediately available or obvious out of the box, especially for more complex CI workflows. However, the documentation and support team are very responsive, and in our experience they’ve been open to feedback and willing to help find good solutions when these edge cases come up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Semaphore helps us efficiently manage CI resources and optimize pipeline execution based on the nature of the changes being made. This reduces CI costs, shortens queue times, and improves the overall developer experience by giving our team more control over how and when resources are used. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pricing can scale quickly as usage grows, especially for teams running more advanced features, but this is largely offset by the time saved and stability provided. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Vercel removes the complexity of frontend hosting, CI/CD, and performance optimization. For us, this means we can ship and iterate on a production AI assistant quickly, ensure fast response times for users, and maintain a high-quality, reliable experience without managing servers or DevOps overhead. Really good one. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't have any disappointment with this tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Copado Essentials addresses the challenge of manual, error-prone Salesforce deployments and the lack of standardization across environments. Before using Copado Essentials, deployments took significant coordination, relied on manual tracking, and came with a higher risk of missing components or having tests fail. With Copado Essentials, I get a structured, Salesforce-native DevOps framework that includes automated validations, version control integration, and controlled promotions, which helps reduce deployment failures and the rework that often follows. Overall, it saves me time, improves release reliability, increases visibility into changes, and lets me focus more on delivering business value instead of constantly managing deployment risk. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Making changes is complex and requires constant vendor engagement.

Someone new needs time to understand RevTrac.

DevOps process using revtrac is not simple still. Integration with automation tools is not easy.

No easy way to identify deployment errors before the deployment is done.

Reporting is non existent on DORA metrics. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Helps in automated transport depoyment and easy tracking of changes. Workflows and approvals are customized and helps maintain quality while deploying changes from one system to other. RevTrac helps in have a centralized control of all changes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI could be more intuitive, and sometimes large data sets take longer to process than expected. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Prodly DevOps to make Salesforce change management and deployments faster and less error-prone. It automates configuration migration, ensures accuracy, maintains compliance, improves release speed, and reduces deployment risk. It saves time and gives me confidence in smooth changes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is no such feature which I disliked. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Earlier from other products , deployment was not smooth. It is easy to track. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I believe that the DevOps solution should have greater segmentation of access and security, with the possibility of segmenting access to pipelines or other resources within the branch. In the backup solution, it would be interesting to have the possibility to transfer data between orgs, such as removing data from org A and transferring it to B. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Flosum as a DevOps and backup solution for Salesforce, solving issues like rollback, code versioning, and quality analysis, which were absent in Salesforce's DevOps Center. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It’s hard to tell when a feature is available for a quick deploy, which makes planning and timing releases more difficult than it should be. This could be resolved with a small icon to let our team know if their deployment will take 10 minutes or 2 hours. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Gearset streamlines our overall Salesforce development process, helping ensure the team stays compliant and efficient. It has also significantly improved visibility and reduced risk—two major pain points that were addressed by implementing Gearset. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It does not yet support flutter web(dart). It would be a really great addition to the platform Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Google Cloud Build is providing me serverless platform where I can focus on writing code instead of tangling with deploying code. With Google Cloud Build my transition from writing code to deployment has been super fast. I don't need to mind about creating and maintaining servers anymore. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The initial setup was the only part that felt genuinely tricky. We spent quite a bit of time going back and forth with DevOps to land on the right configurations, plugins, agent permissions, and service accounts. Once that was sorted out, everything has been smooth sailing.

Every so often, the Selenium Grid goes down, but that’s tied to our remote machines rather than Jenkins itself—usually a restart on the Windows side brings it right back. Plugin updates can also be a little touchy at times: dependencies get bumped and then a job starts complaining, but a quick rollback or a small reconfiguration typically resolves it. None of this is a dealbreaker; they’re just minor bumps you notice more when deadlines are tight. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jenkins solves the repeatable testing problem for us. Rather than running test suites by hand, we rely on pipelines that run on a schedule, target the right environment, publish reports, and notify the team. The result is faster feedback, fewer manual errors, and a clear trail showing what ran, when it ran, and why it passed or failed. It also keeps coordination straightforward: there’s one place to check status, logs, artifacts, and history, which makes handoffs and audits much easier. Overall, we spend less time babysitting runs, more time fixing real issues, and the whole automation workflow feels calmer and more manageable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Although Buddy does offer a free tier, reviewers caution that it can be limiting in terms of build minutes and concurrencies, making it less ideal for use by hobbyists or organizations trying to start off without a cost Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Before tools like Buddy, the process of deploying code involved tasks like manually copying files, writing scripts, or remembering a set of steps whenever you wished to deploy code.

Buddy solves this by providing automated pipelines that run on every commit, push, or merge, thus ensuring a consistent deployment without any human error. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Even though YAML is readable, getting comfortable with writing playbooks, structuring roles, and understanding best practices takes time. My new team members have often needed guidance before they can contribute effectively in our platform.

May be few cases where they struggeled are role structuring, output capturing and reusing andYAML Sensitivity are more prone to error.

UI is helpful, but it introduces extra complexity compared to using Ansible alone. Managing inventories, credentials, and job templates through the controller sometimes feels more complicated than necessary.

These are just my experiences, others may feel it easy though if the have already used CFT or TF. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

First and foremost, It helps us cut down on a lot of manual work. Tasks that used to take hours—like setting up servers or applying patches, confuring predefined softwares like datadog agent, awscli, python etc etc—now run automatically in the background, which saves time and reduces mistakes. It also keeps everything consistent across our systems, so we don’t end up with different configurations causing issues later. Because it works with many types of environments, we can manage everything from one place instead of juggling multiple tools. Overall, it makes our day‑to‑day operations run smoother and help us the team focus on more important tasks or improvements/advancements instead of repetitive tasks that goes on endlessly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.