DevOps Software

I have no issues with Flosum, its a great software and I was pleasure to take the trainnings and certification exams.

I have no issues with Flosum, its a great software and I was pleasure to take the trainnings and certification exams.

Control all the changes, through this software. Control all the changes, through this software.

Control all the changes, through this software.

Control all the changes, through this software. Control all the changes, through this software.

Control all the changes, through this software.

Control all the changes, through this software. Control all the changes, through this software.

Control all the changes, through this software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If you want to Delivers and working with DevOps, you need Flosum! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Control all the changes, through this software. Control all the changes, through this software.

Control all the changes, through this software.

Amazing Software and Flosum's Team Support

Amazing Software and Flosum's Team Support

Control all the changes, through this software. Control all the changes, through this software.

Control all the changes, through this software.

Amazing Software and Flosum's Team Support

Control all the changes, through this software. Control all the changes, through this software.

Control all the changes, through this software.

Amazing Software and Flosum's Team Support Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When I adopt a SAAS platform I would like to see myself using it for the long term. I would like to see a slightly cheaper option in the Pro level. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Buddy will be a good choice for your project(s) and you will not regret it. Give it a try. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

With Buddy I don’t have to worry about FTPing my files every time I want to push up a change. Instead it’s very easy once I set up the pipeline. I feel like I can concentrate on developing more without worrying about how to get my code out there. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

User Voice feedback to feature release process is too slow

Data Deployment feature is not satisfactory Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Improving Release Management

Tracking Test Coverage

Monitoring Org

Deployment Rollbacks

Static Code Analysis - Code Reviews Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I wish it were able to build faster. This isn't necessarily a problem with the system, but I'd like builds to be faster in the cloud than they would be on my developer desktops. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If you're considering Bitrise, I'd suggest that you try it out. They have a generous trial program and a free offering as well. It's easy enough to setup for a simple build process to determine if it meets your needs. All in all, you could reasonably explore it within a few hours. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Bitrise helps us solve the CI/CD pipeline for mobile development. Building on the developer desktop for every commit is too costly in resources and time. Bitrise helps us transfer this to the cloud where builds can happen in parallel and also get deployed automatically. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is a really nice tool for anything that isn't too important, but for code that is critical for product functionality and protected as a trade secret is not an option, it is flexible and very useful with many features, and a system with a lot of features is harder to fully secure. It is a tradeoff I would love to use this for all our internal code, but the possibility of an internal attacker increases with a tool as open and feature rich as GitLab. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Keep your GitLab implementation besides a company intranet and you'll fend against 90% of the attackers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

All my company code that is not highly confidential goes into GitLab. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Semaphore v2 is still somewhat of a young product and as such there are a few rough spots in terms of features, but they are not nearly enough to make me reconsider using the product as it is today.

Specifically, I found the following things to be a bit rough:

* The artifact tool is a bit tricky, sometimes getting tripped up on certain filenames and not restoring a file to its original location. Fairly easy to work around, but more work than it should be.

* No high-level project health dashboard like we had in Semaphore v1 (or pretty much any tool). We can make dashboards, but they are all very commit-centric which doesn't work as well for managers and architects that just want to keep an eye on the basics

* The permissions model is very rudimentary, and this is a bit of a problem for more security-minded folks. For example, it's not possible to control access to secrets or who can manually deploy code to production. We rely on Github to keep us out of trouble, but I feel like this needs some more development.

* I'm not crazy about all secrets being global - the Semaphore v1 model (global + project secrets) was better IMO for managing large numbers of projects.

* It's not possible to parameterize manual runs. Though best case you don't need this sort of thing in a well-designed CI/CD pipeline, occasionally it's useful for things like hotfixes or rollbacks - exceptional circumstances.

* I can't seem to find a way to navigate the build history for a branch, i.e. scroll through a list of all the commits in order. This is a missing feature that other tools have

* If a pipeline is Stopped abnormally (i.e. neither Passes nor Failed), I have no information to tell me why. I probably should be able to see this info. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Have worked at two companies now using Semaphore to build out pipelines for new AWS serverless projects. The main outputs of this are:

1) We have a hands-off CI/CD solution that Just Works. It requires no dedicated staff to maintain and extending our pipelines (or making new ones) is very easy. Drama-free.

2) It's a great educational tool. It's hard to learn what you need to do to make a solid pipeline fi you've never done it before and often find myself on teams where that's the case. Semaphore is not only a great tool for *building* pipelines, it's also a great tool for teaching people how to build them. The visual pipeline view alone is worth its weight.

3) It is incredibly cost-effective to run Semaphore, for the same reasons it's cost-effective to run serverless - you don't pay for idle. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The lack of proper namespacing makes us a tiny bit uncomfortable with deployments. Anyone with the ability to configure or run a job can extract potentially sensitive credentials from the system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use CircleCI to dynamically build and cache Docker containers while also testing our code and, when/if all tests pass, deploy directly to production. Knowing that a deployment only requires a merge means we can trust our system to update itself and focus instead on writing production code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The paid version is quite expensive. The license model was improved - it formerly was per master and executors which could lead to architecture based on license. Today it is better, now based on users (logged in or committing to SCM) , but with high costs per user, which can lead to hight costs very fast or it might lead you to try to limit number of users or switch some projects back to open source Jenkins losing the clustering advantages for these teams.

Changes and bugfixes sometimes can take a long time if they are important for you but not relevant for (many) other customers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jenkins, the de facto standard for CI, can be a lot more useful with the enterprise plugins and with the clustering option.

You can manage large projects or many teams and projects a lot better than with one large Jenkins (Jenkinstein) or with many small non-connected ones.

Refactoring is made easier by just moving directories/projects around in the cluster.

Jobs can run as if they were on one large Jenkins (i.e. trigger, copy artifacts etc.) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It takes some practice for the real power of LaunchDarkly to "click" for everyone within your org. LaunchDarkly takes user context and targeting rules out of the code and into shared admin interfaces, democratizing these controls. It's a huge time saver and reduces friction between dev and product release cycles. This can be a huge paradigm shift for both dev teams and product managers in order to get it right. The LD team has amazing onboarding and training documents, demos and support staff. Don't miss out, use them to educate your teams early and often! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Code releases ahead of product launches.

2. Demos and sales pitches of new features and products in PROD envs. for 3rd party partnerships. Safe, self service controls for QA, Product and Sales teams.

3. Permanent toggles states for different business channels leveraging common components with slight variations.

4. Wholesale UX flow changes to meet business cases and still maintaining DRY standards in our code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Needs more documentation on the success community so that developers are able to understand the metadata type categories and other user story creation components. Also, would like to find documentation easier. There is an error message I get when a developer does not do a recommit on the feature branch. The error is something about a caching issue with Copado. When I try to research that error message I cannot find any good documentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Be aware of the success community for copado and leverage it as much as possible. Also be sure to install in a dev sandbox for prototyping. Copado can also help you to provide seed data through the advanced data deployments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We are solving so many problems by optimizing Copado. Version control, sprints, releases, code review, etc. All of this is in a centralize place making it easier for developers to track the progress of their user stories and helps to achieve continuous deployment while maintaining stability. Visibility to release packages along with Validations helps us to keep production stable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's very easy to run out of resource. The resource choices are very limited. I think they only have small, mid, and large right now. It would be good if we can custom the resources size to fit a different purpose instead of just 3 choices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If you are using Jenkins, and then it is giving you headache, you should try Codefresh. It'll change your perspective about CICD! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Our CICD process is combined with Github action and Codefresh. We have been using it for about 6 months. The benefit is the stability. It made our release process very smooth. Staging? Prod? No problem just one click away or by scheduled. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

little resources to learn if you are new to this. Also Cron jobs cause little issue to web deployment.At first when you set up the platform command on your local you will get some headache because it requires you to have php installed along with some services turned on. Which I think can be improved but since there whole platform is dependent on php so it has to be there or if they can provide an .exe installer to install on windows so it will be great just a simple installer like software has. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A good platform as a service here you will have a complete control on your machine as if its is your local computer not like others giving you some resources on rent. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I just came to give a try but it has been best giving you a free computer with no restrictions just do what you want to deploy with in a specific size. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There's not much that I dislike about Plesk. I work extensively with Plesk and cPanel. cPanel does seem to be faster than Plesk in terms of performance, and it is one of the only downsides to Plesk I've come across. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Go for it. I don't think you can go wrong with Plesk, it's only competition is cPanel in my opinion. While choosing between the two comes down to preference of use, if you're working on a Windows server, cPanel is not available there and thus really only leaves one option in that environment that I would choose, which is Plesk. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main problems Plesk solves for me are reliable web hosting services such as WordPress management with the WordPress toolkit as well as mail server and database management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Their support was not incredibly helpful the one time we needed to contact them. We were evaluating CodeShip Pro; and they were in a very much sales mode rather than helping us make a proper assessment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is easy to use and well documented, so for the most part, you don't need to reach out to support.

The pricing model could be better. It is based on concurrent builds which is not the most ideal.

The builds run on AWS EC2 instances, and the instance tier is also based on the CodeShip tier. It would be nice if you could have more options to pick and choose. Like having fewer concurrent builds, but a more powerful AWS EC2 instance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We used CodeShip as part of our CI/CD pipeline. Upon a commit to our repo, it runs tests, creates a build, and deploys it to our environments.

It definitely is a good Dev/Ops tool in terms of getting the job done; but it also gives the devs visibility on the state of their code change. (They can when something failed, they know where to look to fix the problem) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Update & Installation Plugins, User rights

This open-source openness allows everyone to develop what they need that's why we have a rich encyclopedia with plugins that we will never use also Jenkins has security issues that we need to each time read the new releases and update the current version

If we need to have a good performance we need to install lots of server slave to execute all jobs in parallel Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Good Product for CI/CD Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One platform to deploy & build multi projects and cross projects with deferent Programmation languages & deferent system Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The navigation took some getting used to, some menu items felt like they meant the same thing, but were different. For instance a board tab, but also another one with the same title. It gets a little confusing for someone new to the product. Even after months of use I get stumped on the navigation sometimes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It centralizes everything we need to finish the job. For example, it has built in support for things we use like node, .NET, JS, and more. We can create tests, run the test, and deploy all in the same program. It's very convenient in that respect. It's also a place where we can all speak on language instead of some people deploying on one program, and others deploying on another. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A new Ansible user will take certain time to understand how to use this platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I used to solve problems regarding deployment of the applications. The benefits of this Ansible automation is once we know how easy it is to manage and configure then it becomes very easy for our next deployments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's expensive compared to let's say an open source tool like Jenkins. Lacking CLI capabilities as well. Could be better integrated with Github since Microsoft already bought this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This is very much recommended to Microsoft dev houses. It provides all the features you'd expect from a DevOps perspective. It doesn't stop non Microsoft dev houses in using this as it is very much agnostic. If you are implementing Agile development workflow, then you are lookin at the right place. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Removing the manual way of deploying and releasing applications. It saves a lot of time by just doing azure pipelines. Severe lack of manpower is also being addressed. No need for administrators doing releases. Developers can now concentrate on just developing and delivering applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing specific that i Disliked but there updated interface is little hard to use from UI Prospective. New UI makes search functionality a bit difficult to use but overall a good one to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

TFS is easy to use and one stop solution for managing sprint, Dev and QA Related activities. Support is also good in case of any issues. Trial version is also available for evaluation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We are looking to use a solution for automatic build deployment and maintaining user story, test cases and bugs at one single place thus TFS is a solution.

We can easily link User stories to the test cases and log a bug against that test cases also. Thus help us to track the story, Dev tasks are also clearly visible against a particular user story which in turn help us to manage and track dev tasks also. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.