Zephyr Alternatives & Competitors
(73)4.1 out of 5
Looking for alternatives to Zephyr? Tons of people want Software Testing Tools to help with version control and scaling. What's difficult is finding out whether or not the tool you choose is right for you. We have compiled a list of Software Testing Tools that reviewers voted best overall compared to Zephyr. Based on reviewer data you can see how Zephyr stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users, and find the best fit for your business. Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Tricentis qTest, QMetry Test Management, and TestRail are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Zephyr.
Top Alternatives to Zephyr
- Micro Focus ALM Quality Center
- Tricentis qTest
- QMetry Test Management
- TestRail
- PractiTest
- TestLink
- Postman
- UserTesting
- Micro Focus ALM Quality Center(115)4.0 out of 5
Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is a set of software products designed for accelerating the delivery of secure, reliable modern applications
Categories in common with Zephyr: - Tricentis qTest(49)4.2 out of 5
Tricentis qTest is a robust test management solution that makes sophisticated functionality available to all testers at an affordable price.
Categories in common with Zephyr: - QMetry Test Management(34)3.9 out of 5
By using QMetry, QA practitioners can help the entire Development team get detailed and granular insights into the state of the Testing cycle, and into other important metrics like Requirements Coverage. QMetry integrates seamlessly with numerous products in adjacent ALM spaces like Defect Tracking, Requirements Management and Test Automation.
Categories in common with Zephyr: - TestRail(322)4.2 out of 5
TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.
Categories in common with Zephyr: - PractiTest(102)4.2 out of 5
Simple Test Management allows you to Manage all Requirements, Tests, Runs & Issues using one platform
Categories in common with Zephyr: - TestLink(51)4.6 out of 5
TestLink Open Source Test Management Application
Categories in common with Zephyr: - Postman(604)4.6 out of 5
Postman is a software that helps developers and companies develope API workflow, it is efficient on Chrome to test, develop and document APIs and create complex requests, go back in time and view results in a beautiful way.
Categories in common with Zephyr: - UserTesting(500)4.5 out of 5
UserTesting’s Human Insight Platform enables companies to see, hear and talk to their customers as they engage with products, apps and messaging. Half of the world’s top 100 brands partner with UserTesting to make more informed decisions based on customer feedback.
Categories in common with Zephyr: - Apache JMeter(84)4.3 out of 5
Apache JMeter desktop application is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance.
Categories in common with Zephyr: - Ranorex Studio(223)4.2 out of 5
Ranorex Studio allows you to set-up robust test automation scripts for a wide range of desktop, web and mobile applications. For managing and executing automated tests, Ranorex Studio provides a comprehensive range of test automation tools based on standard programming techniques and languages, making them ideal for teams of all sizes.
Categories in common with Zephyr: - Sauce Labs(128)4.3 out of 5
Sauce's test automation cloud enables QA/QE and developers to easilybperform functional, Javascript unit, and manual tests with Selenium and Appium on web and mobile apps, in 500+ browser/OS combinations. Get videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready
Categories in common with Zephyr: - ServiceNow Now Platform(248)4.0 out of 5
The Now Platform delivers a System of Action for the enterprise. Using a single data model, it makes it easy to create contextual workflows and automate business processes. The platform's Intelligent Automation Engine combines machine learning with automated actions to dramatically reduce costs and speed time‑to‑resolution.
Categories in common with Zephyr: - Cypress(71)4.9 out of 5
Cypress offers a test engine that runs unit and integration tests in a browser.
Categories in common with Zephyr: - Test Collab(15)3.7 out of 5
Test Collab is a tool which helps you manage your tests and make testing process smooth and fast for your team.
Categories in common with Zephyr: - LambdaTest(116)4.8 out of 5
LambdaTest is scalable cloud based platform designed to offer all software testing needs to cloud infrastructure.
Categories in common with Zephyr: - AWS X-Ray(14)4.0 out of 5
AWS X-Ray is a distributed tracking system designed to help developers analyze and debug production, distributed applications, such as those built using a microservices architecture.
Categories in common with Zephyr: - SpiraTest(30)4.3 out of 5
Powerful and Flexible Test Management with Real-Time Reporting
Categories in common with Zephyr: - Qase(26)4.5 out of 5
Qase makes it easy to manage test cases, compose test plans and perform test runs as an individual or in a team.
Categories in common with Zephyr: - Tricentis Tosca(37)4.2 out of 5
Tricentis Tosca enables companies to test and assess business-critical enterprise applications with unprecedented effectiveness and efficiency.
Categories in common with Zephyr: - IBM Engineering Test Management(24)4.0 out of 5
IBM® Rational Quality Manager™ is a collaborative, web-based, quality management solution that offers comprehensive test planning and test asset management from requirements to defects. Built on the Jazz platform, it enables teams to seamlessly share information. It uses automation to speed project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. It can also be purchased as part of the Collaborative Lifecycle Management solution—a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Rational Team Concert, IBM Rational Quality Manager and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation.
Categories in common with Zephyr:
#1
II
Fast lab configuration and good reporting system
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is:
More expensive
#2
VM
Facile to maintain the test case and test suite in this tool and you can import the requirements from the project management tool such as jira to qTest by simply tagging in Jira Board.
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, Tricentis qTest is:
More usable
Easier to do business with
More expensive
#3
AC
Ability to maintain requirements, test cases and defects and also to link it all up to effectively trace the test coverage
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, QMetry Test Management is:
Easier to do business with
Better at support
#4
AS
- project customizable. Meaning if we have 20 project, and not for all of them we need to use TestRail we can Test Rail only for the ones we need to. Paying for the number we are actually using,...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, TestRail is:
More usable
Easier to do business with
Better at meeting requirements
#5
EM
The ability to organize test case library into folders for a default storage location, and then use filters to create more complex, specialized views of cases. This is very helpful when creating...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, PractiTest is:
Better at support
More usable
Easier to do business with
#6
HR
Straight forward to use and write the Test Cases in Testlink Web application and easy to pair the test cases with the requirement specifications. We could smoothly identify the test case by just...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, TestLink is:
Better at meeting requirements
More usable
Better at support
#7
UC
Postman is that unique tool that can single handedly manage all your REST API testing needs. It has a slick UI, ease of functionality is great and the ability to switch between request types is...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, Postman is:
More usable
Easier to set up
Better at meeting requirements
#8
UF
The UserTesting panel has been invaluable for doing research with more agility. I don't have to pay for additional users, and this is huge for me. I also like how quick studies can fill when I have...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, UserTesting is:
More expensive
Better at support
More usable
#9
UC
The ease of configuring the JMeter for testing API's
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, Apache JMeter is:
Better at meeting requirements
Easier to set up
#10
UB
Any one can create and run tests, very easy
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, Ranorex Studio is:
More expensive
More usable
Easier to do business with
#11
UC
It has a variety of platforms and devices that we can choose from. The great thing is that SauceLabs support appium and mobile devices testing. We currently have some web product so testing the...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, Sauce Labs is:
More expensive
Better at meeting requirements
More usable
#12
UI
I don’t like this platform so much. I think I like that we can easily log in
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, ServiceNow Now Platform is:
More expensive
Better at meeting requirements
More usable
#13
UC
The information is given when running the tests, the easy setup and time-travelling when stuff goes wrong
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, Cypress is:
More usable
Better at meeting requirements
Better at support
#14
AJ
Very usable UI compared to other solutions in the same price point, and still prettier than Zephyr standalone. Workflows out of the box are very simple and the ability to create templates is...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, Test Collab is:
Better at support
More usable
#15
RA
The most helpful is the simplicity for large-scale testing plus care that the team has with its customers in listening, attending and providing the service offered.
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, LambdaTest is:
More usable
Easier to do business with
Better at support
#16
UP
The thing I like best about amazon work solutions is that it is very innovative
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, AWS X-Ray is:
Better at support
More usable
Better at meeting requirements
#17
ŠJ
Very simple and intuitive tool, where user can learn work effectively within few hours . Good graphical interface.
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, SpiraTest is:
Easier to do business with
Better at meeting requirements
Better at support
#18
JL
Free for maximum 3 users team;
User experience is generally good
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, Qase is:
More usable
Better at support
Easier to do business with
#19
AH
Tosca is the best tool for the people who struggle with coding, and it is powerful than other scriptless automation tools.
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, Tricentis Tosca is:
More expensive
More usable
Better at meeting requirements
#20
AW
There are many options out of the box for a person to use. There are features to make sure you can get the correct data and reporting you need for your project.
Reviewers say compared to Zephyr, IBM Engineering Test Management is:
More expensive
Better at meeting requirements
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy