# Top 10 ActiveBatch Alternatives &amp; Competitors
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 236
Research alternative solutions to ActiveBatch on G2, with real user reviews on competing tools. Workload Automation Software is a widely used technology, and many people are seeking high quality, productive software solutions with parallel processing, data chunker, and big data connectors. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to ActiveBatch include integration and tasks. The best overall ActiveBatch alternative is Stonebranch. Other similar apps like ActiveBatch are JAMS Scheduler, Control-M, GoAnywhere MFT, and Progress MOVEit. ActiveBatch alternatives can be found in [Workload Automation Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/workload-automation) but may also be in [Managed File Transfer (MFT) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) or [Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/electronic-data-interchange-edi).


## Best Paid &amp; Free Alternatives to ActiveBatch
  - [Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/products/stonebranch/reviews)
  - [JAMS Scheduler](https://www.g2.com/products/jams-scheduler/reviews)
  - [Control-M](https://www.g2.com/products/control-m/reviews)
  - [GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/products/goanywhere-mft/reviews)
  - [Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-moveit/reviews)
  - [Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/products/cleo-integration-cloud/reviews)
  - [PagerDuty](https://www.g2.com/products/pagerduty/reviews)
  - [IBM Db2](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-db2/reviews)
  - [Workato](https://www.g2.com/products/workato/reviews)
  - [Appian](https://www.g2.com/products/appian/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternatives to ActiveBatch Recently Reviewed By G2 Community
Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how ActiveBatch stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current &amp; previous users in industries like Information Technology and Services, Insurance, and Automotive, and find the best product for your business.


  ### 1. [Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/products/stonebranch/reviews)
By Stonebranch, Inc
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 129
Stonebranch is a modern, efficient automation solution to drive immediate business processing manageable from any web-enabled device.


Reviewers say compared to ActiveBatch, Stonebranch is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
- Easier to do business with
Categories in common with ActiveBatch: [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft), [Workload Automation](https://www.g2.com/categories/workload-automation)

**Compare:** [ActiveBatch vs Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-stonebranch)
**Compare Stonebranch with other alternatives:**
- [Stonebranch vs JAMS Scheduler](https://www.g2.com/compare/jams-scheduler-vs-stonebranch)
- [Stonebranch vs Control-M](https://www.g2.com/compare/control-m-vs-stonebranch)
- [Stonebranch vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-stonebranch)
- [Stonebranch vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-stonebranch)
- [Stonebranch vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-stonebranch)
- [Stonebranch vs PagerDuty](https://www.g2.com/compare/pagerduty-vs-stonebranch)
- [Stonebranch vs IBM Db2](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-db2-vs-stonebranch)
- [Stonebranch vs Workato](https://www.g2.com/compare/stonebranch-vs-workato)
- [Stonebranch vs Appian](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-stonebranch)

  ### 2. [JAMS Scheduler](https://www.g2.com/products/jams-scheduler/reviews)
By JAMS Software, LLC
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 270
JAMS is an enterprise job scheduling and workload automation solution, designed to automate IT tasks that businesses need to run on a regular basis and with a high degree of certainty.


Reviewers say compared to ActiveBatch, JAMS Scheduler is:
- Better at support
- Easier to do business with
- Easier to set up
Categories in common with ActiveBatch: [Workload Automation](https://www.g2.com/categories/workload-automation)

**Compare:** [ActiveBatch vs JAMS Scheduler](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-jams-scheduler)
**Compare JAMS Scheduler with other alternatives:**
- [JAMS Scheduler vs Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/compare/jams-scheduler-vs-stonebranch)
- [JAMS Scheduler vs Control-M](https://www.g2.com/compare/control-m-vs-jams-scheduler)
- [JAMS Scheduler vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-jams-scheduler)
- [JAMS Scheduler vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/jams-scheduler-vs-progress-moveit)
- [JAMS Scheduler vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-jams-scheduler)
- [JAMS Scheduler vs PagerDuty](https://www.g2.com/compare/jams-scheduler-vs-pagerduty)
- [JAMS Scheduler vs IBM Db2](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-db2-vs-jams-scheduler)
- [JAMS Scheduler vs Workato](https://www.g2.com/compare/jams-scheduler-vs-workato)
- [JAMS Scheduler vs Appian](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-jams-scheduler)

  ### 3. [Control-M](https://www.g2.com/products/control-m/reviews)
By BMC Software
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 176
Control-M simplifies application workflow orchestration. It makes it easy to define, schedule, manage and monitor workflows, ensuring visibility and reliability, and improving SLAs.


Reviewers say compared to ActiveBatch, Control-M is:
- More expensive
Categories in common with ActiveBatch: [Workload Automation](https://www.g2.com/categories/workload-automation)

**Compare:** [ActiveBatch vs Control-M](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-control-m)
**Compare Control-M with other alternatives:**
- [Control-M vs Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/compare/control-m-vs-stonebranch)
- [Control-M vs JAMS Scheduler](https://www.g2.com/compare/control-m-vs-jams-scheduler)
- [Control-M vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/control-m-vs-goanywhere-mft)
- [Control-M vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/control-m-vs-progress-moveit)
- [Control-M vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-control-m)
- [Control-M vs PagerDuty](https://www.g2.com/compare/control-m-vs-pagerduty)
- [Control-M vs IBM Db2](https://www.g2.com/compare/control-m-vs-ibm-db2)
- [Control-M vs Workato](https://www.g2.com/compare/control-m-vs-workato)
- [Control-M vs Appian](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-control-m)

  ### 4. [GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/products/goanywhere-mft/reviews)
By Fortra
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 456
GoAnywhere MFT is a managed file transfer solution which automates and secures file transfers using a centralized enterprise-level approach.


Reviewers say compared to ActiveBatch, GoAnywhere MFT is:
- Easier to admin
- Easier to set up
- Easier to do business with
Categories in common with ActiveBatch: [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft)

**Compare:** [ActiveBatch vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-goanywhere-mft)
**Compare GoAnywhere MFT with other alternatives:**
- [GoAnywhere MFT vs Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-stonebranch)
- [GoAnywhere MFT vs JAMS Scheduler](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-jams-scheduler)
- [GoAnywhere MFT vs Control-M](https://www.g2.com/compare/control-m-vs-goanywhere-mft)
- [GoAnywhere MFT vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-progress-moveit)
- [GoAnywhere MFT vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-goanywhere-mft)
- [GoAnywhere MFT vs PagerDuty](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-pagerduty)
- [GoAnywhere MFT vs IBM Db2](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-ibm-db2)
- [GoAnywhere MFT vs Workato](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-workato)
- [GoAnywhere MFT vs Appian](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-goanywhere-mft)

  ### 5. [Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-moveit/reviews)
By Progress Software
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 529
Exchanging files over the Internet shouldn’t be complicated. That’s why more than 40 million users from around the world rely on MOVEit – The Managed File Transfer Software from Progress to simplify and secure the file transfer tasks, save time, and improve communications.


Reviewers say compared to ActiveBatch, Progress MOVEit is:
- Easier to set up
- Easier to admin
- Easier to do business with
Categories in common with ActiveBatch: [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft)

**Compare:** [ActiveBatch vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-progress-moveit)
**Compare Progress MOVEit with other alternatives:**
- [Progress MOVEit vs Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-stonebranch)
- [Progress MOVEit vs JAMS Scheduler](https://www.g2.com/compare/jams-scheduler-vs-progress-moveit)
- [Progress MOVEit vs Control-M](https://www.g2.com/compare/control-m-vs-progress-moveit)
- [Progress MOVEit vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-progress-moveit)
- [Progress MOVEit vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-progress-moveit)
- [Progress MOVEit vs PagerDuty](https://www.g2.com/compare/pagerduty-vs-progress-moveit)
- [Progress MOVEit vs IBM Db2](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-db2-vs-progress-moveit)
- [Progress MOVEit vs Workato](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-workato)
- [Progress MOVEit vs Appian](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-progress-moveit)

  ### 6. [Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/products/cleo-integration-cloud/reviews)
By Cleo
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 598
Cleo Integration Cloud is an ecosystem integration platform that makes it easy to build, automate and manage B2B, application, cloud, and data integrations. It&#39;s scalable, intuitive, and requires no custom code or specialized skillsets to manage daily integration operations.


Categories in common with ActiveBatch: [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft)

**Compare:** [ActiveBatch vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-cleo-integration-cloud)
**Compare Cleo Integration Cloud with other alternatives:**
- [Cleo Integration Cloud vs Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-stonebranch)
- [Cleo Integration Cloud vs JAMS Scheduler](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-jams-scheduler)
- [Cleo Integration Cloud vs Control-M](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-control-m)
- [Cleo Integration Cloud vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-goanywhere-mft)
- [Cleo Integration Cloud vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-progress-moveit)
- [Cleo Integration Cloud vs PagerDuty](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-pagerduty)
- [Cleo Integration Cloud vs IBM Db2](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-ibm-db2)
- [Cleo Integration Cloud vs Workato](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-workato)
- [Cleo Integration Cloud vs Appian](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-cleo-integration-cloud)

  ### 7. [PagerDuty](https://www.g2.com/products/pagerduty/reviews)
By PagerDuty
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 972
PagerDuty is an end-to-end incident management and response platform that provides developers, IT operations, and business stakeholders the insights they need to resolve and prevent business-impacting incidents quickly. PagerDuty makes it easy to monitor your infrastructure, set up on-call schedules, establish escalation policies, create automated workflows, and alert the right people at the right time.


Categories in common with ActiveBatch: [Workload Automation](https://www.g2.com/categories/workload-automation)

**Compare:** [ActiveBatch vs PagerDuty](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-pagerduty)
**Compare PagerDuty with other alternatives:**
- [PagerDuty vs Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/compare/pagerduty-vs-stonebranch)
- [PagerDuty vs JAMS Scheduler](https://www.g2.com/compare/jams-scheduler-vs-pagerduty)
- [PagerDuty vs Control-M](https://www.g2.com/compare/control-m-vs-pagerduty)
- [PagerDuty vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-pagerduty)
- [PagerDuty vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/pagerduty-vs-progress-moveit)
- [PagerDuty vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-pagerduty)
- [PagerDuty vs IBM Db2](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-db2-vs-pagerduty)
- [PagerDuty vs Workato](https://www.g2.com/compare/pagerduty-vs-workato)
- [PagerDuty vs Appian](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-pagerduty)

  ### 8. [IBM Db2](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-db2/reviews)
By IBM
**Average Rating:** 4.1/5
**Total Reviews:** 683
IBM® Db2® is the database that offers enterprise-wide solutions handling high-volume workloads. It is optimized to deliver industry-leading performance while lowering costs.


Reviewers say compared to ActiveBatch, IBM Db2 is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
Categories in common with ActiveBatch: [Data Warehouse Automation](https://www.g2.com/categories/data-warehouse-automation)

**Compare:** [ActiveBatch vs IBM Db2](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-ibm-db2)
**Compare IBM Db2 with other alternatives:**
- [IBM Db2 vs Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-db2-vs-stonebranch)
- [IBM Db2 vs JAMS Scheduler](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-db2-vs-jams-scheduler)
- [IBM Db2 vs Control-M](https://www.g2.com/compare/control-m-vs-ibm-db2)
- [IBM Db2 vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-ibm-db2)
- [IBM Db2 vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-db2-vs-progress-moveit)
- [IBM Db2 vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-ibm-db2)
- [IBM Db2 vs PagerDuty](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-db2-vs-pagerduty)
- [IBM Db2 vs Workato](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-db2-vs-workato)
- [IBM Db2 vs Appian](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-ibm-db2)

  ### 9. [Workato](https://www.g2.com/products/workato/reviews)
By Workato
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 777
The only intelligent automation platform that enables both business users and IT to build, operate and rollout app and data integration, process and workflow automation, in a single platform - without compromising security and governance.


Reviewers say compared to ActiveBatch, Workato is:
- Easier to set up
- Easier to do business with
- Easier to admin
Categories in common with ActiveBatch: [Process Orchestration](https://www.g2.com/categories/process-orchestration)

**Compare:** [ActiveBatch vs Workato](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-workato)
**Compare Workato with other alternatives:**
- [Workato vs Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/compare/stonebranch-vs-workato)
- [Workato vs JAMS Scheduler](https://www.g2.com/compare/jams-scheduler-vs-workato)
- [Workato vs Control-M](https://www.g2.com/compare/control-m-vs-workato)
- [Workato vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-workato)
- [Workato vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-workato)
- [Workato vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-workato)
- [Workato vs PagerDuty](https://www.g2.com/compare/pagerduty-vs-workato)
- [Workato vs IBM Db2](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-db2-vs-workato)
- [Workato vs Appian](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-workato)

  ### 10. [Appian](https://www.g2.com/products/appian/reviews)
By Appian
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 502
Appian provides a leading low-code software development platform that enables organizations to rapidly develop powerful and unique applications. The applications created on Appian’s platform help companies drive digital transformation and competitive differentiation. For more information, visit www.appian.com.


Reviewers say compared to ActiveBatch, Appian is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
- Easier to set up
Categories in common with ActiveBatch: [Process Orchestration](https://www.g2.com/categories/process-orchestration)

**Compare:** [ActiveBatch vs Appian](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-appian)
**Compare Appian with other alternatives:**
- [Appian vs Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-stonebranch)
- [Appian vs JAMS Scheduler](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-jams-scheduler)
- [Appian vs Control-M](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-control-m)
- [Appian vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-goanywhere-mft)
- [Appian vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-progress-moveit)
- [Appian vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-cleo-integration-cloud)
- [Appian vs PagerDuty](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-pagerduty)
- [Appian vs IBM Db2](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-ibm-db2)
- [Appian vs Workato](https://www.g2.com/compare/appian-vs-workato)


---
## ActiveBatch Alternatives FAQs

### How does ActiveBatch compare to Stonebranch?

According to G2 data, both [ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/products/activebatch/reviews) and [Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/products/stonebranch/reviews) hold an equal average rating of 4.5 out of 5, with ActiveBatch having a larger review base of 231 compared to Stonebranch&#39;s 129. ActiveBatch scores higher in meeting requirements (9.3 vs 8.8), usability (8.9 vs 8.7), ease of setup (8.4 vs 8.2), and ease of administration (8.7 vs 8.4), each with a margin of 0.2 to 0.5 points. Both products share identical scores in support (8.9) and ease of doing business (9.0). User feedback highlights ActiveBatch&#39;s strengths in workflow automation (17 mentions), automation (15 mentions), and scheduling (7 mentions), while Stonebranch is praised for ease of use (24 mentions), automation (17 mentions), and customer support (12 mentions). Both platforms face complexity and learning curve challenges, with ActiveBatch noted for a steeper learning curve and a denser UI, whereas Stonebranch users report occasional UI sluggishness and documentation gaps. Integration capabilities are strong for both, with ActiveBatch noted for broad application integration and Stonebranch for hybrid environment scalability and SAP integration. Overall, ActiveBatch excels in advanced workflow customization and integration depth, while Stonebranch offers a more intuitive interface and faster onboarding for new users.



### What are the best alternatives to ActiveBatch?

The best alternatives to ActiveBatch based on G2 user ratings and review counts include [Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/products/stonebranch/reviews) (4.5/5 stars, 129 reviews), [JAMS](https://www.g2.com/products/jams-software-llc-jams/reviews) (4.5/5 stars, 257 reviews), and [GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/products/goanywhere-mft/reviews) (4.6/5 stars, 435 reviews). Other notable alternatives are [Control-M](https://www.g2.com/products/control-m/reviews) (4.3/5 stars, 156 reviews), [Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-moveit/reviews) (4.4/5 stars, 527 reviews), and [Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/products/cleo-integration-cloud/reviews) (4.4/5 stars, 575 reviews). These alternatives offer strong workload automation, scheduling, and integration capabilities with varying focuses such as managed file transfer, cloud integration, and enterprise job scheduling.



### Which Workload Automation tools do reviewers recommend instead of ActiveBatch?

Reviewers recommend [Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/products/stonebranch/reviews) for its ease of use, centralized job scheduling, real-time monitoring, and strong support, making it suitable for hybrid and cloud environments. [JAMS](https://www.g2.com/products/jams-software-llc-jams/reviews) is favored for its comprehensive job scheduling, automation, and reliable support, with strong cross-platform capabilities and ease of setup. [GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/products/goanywhere-mft/reviews) is highly recommended for secure, automated file transfers with powerful workflow automation, centralized management, and robust security features. [Control-M](https://www.g2.com/products/control-m/reviews) is praised for its centralized visibility, reliable automation, and strong workflow orchestration across complex environments. [Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-moveit/reviews) is noted for its ease of use, security, and dependable automation of file transfers. [Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/products/cleo-integration-cloud/reviews) is valued for simplifying complex EDI and API integrations with real-time visibility and strong support. These tools are recommended for enterprises seeking robust workload automation with varying strengths in usability, integration, and security.



### Why do users choose Stonebranch over ActiveBatch?

Users choose [Stonebranch](https://www.g2.com/products/stonebranch/reviews) over ActiveBatch primarily for its ease of use and faster onboarding experience, as evidenced by 24 mentions praising its user-friendly interface and intuitive design. Stonebranch&#39;s real-time monitoring, centralized job scheduling, and strong integration capabilities, including native SAP connectors and hybrid cloud support, enhance operational efficiency and scalability. Customers appreciate Stonebranch&#39;s responsive customer support (12 mentions) and effective documentation that simplifies initial setup and migration, reducing onboarding time from months to weeks. Additionally, Stonebranch&#39;s modern, SaaS-based platform and event-driven automation features appeal to organizations seeking flexible, cloud-friendly solutions. Despite some critiques on documentation and UI improvements, Stonebranch&#39;s combination of usability, integration breadth, and support responsiveness drives user preference over ActiveBatch, especially for teams prioritizing quick deployment and ease of management.




## Explore Articles
- [What is the top-rated retail task management tool that integrates with an existing POS system so task triggers and store performance data stay connected in one place?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-top-rated-retail-task-management-tool-that-integrates-with-an-existing-pos-system-so-task-triggers-and-store-performance-data-stay-connected-in-one-place)
- [Leading customer relationship tool for software companies](https://www.g2.com/discussions/crm-leading-customer-relationship-tool-for-software-companies)
- [What are the best education HR platforms for higher education faculty tracking across teaching, research, service, and accreditation reporting?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-best-education-hr-platforms-for-higher-education-faculty-tracking-across-teaching-research-service-and-accreditation-reporting)
- [Which partner ecosystem software is the best for tracking partner-sourced and partner-influenced revenue so partnerships can actually prove their contribution to the business?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-partner-ecosystem-software-is-the-best-for-tracking-partner-sourced-and-partner-influenced-revenue-so-partnerships-can-actually-prove-their-contribution-to-the-business)
- [Top relational database options for small businesses](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-top-relational-database-options-for-small-businesses)
- [Vaccine Tracking](https://www.g2.com/articles/g2-introduces-new-vaccine-tracking-software-category)

## Spotlight Categories
- [Digital Experience Platforms (DXP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/digital-experience-platforms-dxp)
- [Talent Assessment Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/talent-assessment-software)
- [Email Marketing Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/email-marketing)

