Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare SOLIDWORKS and Simcenter Femap 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CMS IntelliCAD
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (62.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
SOLIDWORKS
Star Rating
(621)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SOLIDWORKSSimcenter Femap
Star Rating
(16)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (62.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Simcenter FemapSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviews say that SOLIDWORKS excels in 3D/solid modeling tools, scoring a remarkable 9.2, which users appreciate for its intuitive interface and robust features like the "FeatureManager" that simplifies complex designs. In contrast, Simcenter Femap, with a score of 8.3, is noted for its strong finite element analysis capabilities but lacks the same level of modeling finesse.
- Users report that SOLIDWORKS offers superior drawing tools, achieving an 8.9 rating, which reviewers highlight as beneficial for creating detailed technical drawings quickly. Meanwhile, Simcenter Femap's drawing tools score only 7.3, with users mentioning that they find them less user-friendly and lacking in advanced features.
- Reviewers mention that SOLIDWORKS has a higher ease of use score (8.6) compared to Simcenter Femap (7.9), with many users praising its straightforward navigation and comprehensive tutorials that help new users get up to speed quickly.
- Users on G2 highlight that while SOLIDWORKS has a solid quality of support score (8.1), Simcenter Femap outperforms it with an 8.5, with reviewers noting that Femap's support team is responsive and knowledgeable, particularly in addressing complex simulation queries.
- G2 users report that SOLIDWORKS shines in ease of setup with a score of 8.0, making it accessible for small businesses, while Simcenter Femap's score of 7.7 indicates a slightly more complicated installation process that some users find challenging.
- Users say that both products have their strengths in task management, with SOLIDWORKS scoring 8.3 and Simcenter Femap at 8.7. However, reviewers mention that Femap's task management features are particularly effective for simulation workflows, making it a preferred choice for users focused on finite element analysis.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
SOLIDWORKS
No pricing availableSimcenter Femap
No pricing availableFree Trial
SOLIDWORKS
No trial information availableSimcenter Femap
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
516
8.5
8
Ease of Use
8.6
520
7.9
14
Ease of Setup
8.2
92
7.7
8
Ease of Admin
7.9
46
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
457
8.5
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
46
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
511
8.3
7
Features by Category
CAD to CAM
9.1
41
Not enough data
8.8
41
Not enough data
8.9
41
Not enough data
CNC Programming
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.4
36
Not enough data
Machining
8.6
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
Design
9.4
99
Not enough data
9.4
99
Not enough data
9.3
95
Not enough data
8.1
95
Not enough data
Edit
8.5
94
Not enough data
8.3
87
Not enough data
9.3
94
Not enough data
8.3
82
Not enough data
Collaboration
8.6
91
Not enough data
9.0
92
Not enough data
8.4
87
Not enough data
Library
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
CAD
8.9
23
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
Integration
8.5
25
Not enough data
9.6
27
Not enough data
8.5
23
Not enough data
Data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.2
24
Not enough data
8.9
24
Not enough data
8.1
22
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
Logistics
9.1
25
Not enough data
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
8.8
60
Not enough data
8.6
46
Not enough data
8.4
51
Not enough data
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
7.6
54
Not enough data
8.6
58
Not enough data
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
7.6
48
Not enough data
8.8
57
Not enough data
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
7.7
47
Not enough data
8.6
52
Not enough data
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
6.1
19
Not enough data
6.1
19
Not enough data
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Options
8.8
43
Not enough data
9.1
42
Not enough data
9.0
41
Not enough data
9.3
43
Not enough data
8.3
34
Not enough data
8.2
40
Not enough data
Tools
9.4
42
Not enough data
9.0
40
Not enough data
9.2
42
Not enough data
Design
9.4
42
Not enough data
Design
7.7
11
Not enough data
7.7
11
Not enough data
Tools
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
Library
8.1
12
Not enough data
Platform
8.5
12
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
Customization
7.6
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
Design
9.2
59
8.3
5
9.0
59
7.3
5
8.8
59
7.8
6
7.6
58
Not enough data
Tools
7.9
52
Not enough data
7.9
54
9.2
6
7.3
47
Not enough data
Work
7.5
40
Not enough data
7.8
41
Not enough data
8.2
48
Not enough data
8.1
43
Not enough data
8.4
46
8.3
5
Environment
8.3
52
7.7
5
8.4
50
8.7
5
8.2
48
Not enough data
8.6
52
Not enough data
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
9.0
24
Not enough data
7.6
24
Not enough data
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.3
24
Not enough data
8.2
23
Not enough data
7.8
25
Not enough data
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
7.5
22
Not enough data
8.2
22
Not enough data
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
7.8
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
SOLIDWORKS and Simcenter Femap are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
SOLIDWORKS is categorized as Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD), General-Purpose CAD, CAD Viewers, Sketching, PCB Design, Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM), CAD Libraries, CAD Data Exchange, and Additive Manufacturing
Simcenter Femap has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
SOLIDWORKS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Simcenter Femap
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
22.7%
Design
12.1%
Automotive
6.6%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
6.0%
Medical Devices
5.8%
Other
46.9%
Aviation & Aerospace
18.8%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
12.5%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Defense & Space
12.5%
Semiconductors
6.3%
Other
37.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is SOLIDWORKS used for?
3 Comments
YP
SOLIDWORKS IS USED FOR MULTIPLE WORK LIKE 2D & 3D CAD MODELING, ASSEMBLY MODELING, SHWWET METAL MODELING, SURFACE MODELING, RENDERING, SIMULATION, 3D...Read more
best use o this software
2 Comments
OS
Making 2D sketches and extruding them to make 3d sketches.Read more
Simcenter Femap has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
