Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare SOLIDWORKS and Shapr3D 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CMS IntelliCAD
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (84.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
SOLIDWORKS
Star Rating
(618)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SOLIDWORKSShapr3D
Star Rating
(168)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (84.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SOLIDWORKS excels in its CAD-CAM compatibility with a score of 8.8, making it a strong choice for users needing seamless integration between design and manufacturing processes. In contrast, Shapr3D, while offering solid CAD capabilities, does not emphasize CAM integration as strongly, which may limit its appeal for users focused on manufacturing workflows.
- Reviewers mention that Shapr3D shines in ease of use, scoring 9.5 compared to SOLIDWORKS's 8.6. Users appreciate Shapr3D's intuitive interface and touch-based controls, which make it particularly appealing for beginners and those who prefer a more hands-on approach to 3D modeling.
- G2 users highlight the superior quality of support for Shapr3D, with a score of 9.3, compared to SOLIDWORKS's 8.1. Reviewers often mention the responsiveness and helpfulness of Shapr3D's support team, which can be crucial for users who may encounter challenges during their design processes.
- Users on G2 report that SOLIDWORKS offers robust drawing and modeling tools, both scoring 9.4, which are essential for detailed engineering designs. Reviewers say that the extensive features available in SOLIDWORKS cater well to professional engineers, providing a depth of functionality that Shapr3D, with its scores of 9.5 in both areas, may not fully match in terms of advanced capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Shapr3D's free entry-level price is a significant advantage, allowing users to explore its features without financial commitment. In contrast, SOLIDWORKS does not offer a free version, which may deter small businesses or individual users from trying it out.
- Users report that while SOLIDWORKS has a strong focus on mechanical computer-aided design (MCAD) with high scores in 3D modeling tools and editing tools, Shapr3D's cloud-based platform offers flexibility and accessibility that appeals to users who need to work on-the-go or collaborate remotely.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
SOLIDWORKS
No pricing availableShapr3D
Free
Free
Try Shapr3D for free for an unlimited period
- 2 designs
- Access Shapr3D on iPad, Mac, and Windows
- Import - X_T, X_B, IGES, STEP, STL, SLDPRT, SLDASM, SHAPR, DXF, DWG, Image
Free Trial
SOLIDWORKS
No trial information availableShapr3D
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
514
9.0
115
Ease of Use
8.6
518
9.4
116
Ease of Setup
8.1
90
9.0
35
Ease of Admin
7.9
46
9.9
13
Quality of Support
8.1
455
9.3
81
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
46
9.7
13
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
510
9.0
94
Features by Category
CAD to CAM
9.1
41
Not enough data
8.8
41
Not enough data
8.9
41
Not enough data
CNC Programming
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.4
36
Not enough data
Machining
8.6
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
Design
9.4
98
9.5
83
9.4
98
9.4
84
9.3
94
9.3
83
8.1
94
8.4
71
Edit
8.5
93
8.4
78
8.3
86
9.2
73
9.3
93
9.4
79
8.3
81
8.8
68
Collaboration
8.6
90
7.6
48
9.0
91
8.2
56
8.4
86
7.7
50
Library
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
CAD
8.9
23
Not enough data
9.4
28
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
Integration
8.5
25
Not enough data
9.6
26
Not enough data
8.5
23
Not enough data
Data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.2
24
Not enough data
8.9
24
Not enough data
8.1
22
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
Logistics
9.1
25
Not enough data
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
8.8
60
Not enough data
8.6
46
Not enough data
8.4
51
Not enough data
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
7.6
54
Not enough data
8.6
58
Not enough data
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
7.6
48
Not enough data
8.8
57
Not enough data
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
7.7
47
Not enough data
8.6
52
Not enough data
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
6.1
19
Not enough data
6.1
19
Not enough data
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Options
8.8
42
Not enough data
9.1
41
Not enough data
9.0
41
Not enough data
9.3
42
Not enough data
8.3
34
Not enough data
8.2
40
Not enough data
Tools
9.4
41
Not enough data
9.0
39
Not enough data
9.1
41
Not enough data
Design
9.4
41
Not enough data
Design
7.7
11
Not enough data
7.7
11
Not enough data
Tools
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
Library
8.1
12
Not enough data
Platform
8.5
12
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
Customization
7.6
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
Design
9.2
59
Not enough data
9.0
59
Not enough data
8.8
59
Not enough data
7.6
58
Not enough data
Tools
7.9
52
Not enough data
7.9
54
Not enough data
7.3
47
Not enough data
Work
7.5
40
Not enough data
7.8
41
Not enough data
8.2
48
Not enough data
8.1
43
Not enough data
8.4
46
Not enough data
Environment
8.3
52
Not enough data
8.4
50
Not enough data
8.2
48
Not enough data
8.6
52
Not enough data
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
9.2
23
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
9.2
23
Not enough data
9.0
23
Not enough data
7.5
23
Not enough data
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.4
23
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.2
23
Not enough data
7.8
23
Not enough data
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
7.5
22
Not enough data
8.2
22
Not enough data
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
7.8
22
Not enough data
8.8
22
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
SOLIDWORKS and Shapr3D are categorized as General-Purpose CAD
Unique Categories
SOLIDWORKS is categorized as Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD), Simulation & CAE, CAD Viewers, Sketching, PCB Design, Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM), CAD Libraries, CAD Data Exchange, and Additive Manufacturing
Shapr3D has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
SOLIDWORKS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Shapr3D
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
22.8%
Design
12.0%
Automotive
6.6%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
6.0%
Medical Devices
5.8%
Other
46.8%
Design
14.8%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
8.6%
Furniture
6.8%
Higher Education
5.6%
Construction
4.9%
Other
59.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is SOLIDWORKS used for?
3 Comments
YP
SOLIDWORKS IS USED FOR MULTIPLE WORK LIKE 2D & 3D CAD MODELING, ASSEMBLY MODELING, SHWWET METAL MODELING, SURFACE MODELING, RENDERING, SIMULATION, 3D...Read more
best use o this software
2 Comments
OS
Making 2D sketches and extruding them to make 3d sketches.Read more
What can you do with Shapr3D?
9 Comments
SR
Due to the short learning curve and ability to create quick and dimension-accurate designs, Shapr3D becomes an extension of your imagination.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
