Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Olive and OpenText Application Quality Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Inventive.AI
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$5,000.00 With One-Time Purchase
No pricing available
Olive
Star Rating
(57)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$5,000.00 With One-Time Purchase
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a high 9.1, which allows for efficient management and organization of test cases. In contrast, Olive's repository features are less emphasized, leading to a lower overall user satisfaction in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Olive shines in Ease of Setup with a score of 9.1, making it more user-friendly for new teams. OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a score of 7.2, is noted for having a steeper learning curve, which can be a barrier for some users.
- G2 users highlight Olive's superior Quality of Support, scoring 9.2, which is frequently praised for responsiveness and helpfulness. In comparison, OpenText ALM Quality Center's support, rated at 7.7, is seen as less reliable, with some users expressing frustration over response times.
- Reviewers say that OpenText ALM Quality Center offers robust Test Diversity features, scoring 9.3, which is beneficial for teams needing to manage various testing types. Olive, while functional, does not provide the same level of diversity, leading to a less comprehensive testing experience.
- Users on G2 report that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Reporting capabilities are strong, with a score of 8.9, allowing for detailed insights into testing processes. However, Olive's reporting features, while adequate, do not match the depth and customization options available in OpenText.
- Users mention that Olive's Automation features, scoring 8.1, are user-friendly and effective for streamlining testing processes. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while offering automation, is perceived as more complex, which can hinder its usability for teams looking for straightforward solutions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Olive
RFP Starter - $5,000 USD
$5,000.00
With One-Time Purchase
Effortlessly initiate a single sourcing project with no commitments. This package is designed for quick turnarounds.
- 1 RFP Project
- 6 months access
- Unlimited internal users
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Olive
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
47
8.2
118
Ease of Use
8.4
47
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
9.1
24
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
9.0
24
7.2
59
Quality of Support
9.2
40
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
24
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.2
45
6.8
116
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
RFP Generation
8.3
24
Not enough data
7.4
20
Not enough data
7.4
18
Not enough data
7.6
26
Not enough data
RFP Distribution
8.3
26
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
Submissions
8.6
28
Not enough data
7.8
26
Not enough data
8.4
26
Not enough data
8.2
26
Not enough data
RFP Response
7.9
26
Not enough data
8.0
25
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.1
24
Not enough data
7.8
22
Not enough data
7.9
19
Not enough data
Agentic AI - RFP
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Supplier Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Contract Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Data Collection
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Project Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Strategic Sourcing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.6
19
Not enough data
9.7
20
Not enough data
9.2
18
Not enough data
Communication
8.6
18
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
Procedural
8.5
12
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Olive and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Requirements Management
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Olive
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
10.7%
Computer Software
10.7%
Consulting
8.9%
Financial Services
8.9%
Restaurants
7.1%
Other
53.6%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Olive has no discussions with answers
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
