Users report that MindManager excels in mind mapping capabilities, with a score of 9.0, making it a preferred choice for users focused on brainstorming and organizing ideas visually. In contrast, Miro, while strong in collaborative editing, scores lower in mind mapping at 7.9.
Reviewers mention that Miro shines in collaborative editing features, scoring an impressive 9.4, which allows teams to work together in real-time. MindManager, however, scores 7.9 in this area, indicating it may not be as effective for teams needing seamless collaboration.
G2 users highlight that MindManager's desktop availability is a strong point, scoring 9.2, which is beneficial for users who prefer a robust desktop experience. Miro, with a score of 8.8, offers a good desktop app but may not match the depth of MindManager's features.
Users on G2 report that Miro's mobile application is more user-friendly, scoring 7.6 compared to MindManager's 6.4. This makes Miro a better option for users who need to access their work on the go.
Reviewers mention that MindManager's task management features are rated at 8.7, which is beneficial for users looking for structured project management. Miro's task management, while still effective, scores slightly lower at 8.4, indicating a potential gap in functionality for project-focused users.
Users say that Miro's community forum and customer ideation features, scoring 7.0 and 7.8 respectively, provide a platform for user engagement and feedback, which is less emphasized in MindManager, where community support scores lower at 6.9.
Idea generation (brainstorming). Idea visualisation (emphasis on "show" rather than "tell"). Idea communication (share with team & other stakeholders). Idea...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.