Compare Maze and Prolific
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.2% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Maze
Star Rating
(111)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 2 pricing plans
Prolific
Star Rating
(237)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Prolific
Summary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Prolific excels in user satisfaction, reflected in its higher G2 Score compared to Maze. Users appreciate Prolific's prompt payment and the quality of participant selection, which enhances the reliability of their studies.
- Users say that Maze offers a seamless experience for testing designs and prototypes, with integrations for tools like Figma and Adobe XD. This capability allows teams to validate ideas before development, making it a strong choice for user research.
- Reviewers mention that Prolific's customer service is top-notch, with quick responses to issues. This level of support is particularly beneficial for users who may encounter problems during their studies, ensuring a smoother experience overall.
- According to verified reviews, Maze stands out for its intuitive interface and powerful reporting features. Users highlight how easy it is to manage feedback and generate reports, which aids in making informed decisions based on user research data.
- G2 reviewers note that while both platforms are user-friendly, Maze has a slight edge in ease of setup, making it easier for new users to get started quickly. This is particularly valuable for teams looking to implement user research tools without extensive training.
- Users express that Prolific is particularly effective for recruiting participants quickly, especially for longitudinal studies. This efficiency is a significant advantage for researchers needing timely data collection, although some users feel that Maze's capabilities in user testing are equally robust.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Maze
Free
Free
For individuals looking to kickstart usability testing, at no cost.
- 1 study per month
- 5 seats
- Pay-per use panel credits
Prolific
No pricing availableFree Trial
Maze
Free Trial is available
Prolific
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.1
77
8.9
183
Ease of Use
8.9
77
8.9
188
Ease of Setup
9.5
32
8.9
113
Ease of Admin
9.1
28
9.1
34
Quality of Support
8.7
62
7.8
153
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
22
9.4
32
Product Direction (% positive)
8.4
64
8.7
183
Features by Category
User Response Methods
8.4
57
8.8
154
7.5
21
5.6
126
6.0
12
5.4
122
Feature Not Available
5.7
124
8.4
52
7.2
135
Participant Selection
7.6
37
6.7
129
Feature Not Available
4.8
118
7.6
11
5.5
118
7.1
31
8.2
145
Insights
8.2
56
7.0
127
8.2
46
6.8
132
7.8
43
6.5
126
Generative AI
6.7
10
5.8
74
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
7.4
20
Not enough data
7.6
21
Not enough data
7.2
20
Not enough data
6.9
20
Admin
Not enough data
6.7
19
Quality
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Automation
Not enough data
5.3
6
Not enough data
5.0
6
Image Annotation
Not enough data
4.4
6
Not enough data
5.3
5
Not enough data
4.7
5
Not enough data
5.7
5
Natural Language Annotation
Not enough data
6.7
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
5.8
6
Speech Annotation
Not enough data
5.3
5
Not enough data
5.7
5
Management
8.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Survey Management
9.8
9
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
9.4
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
Process Management
9.2
8
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.6
8
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
System Management
9.3
9
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Integration - Machine Learning
Not enough data
Not enough data
Learning - Machine Learning
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Maze and Prolific are categorized as User Research
Unique Categories
Maze is categorized as Enterprise Feedback Management and User Research Repositories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Maze
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Prolific
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
13.9%
Financial Services
10.2%
Information Technology and Services
10.2%
Design
9.3%
Retail
3.7%
Other
52.8%
Research
40.5%
Higher Education
37.4%
Education Management
5.6%
Mental Health Care
1.5%
Marketing and Advertising
1.5%
Other
13.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What can you use maze for?
1 Comment
SJ
Unmoderated usability tests & surveysRead more
What is Maze software?
1 Comment
SJ
Maze is a software built to conduct unmoderated usability tests, with the possibility of including different types of questions beyond the usability test...Read more
Maze has no more discussions with answers
Prolific has no discussions with answers
