Maze Pricing Overview

Yes. According to G2 data, Maze offers a free plan with limited features. Users can upgrade to paid plans for additional capabilities. Visit the seller's official pricing page to compare plan options and features.

Maze's pricing is best suited for product designers, UX researchers, and small-to-mid-market software teams that run frequent unmoderated usability tests and prototype validations. G2 reviewers from small businesses in computer software, design, and health and wellness praise the free tier for early-stage testing and Figma integration. Mid-market reviewers across financial services, banking, and insurance represent the heaviest usage segment, citing weekly testing cadences and stakeholder reporting as core needs. Maze's Enterprise tier targets larger organizations in banking, manufacturing, automotive, and telecommunications that require SSO, private workspaces, interview studies, and dedicated support. Solo designers and students also appear frequently among free-tier G2 reviewers validating academic or early-career projects.

Maze's free tier limits users to one study per month, five seats, up to seven blocks, and pay-per-use panel credits, making it viable for individuals or occasional testing but restrictive for teams with regular research cadences. Maze's Enterprise tier, priced via custom quote, adds panel credits, SSO, private workspaces, advanced panel targeting, interview studies, custom branding, enhanced security, custom legal terms, and a dedicated customer success manager. G2 reviewers note the free plan works well for early validation and Figma prototype testing, but teams running weekly studies or requiring participant recruitment at scale consistently find the free tier's study cap the primary driver for upgrading to Maze's paid Enterprise offering.

G2 reviewers broadly regard Maze as strong value, particularly for small businesses and product teams running frequent unmoderated testing. The free tier's single-study-per-month cap and pay-per-use panel credits are flagged as the main friction point driving upgrades. Reviewers in financial services, banking, and software consistently cite time savings, fast participant recruitment, and auto-generated reports as justifying cost. G2 reviews of Maze from enterprise users highlight consolidated research workflows and AI features as premium differentiators. A few reviewers note the jump from free directly to Enterprise contact-for-pricing as a gap, with one insurance-sector reviewer explicitly flagging the lack of mid-tier options as a drawback.