What do you like best about Prolific?
I’ve been using Prolific for paid research studies, and the main thing I like is that the pay is generally much better than other survey websites. I usually find studies that work out to around $15–$20 per hour, which makes it useful for earning some extra money on the side.
The website is simple to use. I can log in, check the available studies, see the estimated time and payment, and choose the ones I’m interested in. The study matching also saves me time because many studies are matched to my profile and interests.
One thing I find interesting is the range of research available on Prolific. There are studies connected with universities, research labs, and researchers from different parts of the world. I’ve also come across different AI-related studies, including research involving AI systems, human interaction with AI, and how people use or evaluate AI. This makes the available studies more interesting than just regular surveys.
From a performance point of view, the website has generally worked smoothly for me. Pages load properly, and I can move between available studies, my submissions, and payment information without much trouble.
I also like the payment system because the reward is clearly shown before starting a study. Even when I’m screened out of some studies, I’ve received a small amount for the time spent on screening, usually around $0.25–$1. The screening itself normally takes only a couple of minutes.
The sign-up process was easy for me, and I didn’t need much help to understand how the platform works. I like that I can use it independently and decide which studies I want to participate in.
Overall, Prolific has become useful for me as a side-income option. The combination of reasonable pay, a simple interface, research studies from universities and labs, AI-related studies, and a straightforward payment process makes it different from the usual survey websites I’ve tried. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about Prolific?
I think Prolific could improve the number and variety of studies available. There are a decent number of studies, but many are first come, first served, so they can disappear quickly once enough participants have joined. Some studies also have very specific eligibility requirements and are limited to a small group of participants, which means there may not always be a suitable study available. The application process was easy to understand, but getting approved required a strong profile and took around 5–7 business days. It would be helpful if there were more studies available for a wider range of participants and more opportunities throughout the day. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.