G2 reviewers report that eMaint CMMS excels in overall user satisfaction, reflected in its higher G2 Score compared to L2L. Users appreciate its versatility, noting that it significantly improves asset allocation and scheduling for field service technicians.
Users say that eMaint CMMS offers a more streamlined experience for managing work orders and resources, with one reviewer highlighting its ability to centralize various management tasks in one platform, complemented by a robust mobile app.
Reviewers mention that while L2L is intuitive and easy to navigate, especially with features like filters for dispatches, it still falls short in overall satisfaction compared to eMaint. Users appreciate L2L's creative structure and customer service but note that it lacks some of the comprehensive features found in eMaint.
According to verified reviews, eMaint CMMS shines in customer support, receiving high praise for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Users have reported quick and straightforward processes for adding new assets and following work orders, which enhances daily usability.
G2 reviewers highlight that L2L's admin features, such as local password policy changes, are beneficial, but overall, it struggles with some advanced functionalities that eMaint CMMS provides, particularly in asset management and predictive maintenance capabilities.
Users report that eMaint CMMS has a more favorable implementation process, with many finding it easier to set up and integrate into their existing workflows. In contrast, while L2L is noted for its ease of use, some users feel it could benefit from additional features to enhance its functionality.
Requestor Logins: Each work requestor has a unique eMaint login that allows them to submit requests, and view the history of their requests.
Email...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.