Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Jira and OpenText Application Quality Management 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.8% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Users Per Month
No pricing available
Jira
Star Rating
(7,327)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Users Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Jira excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to OpenText Application Quality Management. Users appreciate its robust project management capabilities, highlighting features like customizable workflows and effective task tracking.
- Users say that Jira's implementation process is notably quick and intuitive, making it easy for teams to get started. Recent feedback emphasizes how users find it valuable for managing everything from backlog creation to user stories, which enhances their productivity right from the start.
- Reviewers mention that while OpenText Application Quality Management provides a comprehensive approach to managing the software development lifecycle, it may not match the flexibility and ease of use that Jira offers. Users appreciate how Jira allows for agile project management, adapting quickly to changing requirements.
- According to verified reviews, Jira's support quality stands out, with users rating it highly for responsiveness and helpfulness. In contrast, OpenText Application Quality Management's support is seen as adequate but not as strong, which can impact user experience during critical project phases.
- Users highlight that Jira's extensive user base and high volume of recent reviews contribute to a wealth of shared knowledge and community support, making it easier for new users to find solutions and best practices. OpenText Application Quality Management, with fewer reviews, may not offer the same level of community engagement.
- Reviewers note that while OpenText Application Quality Management is praised for its structured approach to requirements gathering and defect tracking, Jira's flexibility and user-friendly interface often lead to a more satisfying day-to-day experience for teams looking to streamline their workflows.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Jira
Free
Free
10 Users Per Month
Free forever for 10 users
- Unlimited goals, projects, tasks, and forms
- Backlog, list, board, timeline, calendar, and summary views
- Reports and dashboards
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Jira
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
5,977
8.2
118
Ease of Use
8.1
6,051
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
8.0
2,267
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
7.6
1,484
7.2
59
Quality of Support
8.3
4,668
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
1,347
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.4
5,804
6.8
116
Features by Category
Tasks
9.2
638
Not enough data
8.9
614
Not enough data
9.1
624
Not enough data
8.7
606
Not enough data
8.5
582
Not enough data
8.2
579
Not enough data
8.5
592
Not enough data
8.4
528
Not enough data
Projects
8.9
603
Not enough data
8.7
565
Not enough data
8.2
544
Not enough data
8.4
550
Not enough data
8.6
564
Not enough data
7.7
490
Not enough data
9.2
558
Not enough data
8.3
548
Not enough data
8.0
484
Not enough data
8.1
495
Not enough data
8.6
546
Not enough data
Resource Management
8.3
525
Not enough data
8.3
535
Not enough data
8.5
527
Not enough data
Project Monitoring
8.4
516
Not enough data
8.4
525
Not enough data
8.7
558
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.4
456
Not enough data
7.5
453
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Project Management
7.4
321
Not enough data
7.7
323
Not enough data
7.8
335
Not enough data
7.6
318
Not enough data
7.6
323
Not enough data
7.5
321
Not enough data
7.9
328
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
8.8
1817
8.3
11
8.8
1773
9.2
12
8.9
1848
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
8.6
1761
9.0
12
8.9
1869
9.2
12
8.8
1739
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
7.6
274
Not enough data
7.7
277
Not enough data
7.7
275
Not enough data
Responses
9.4
36
Not enough data
9.4
36
Not enough data
9.4
36
Not enough data
Automation - AI Agents
8.9
35
Not enough data
9.0
34
Not enough data
9.0
35
Not enough data
9.4
35
Not enough data
9.3
35
Not enough data
Platform
9.3
36
Not enough data
9.4
37
Not enough data
9.3
36
Not enough data
Autonomy - AI Agents
9.0
35
Not enough data
9.1
35
Not enough data
9.2
35
Not enough data
9.0
35
Not enough data
Generative AI
9.2
38
Not enough data
9.1
35
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
8.4
2704
Not enough data
8.2
2562
Not enough data
8.2
2473
Not enough data
Planning
8.7
3184
Not enough data
8.8
3265
Not enough data
8.8
3005
Not enough data
8.7
3132
Not enough data
8.3
2692
Not enough data
Workflow Management
8.6
3049
Not enough data
8.8
3335
Not enough data
7.9
2303
Not enough data
8.4
2537
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Jira and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
Jira is categorized as Product Management, Project Management, and AI Agents For Business Operations
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Jira
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Computer Software
23.7%
Financial Services
4.6%
Internet
4.3%
Marketing and Advertising
4.1%
Other
39.3%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Discussions
Is Jira a good tool?
12 Comments
MP
Yes, It's very useful, Just start on it and give some time on that.Read more
What are the features of JIRA?
11 Comments
CS
Allows you to setup your project as your team/company flows thru the agile process. You can see what is next in the sprint, where others are, enter your...Read more
How is Jira transforming project management practices in agile software development teams?
8 Comments
VC
help teams plan sprints, manage backlogsRead more
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
