Compare Jira and OpenText Application Quality Management 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Users Per Month
No pricing available
Jira
Star Rating
(7,607)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Users Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Jira excels in task organization, with users highlighting its ability to customize workflows for tasks, bugs, and sprints. This flexibility allows teams to effectively manage their projects and track progress through various stages, making it a preferred choice for many.
- Users say that OpenText Application Quality Management provides a comprehensive solution for managing the software development life cycle. Reviewers appreciate its structured approach to requirements gathering, defect logging, and tracking, which helps streamline processes from start to finish.
- According to verified reviews, Jira's implementation process is notably quick and intuitive, with many users praising the onboarding experience. This ease of setup contributes to a smoother transition for teams looking to adopt a new bug tracking system.
- Reviewers mention that while OpenText Application Quality Management is effective in managing various aspects of software development, some users find it less user-friendly compared to Jira. The feedback suggests that while it offers robust features, the overall usability could be improved for a better user experience.
- G2 reviewers highlight that Jira's support quality is a significant advantage, with users noting responsive assistance and helpful resources. This level of support enhances user satisfaction and helps teams resolve issues more efficiently.
- Users report that OpenText Application Quality Management is convenient and accessible, making it suitable for a wide range of users. However, some feedback indicates that it may not be as adaptable to specific workflows as Jira, which could limit its effectiveness for certain teams.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Jira
Free
Free
10 Users Per Month
Free forever for 10 users
- Unlimited goals, projects, tasks, and forms
- Backlog, list, board, timeline, calendar, and summary views
- Reports and dashboards
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Jira
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
6,189
8.2
118
Ease of Use
8.1
6,272
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
8.0
2,474
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
7.6
1,591
7.2
59
Quality of Support
8.3
4,860
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
1,452
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.4
6,006
6.8
116
Features by Category
Tasks
9.3
666
Not enough data
9.0
620
Not enough data
9.1
642
Not enough data
8.8
606
Not enough data
8.5
572
Not enough data
8.2
565
Not enough data
8.5
587
Not enough data
8.4
512
Not enough data
Projects
8.9
603
Not enough data
8.7
551
Not enough data
8.2
531
Not enough data
8.4
541
Not enough data
8.6
555
Not enough data
7.7
475
Not enough data
9.2
595
Not enough data
8.3
530
Not enough data
8.0
463
Not enough data
8.1
484
Not enough data
8.6
546
Not enough data
Resource Management
8.3
506
Not enough data
8.3
530
Not enough data
8.4
513
Not enough data
Project Monitoring
8.4
504
Not enough data
8.4
513
Not enough data
8.8
567
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.4
441
Not enough data
7.5
439
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Project Management
7.4
310
Not enough data
7.7
309
Not enough data
7.9
337
Not enough data
7.6
308
Not enough data
7.6
313
Not enough data
7.4
309
Not enough data
7.9
321
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
8.8
1781
8.3
11
8.7
1733
9.2
12
8.9
1822
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
8.6
1727
9.0
12
8.9
1839
9.2
12
8.8
1706
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
7.6
255
Not enough data
7.7
256
Not enough data
7.6
256
Not enough data
Responses
9.5
37
Not enough data
9.4
37
Not enough data
9.4
37
Not enough data
Automation - AI Agents
8.9
36
Not enough data
9.1
35
Not enough data
9.0
36
Not enough data
9.4
36
Not enough data
9.4
36
Not enough data
Platform
9.4
37
Not enough data
9.5
41
Not enough data
9.3
38
Not enough data
Autonomy - AI Agents
9.0
36
Not enough data
9.2
36
Not enough data
9.2
36
Not enough data
9.1
36
Not enough data
Generative AI
9.1
40
Not enough data
9.2
37
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
8.4
2685
Not enough data
8.2
2538
Not enough data
8.1
2442
Not enough data
Planning
8.7
3166
Not enough data
8.8
3279
Not enough data
8.8
3049
Not enough data
8.7
3222
Not enough data
8.3
2667
Not enough data
Workflow Management
8.6
3033
Not enough data
8.9
3454
Not enough data
7.9
2276
Not enough data
8.4
2509
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Jira and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
Jira is categorized as Product Management, Project Management, and AI Agents For Business Operations
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Jira
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
23.7%
Computer Software
23.7%
Financial Services
4.7%
Marketing and Advertising
4.1%
Internet
4.1%
Other
39.7%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Discussions
Is Jira a good tool?
12 Comments
MN
Yes, it is. It's good for having an area to house all tasks required for a scope of work. Read more
What are the features of JIRA?
11 Comments
CS
Allows you to setup your project as your team/company flows thru the agile process. You can see what is next in the sprint, where others are, enter your...Read more
How is Jira transforming project management practices in agile software development teams?
9 Comments
SN
With jira we were able to streamline team collaboration by showing the actual status of all the team effort in jira timeline while we conduct Scrum...Read more
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
or continue with
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
