Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Jira and OpenText Application Quality Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Zoho Projects
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Users Per Month
No pricing available
Jira
Star Rating
(7,124)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Users Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Jira excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows teams to efficiently manage and organize their test cases. In contrast, OpenText ALM Quality Center does not have a specific score for this feature, indicating a potential gap in test management capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Jira's integration capabilities are rated at 8.1, making it easier to connect with various tools and platforms, which is crucial for teams using multiple software solutions. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while strong in bug monitoring, does not highlight integration as a key feature, which may limit its flexibility in diverse environments.
- G2 users highlight Jira's superior Test Diversity score of 9.3, which reflects its ability to support various testing methodologies and frameworks. This is particularly beneficial for teams that require adaptability in their testing processes, whereas OpenText ALM Quality Center does not provide a comparable score in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Jira's user feedback mechanisms, such as User Reports & Feedback (8.8) and Tester Reports & Feedback (8.7), foster better communication and collaboration among team members. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while scoring well in Tester Reports (9.1), does not match the overall engagement seen in Jira's feedback features.
- Users on G2 appreciate Jira's robust Workflow Management features, particularly its Kanban Board (8.8) and Custom Workflows (8.6), which enhance task organization and visibility. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while offering solid bug monitoring, lacks the same level of workflow customization, which may hinder agile project management.
- Reviewers say that Jira's Planning features, such as Work Capacity (8.7) and Task Ranking (8.7), provide teams with essential tools for effective project management. In comparison, OpenText ALM Quality Center does not emphasize these planning capabilities, which could impact teams' ability to prioritize and allocate resources effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Jira
Free
Free
10 Users Per Month
Free forever for 10 users
- Unlimited goals, projects, tasks, and forms
- Backlog, list, board, timeline, calendar, and summary views
- Reports and dashboards
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Jira
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
5,850
8.2
118
Ease of Use
8.1
5,918
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
7.9
2,142
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
7.6
1,458
7.2
59
Quality of Support
8.3
4,553
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
1,320
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.4
5,679
6.8
116
Features by Category
Tasks
9.2
589
Not enough data
8.9
587
Not enough data
9.1
587
Not enough data
8.7
579
Not enough data
8.4
562
Not enough data
8.2
560
Not enough data
8.5
573
Not enough data
8.4
518
Not enough data
Projects
8.9
568
Not enough data
8.7
552
Not enough data
8.1
528
Not enough data
8.4
538
Not enough data
8.6
544
Not enough data
7.7
480
Not enough data
9.1
507
Not enough data
8.3
536
Not enough data
8.0
476
Not enough data
8.1
485
Not enough data
8.6
520
Not enough data
Resource Management
8.3
517
Not enough data
8.3
523
Not enough data
8.4
519
Not enough data
Project Monitoring
8.4
507
Not enough data
8.3
516
Not enough data
8.7
532
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.4
444
Not enough data
7.5
446
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Project Management
7.4
314
Not enough data
7.7
316
Not enough data
7.8
317
Not enough data
7.6
312
Not enough data
7.6
316
Not enough data
7.5
316
Not enough data
7.9
320
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
8.8
1802
8.3
11
8.7
1761
9.2
12
8.8
1833
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
8.6
1749
9.0
12
8.9
1847
9.2
12
8.8
1725
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
7.7
264
Not enough data
7.7
267
Not enough data
7.7
264
Not enough data
Responses
9.4
35
Not enough data
9.3
35
Not enough data
9.3
35
Not enough data
Automation - AI Agents
8.8
34
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.9
34
Not enough data
9.3
34
Not enough data
9.3
34
Not enough data
Platform
9.2
35
Not enough data
9.3
35
Not enough data
9.2
35
Not enough data
Autonomy - AI Agents
8.8
34
Not enough data
9.0
34
Not enough data
9.1
34
Not enough data
9.0
34
Not enough data
Generative AI
9.1
35
Not enough data
9.1
35
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
8.4
2683
Not enough data
8.2
2542
Not enough data
8.1
2453
Not enough data
Planning
8.7
3152
Not enough data
8.8
3232
Not enough data
8.8
2964
Not enough data
8.7
3065
Not enough data
8.3
2673
Not enough data
Workflow Management
8.6
3020
Not enough data
8.8
3265
Not enough data
7.9
2284
Not enough data
8.4
2519
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Jira and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
Jira is categorized as Product Management, Project Management, and AI Agents For Business Operations
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Jira
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
24.0%
Computer Software
23.6%
Financial Services
4.5%
Internet
4.3%
Marketing and Advertising
4.1%
Other
39.3%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Discussions
Is Jira a good tool?
12 Comments
MP
Yes, It's very useful, Just start on it and give some time on that.Read more
What are the features of JIRA?
11 Comments
CS
Allows you to setup your project as your team/company flows thru the agile process. You can see what is next in the sprint, where others are, enter your...Read more
How is Jira transforming project management practices in agile software development teams?
7 Comments
VC
help teams plan sprints, manage backlogsRead more
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
