Reviews say that Eqvista excels in ease of setup with a score of 9.6, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a quick onboarding process, while Pulley, with a score of 8.9, has been noted by users as having a more complex setup that may require additional time and resources.
Users report that Eqvista's reporting capabilities are highly rated at 9.5, with specific praise for its intuitive reporting features that allow for easy data analysis. In contrast, Pulley’s reporting received a lower score of 8.7, with reviewers mentioning that it lacks some advanced reporting functionalities that Eqvista offers.
Reviewers mention that Eqvista's dashboard functionality is particularly strong, scoring 9.7, which users appreciate for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive overview of equity management. Pulley, however, scored 9.1, with users indicating that its dashboard could benefit from more customization options.
G2 users highlight Eqvista's cap table management feature, scoring 9.5, as a standout aspect, with many noting its simplicity and effectiveness in tracking equity ownership. Pulley, while scoring slightly higher at 9.7, has been critiqued by users for its more complex navigation in cap table management.
Users on G2 report that both products have strong quality of support, each scoring 9.8, but reviewers mention that Eqvista's support is more responsive and helpful, particularly for new users needing guidance, while Pulley’s support is noted for being slower at times.
Reviewers mention that both platforms have a solid score for equity governance, with Eqvista at 9.6 and Pulley at 9.2. However, users report that Eqvista provides clearer documentation and resources, making it easier for users to understand governance processes compared to Pulley.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.