When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found ConnectALL easier to use and do business with overall. However, reviewers preferred the ease of set up with MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, along with administration.
Reviewers felt that ConnectALL meets the needs of their business better than MuleSoft Anypoint Platform.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that ConnectALL is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform over ConnectALL.
What integration alternatives to ConnectALL exist?
2 Comments
Official Response from ConnectALL
Most of our new ConnectALL users were employing a home-grown, custom-code approach and were seeking an off-the-shelf solution because of the high cost of...Read more
What is the ConnectALL Integration Platform comprised of?
1 Comment
Official Response from ConnectALL
ConnectALL is an integration platform that comes with ConnectALL Core comprising the engine and graphical user interface (GUI), and Application Adapters that...Read more
Does ConnectALL support enterprise requirements?
1 Comment
Official Response from ConnectALL
ConnectALL is enterprise-ready. It is the only solution that offers:
clustering (including load sharing and failover)
guaranteed message...Read more
As the name suggests, iPaaS is a development platform for building integration applications. It provides a set of services and capabilities for integrating...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.