Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Eptura Engage and Eptura Visitor 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Envoy Workplace
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Accruent EMS
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OfficeSpace Software
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (56.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Eptura Engage
Star Rating
(170)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Eptura EngageEptura Visitor
Star Rating
(172)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (56.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Eptura VisitorSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Proxyclick excels in Ease of Use with a score of 9.5, making it intuitive for new users, while Condeco, with a score of 8.7, has been noted by reviewers as having a steeper learning curve.
- Reviewers mention that Proxyclick's Visitor Check-In process is seamless and efficient, scoring 9.3, which users appreciate for its simplicity compared to Condeco's similar feature, which also scores 9.3 but lacks some of the customization options that Proxyclick offers.
- G2 users highlight Proxyclick's superior Customization options, particularly in enhancing maps and themes, with scores of 9.3 and 9.0 respectively, while Condeco's customization features are perceived as more limited, leading to less flexibility in user experience.
- Users on G2 report that Proxyclick's Quality of Support is highly rated at 9.3, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, whereas Condeco's support, rated at 8.6, has received mixed feedback regarding response times.
- Reviewers mention that Proxyclick's Real-Time Availability feature, scoring 9.0, is particularly beneficial for managing space efficiently, while Condeco's similar feature, although rated at 9.1, lacks the same level of integration with other tools that Proxyclick provides.
- Users say that Proxyclick's Visitor Database and reporting capabilities are robust, with a score of 8.9, allowing for better analytics and insights, while Condeco's database features, rated at 8.1, are seen as less comprehensive, limiting the ability to track visitor trends effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Eptura Engage
No pricing availableEptura Visitor
No pricing availableFree Trial
Eptura Engage
No trial information availableEptura Visitor
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
108
9.3
142
Ease of Use
8.6
111
9.5
142
Ease of Setup
8.1
72
8.9
90
Ease of Admin
8.2
68
9.1
92
Quality of Support
8.7
96
9.4
121
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
69
9.3
89
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
99
8.5
137
Features by Category
Customization
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Logistics - Digital Wayfinding
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Wayfinding
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Booking
8.3
48
Not enough data
8.8
52
Not enough data
9.1
52
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
Generative AI
6.4
6
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
6.4
6
Not enough data
6.4
6
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Meeting Room Booking Systems
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform tools
8.8
47
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.8
45
Not enough data
Administration
8.3
44
Not enough data
8.0
32
Not enough data
8.3
33
Not enough data
8.5
45
Not enough data
Platform Basics
Not enough data
9.3
88
Not enough data
8.7
53
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
9.6
8
Platform Data
Not enough data
8.9
69
Not enough data
8.8
77
Not enough data
9.0
81
Not enough data
9.0
85
Platform Interoperability
Not enough data
9.3
86
Not enough data
9.0
77
Platform Additional Functionality
Not enough data
8.5
53
Additional Functionality - Visitor Management
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Agentic AI - Visitor Management
Not enough data
6.7
5
Facility Booking
9.0
24
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
8.3
17
Not enough data
8.4
19
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
Office Maps
9.1
20
Not enough data
8.4
21
Not enough data
8.2
17
Not enough data
Workplace Analytics
8.6
19
Not enough data
8.1
14
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administrative Tools
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
14
Not enough data
8.8
15
Not enough data
Generative AI
5.7
5
Not enough data
5.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Space Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Seating Options
7.9
14
Not enough data
7.6
14
Not enough data
8.2
13
Not enough data
8.3
17
Not enough data
Tech Stack
8.7
19
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
7.5
17
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
Generative AI
5.4
8
Not enough data
5.5
7
Not enough data
5.5
7
Not enough data
5.5
7
Not enough data
Notifications
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaborative Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Hybrid Enablement
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Eptura Engage and Eptura Visitor share no categories
Unique Categories
Eptura Engage is categorized as Hybrid Enablement, Desk Booking, Space Management, Digital Wayfinding, and Meeting Room Booking Systems
Eptura Visitor is categorized as Visitor Management and Emergency Notification
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Eptura Engage
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Eptura Visitor
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
8.4%
Banking
6.0%
Marketing and Advertising
5.4%
Financial Services
4.8%
Telecommunications
4.2%
Other
71.1%
Information Technology and Services
5.5%
Hospitality
5.5%
Financial Services
3.6%
Food Production
3.0%
Automotive
3.0%
Other
79.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
Eptura Engage has no discussions with answers
Is there a contract?
3 Comments
MG
Yes there is a contract and the company is great to work with. Read more
How do I improve printing speed on badge printing?
1 Comment
DR
If you have a guest coming you should have them come 5 min early and prepare them for the process of printing their badge. Let them know that old badges will...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
