Users report that Propertybase's Ease of Use is rated at 5.8, which is significantly lower than BackAgent's 8.9. Reviewers mention that navigating Propertybase can be cumbersome, while BackAgent is praised for its intuitive interface.
Reviewers say that Propertybase struggles with Quality of Support, scoring only 6.1, compared to BackAgent's 8.1. Users on G2 highlight that BackAgent's support team is responsive and helpful, whereas Propertybase users often feel left without adequate assistance.
G2 users mention that Propertybase's Transaction Management features are lacking, with a score of 5.0, while BackAgent excels in this area with a more robust offering. Users appreciate BackAgent's streamlined transaction processes, which help in managing deals more efficiently.
Users say that Propertybase's Document Management capabilities are rated at 9.6, indicating a strong feature set, but BackAgent's overall Contract Management is rated a perfect 10. Reviewers mention that BackAgent's contract tools are particularly user-friendly and effective.
Reviewers mention that Propertybase's Lead Generation tools score 6.4, which is decent, but BackAgent's integration with social media and CRM systems enhances its lead generation capabilities, leading to a more effective outreach strategy.
Users report that while Propertybase has a higher entry-level price of $69 user/month, BackAgent's affordability at $1.50 user/month makes it a more attractive option for small businesses, as noted by many reviewers who appreciate the value for money.
No, SFDC is far too complicated. A real estate agency would need at least 1 dedicated Admin to manage it and make it operational. PropertyBase is terrible.Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.