Users report that OpenText Documentum excels in File Type Support with a rating of 9.3, allowing for a wide variety of document formats, while AODocs, although strong, does not match this level of versatility.
Reviewers mention that AODocs shines in Ease of Use with a score of 8.1, making it more user-friendly for everyday tasks compared to OpenText Documentum's lower score of 6.9, which can lead to a steeper learning curve.
G2 users highlight that OpenText Documentum has a robust Device Management feature rated at 9.4, which is particularly beneficial for enterprises needing strict control over document access across devices, whereas AODocs, while competent, does not offer the same level of granularity.
Users on G2 report that AODocs provides superior Collaboration features, particularly in Simultaneously Editing with a score of 8.9, allowing multiple users to work on documents in real-time, which is a critical feature for teams.
Reviewers mention that OpenText Documentum's Quality of Support is rated at 7.1, which some users find lacking compared to AODocs' higher score of 8.4, indicating a more responsive and helpful support team.
Users say that AODocs has a better Performance and Reliability rating of 8.9, which translates to fewer downtimes and a smoother user experience, while OpenText Documentum's performance is perceived as less reliable by some users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AODocs
Enterprise Folders
$
/ User / Year
Use Google Drive as your enterprise file server, with granular folder permissions and easy integration with desktop . applications thanks to the Universal File Opener.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.