Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Ansys LS-DYNA and SOLIDWORKS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CMS IntelliCAD
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Ansys LS-DYNA
Star Rating
(45)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Ansys LS-DYNASOLIDWORKS
Star Rating
(621)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SOLIDWORKSSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SOLIDWORKS excels in 3D/solid modeling tools with a score of 9.7, making it a preferred choice for detailed design work. In contrast, Ansys LS-DYNA scores lower at 7.1 in multibody dynamics, indicating it may not be as robust for complex modeling tasks.
- Reviewers mention that SOLIDWORKS offers superior drawing tools, scoring 9.7, which enhances the drafting process significantly. Ansys LS-DYNA, however, has a lower score of 7.4 in drawing tools, suggesting it may lack some of the advanced features that users expect for detailed documentation.
- G2 users highlight that SOLIDWORKS provides excellent CAD-CAM compatibility with a score of 8.8, facilitating smoother transitions from design to manufacturing. Conversely, Ansys LS-DYNA does not focus on CAD-CAM integration, which may hinder workflow efficiency for users needing seamless data exchange.
- Users on G2 report that SOLIDWORKS has a strong library management system, scoring 8.9 for categorization and search capabilities, which helps in organizing components effectively. Ansys LS-DYNA, with a score of 7.9 for component libraries, may not offer the same level of organization, potentially leading to inefficiencies in accessing design elements.
- Reviewers mention that SOLIDWORKS shines in its ease of use, with a score of 8.6, making it accessible for new users. In contrast, Ansys LS-DYNA's ease of use score of 7.5 indicates a steeper learning curve, which could be a drawback for teams looking for quick onboarding.
- Users say that SOLIDWORKS provides robust support with a quality rating of 8.1, ensuring users can get help when needed. Ansys LS-DYNA matches this support quality but lacks the same volume of user reviews, which may indicate less community engagement or fewer resources available for troubleshooting.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Ansys LS-DYNA
No pricing availableSOLIDWORKS
No pricing availableFree Trial
Ansys LS-DYNA
No trial information availableSOLIDWORKS
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
31
8.8
517
Ease of Use
7.6
32
8.6
521
Ease of Setup
7.7
5
8.2
93
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.9
46
Quality of Support
8.2
30
8.1
457
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.3
46
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
28
8.6
512
Features by Category
CAD to CAM
Not enough data
9.1
41
Not enough data
8.8
41
Not enough data
8.9
41
CNC Programming
Not enough data
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.4
36
Machining
Not enough data
8.6
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Design
Not enough data
9.5
100
Not enough data
9.4
100
Not enough data
9.3
96
Not enough data
8.1
96
Edit
Not enough data
8.5
94
Not enough data
8.3
87
Not enough data
9.3
95
Not enough data
8.3
82
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.6
91
Not enough data
9.0
93
Not enough data
8.4
87
Library
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.6
22
CAD
Not enough data
8.9
23
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.0
28
Integration
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
9.6
27
Not enough data
8.5
23
Data
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.2
24
Not enough data
8.9
24
Not enough data
8.1
22
Not enough data
8.6
23
Logistics
Not enough data
9.1
25
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
8.8
60
Not enough data
8.6
46
Not enough data
8.4
51
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.6
54
Not enough data
8.6
58
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.6
48
Not enough data
8.8
57
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.7
47
Not enough data
8.6
52
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
6.1
19
Not enough data
6.1
19
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Options
Not enough data
8.8
43
Not enough data
9.1
42
Not enough data
9.0
41
Not enough data
9.3
43
Not enough data
8.3
34
Not enough data
8.2
40
Tools
Not enough data
9.4
42
Not enough data
9.0
40
Not enough data
9.2
42
Design
Not enough data
9.4
42
Design
Not enough data
7.7
11
Not enough data
7.7
11
Tools
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Library
Not enough data
8.1
12
Platform
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
7.9
11
Customization
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Design
6.6
17
9.2
59
7.1
16
9.0
60
7.6
17
8.8
60
7.4
15
7.6
58
Tools
8.3
13
8.0
53
9.0
21
7.9
55
8.2
17
7.4
48
Work
7.7
16
7.5
40
8.4
15
7.8
41
8.1
16
8.3
49
8.0
11
8.1
43
8.3
12
8.4
46
Environment
8.7
10
8.3
52
8.5
11
8.4
50
8.7
9
8.2
48
8.0
14
8.6
52
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
9.3
25
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
9.3
25
Not enough data
9.0
24
Not enough data
7.6
24
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.1
25
Not enough data
8.2
23
Not enough data
7.6
26
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
7.5
22
Not enough data
8.2
22
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
7.8
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Ansys LS-DYNA and SOLIDWORKS are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Ansys LS-DYNA has no unique categories
SOLIDWORKS is categorized as Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD), General-Purpose CAD, CAD Viewers, Sketching, PCB Design, Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM), CAD Libraries, CAD Data Exchange, and Additive Manufacturing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Ansys LS-DYNA
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SOLIDWORKS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Automotive
31.0%
Higher Education
11.9%
Research
7.1%
Defense & Space
7.1%
Aviation & Aerospace
7.1%
Other
35.7%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
22.8%
Design
12.1%
Automotive
6.6%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
6.0%
Medical Devices
5.8%
Other
46.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Ansys LS-DYNA has no discussions with answers
What is SOLIDWORKS used for?
3 Comments
YP
SOLIDWORKS IS USED FOR MULTIPLE WORK LIKE 2D & 3D CAD MODELING, ASSEMBLY MODELING, SHWWET METAL MODELING, SURFACE MODELING, RENDERING, SIMULATION, 3D...Read more
best use o this software
2 Comments
OS
Making 2D sketches and extruding them to make 3d sketches.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
