Best Load Testing Tools

How Many Load Testing Tools Products Does G2 Track?

Total Products under this Category: 66

Category Stats (Sep 2026)

  • Average Rating: 4.41/5 (↑0.03 vs Aug 2026) The average rating of products in this category, based on all submitted ratings
  • Top Trending Product: Gatling (+0.43%) - Among all products in this category, Gatling recorded the largest rating increase compared to last month

Last updated: September 05, 2026

How Does G2 Rank Load Testing Tools Products?

Why You Can Trust G2's Software Rankings:

  • 30 Analysts and Data Experts
  • 4,600+ Authentic Reviews
  • 66+ Products
  • Unbiased Rankings

G2's software rankings are built on verified user reviews, rigorous moderation, and a consistent research methodology maintained by a team of analysts and data experts. Each product is measured using the same transparent criteria, with no paid placement or vendor influence. While reviews reflect real user experiences, which can be subjective, they offer valuable insight into how software performs in the hands of professionals. Together, these inputs power the G2 Score, a standardized way to compare tools within every category.

G2 Grid® for Load Testing Tools

G2 Grid® for Load Testing Tools plotting products by satisfaction and market presence

Highlighted products: BrowserStack, BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform, Gatling, Keysight Eggplant, Qodex.ai, OpenText Core Performance Engineering, Akamai CloudTest, and SOAPUI.

Underlying data: [Grid® JSON](https://www.g2.com/categories/load-testing-tools/grids.json?focus%5B%5D=browserstack&focus%5B%5D=blazemeter-continuous-testing-platform&focus%5B%5D=gatling&focus%5B%5D=keysight-eggplant&focus%5B%5D=qodex-ai&focus%5B%5D=opentext-core-performance-engineering&focus%5B%5D=akamai-cloudtest&focus%5B%5D=soapui)

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the world’s leading cloud-based testing platform, trusted by 50,000+ Dev and QA teams to deliver fast, reliable, and high-quality software. From manual to automated, visual to accessibility testing, BrowserStack brings every layer of the QA process onto a single, integrated platform, so you can ship confidently at scale. Our Products: Manual Testing Live: Cross-browser testing App Live: Real device testing Testing Toolkit: Essential manual testing tools Test Automation Automate: Browser automation cloud App Automate: Mobile app automation cloud Percy: Visual testing & review App Percy: Visual testing & review Management & Optimization Test Management: Plan, track, and manage tests Test Management for Jira: Manage tests inside Jira Test Reporting & Analytics: Monitor & optimize all tests Automation without coding Low Code Automation: AI-driven automated tests Website Scanner: All-in-one website checker

Average Rating: 4.4/5.0

Total Reviews: 3,321

How Do G2 Users Rate BrowserStack?

  • Extreme Cases: 7.7/10 (Category avg: 8.3/10)
  • Stress Testing: 7.8/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.8/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
  • Test Variety: 8.5/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)

Who Is the Company Behind BrowserStack?

  • Seller: BrowserStack
  • Company Website:
  • Year Founded: 2011
  • HQ Location: Dublin, Dublin
  • Twitter: @browserstack
    11,547 Twitter followers
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    1,797 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Who Uses This: Software Engineer, QA Engineer
  • Top Industries: Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 40% Small, 38% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About BrowserStack?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users find BrowserStack's interface easy to use, facilitating seamless access to real device testing across multiple platforms.
  • Users value the real device testing feature of BrowserStack, enhancing compatibility across diverse platforms without physical hardware.
  • Users value the wide coverage of real devices on BrowserStack, ensuring comprehensive product testing across different environments.
  • Users appreciate the extensive device and browser combinations in BrowserStack, significantly enhancing testing efficiency and compatibility.
  • Users find BrowserStack's easy testing capabilities invaluable for efficient cross-platform and UI-specific testing.
Cons
  • Users often experience slow performance with BrowserStack, impacting testing efficiency and reliability of results.
  • Users experience slow loading times with BrowserStack, leading to frustrating delays during tests and setup.
  • Users feel that the pricing of BrowserStack is expensive and suggest more affordable package options.
  • Users often face slow speed during peak hours, impacting performance and complicating debugging efforts.
  • Users report testing difficulties due to inconsistencies and lag, making reliable results hard to achieve.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of BrowserStack?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About BrowserStack?

Gatling

Gatling is a load-testing solution that helps organizations identify bottlenecks and guarantee website stability under traffic load through test automation. Gatling Enterprise includes advanced features for reporting (live reporting, TCP connections metrics, bandwidth usage, injectors' monitoring) and automation (public APIs, new Continuous Integration plugins, clustering mode). With 30,000,000 downloads for more than 300 000 companies worldwide, Gatling’s solution is used in diverse industries such as software, e-commerce, streaming media, banking, insurance, gaming, and finance.

Average Rating: 4.4/5.0

Total Reviews: 113

How Do G2 Users Rate Gatling?

  • Extreme Cases: 8.0/10 (Category avg: 8.3/10)
  • Stress Testing: 9.3/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.1/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
  • Test Variety: 8.4/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Gatling?

  • Seller: Gatling
  • Company Website:
  • HQ Location: Paris, France
  • Twitter: @GatlingTool
    2,941 Twitter followers
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    45 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Who Uses This: Software Engineer
  • Top Industries: Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 38% Medium, 34% Small

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Gatling?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users appreciate the automation capabilities of Gatling, facilitating seamless integration with CI/CD workflows for efficiency.
  • Users appreciate the ease of use in Gatling, enhancing load testing automation within their CI/CD workflows.
  • Users appreciate the excellent customer support of Gatling, enhancing their experience and facilitating smoother testing processes.
  • Users highlight the excellent customer support from Gatling, enhancing their overall testing experience and satisfaction.
  • Users appreciate the easy setup of Gatling, enabling seamless integration with CI/CD tools for efficient performance testing.
Cons
  • Users find the complex configuration of Gatling challenging, particularly non-developers lacking programming experience.
  • Users find insufficient documentation and confusing information which may hinder effective use of Gatling.
  • Users note that the poor documentation can lead to confusion and hinder effective use of Gatling's features.
  • Users struggle with Gatling’s poor UI, finding it difficult to navigate, especially those without programming skills.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Gatling?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About Gatling?

BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform

BlazeMeter, a comprehensive continuous testing platform that boosts your software delivery speed and quality, specializes in performance testing, functional UI testing, API testing and monitoring, along with AI-driven test data generation and service virtualization. It enables swift and scalable simulations of user activity, ensuring robust performance and seamless functionality across applications. Integrating with CI/CD pipelines for both development and operations, BlazeMeter provides detailed, real-time analytics to optimize performance and meet stringent SLAs. Its service virtualization capabilities allow for uninterrupted testing and agile delivery, establishing it as the ideal solution for high-velocity software development teams focused on delivering superior user experiences. Learn more at blazemeter.com.

Average Rating: 4.0/5.0

Total Reviews: 24

How Do G2 Users Rate BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform?

  • Extreme Cases: 8.5/10 (Category avg: 8.3/10)
  • Stress Testing: 8.5/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.3/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
  • Test Variety: 8.3/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)

Who Is the Company Behind BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform?

  • Seller: Perforce
  • Year Founded: 1995
  • HQ Location: Minneapolis, MN
  • Twitter: @perforce
    5,090 Twitter followers
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    2,009 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Information Technology and Services, Computer Software
  • Company Size: 52% Medium, 36% Large

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users appreciate the ease of use of BlazeMeter, enabling smooth collaboration across QA, developers, and DevOps teams.
  • Users appreciate the efficiency and functionality of BlazeMeter, which streamlines the testing process for various teams.
  • Users commend BlazeMeter for its excellent performance testing capabilities, enhancing efficiency and automation across teams.
  • Users value the team collaboration features of BlazeMeter, facilitating seamless automation and testing across various teams.
  • Users find BlazeMeter's efficiency and ease of use invaluable for streamlining and automating the testing process.
Cons
  • Users find BlazeMeter to be expensive for its offerings, seeking better pricing options and package plans.
  • Users find the complex integration with CI/CD tools time-consuming and often require extensive troubleshooting.
  • Users find the data limitations of BlazeMeter, particularly with non-ASCII files, somewhat frustrating despite its ease of use.
  • Users find the inaccuracy with non-ASCII character files to be a significant drawback despite its ease of use.
  • Users experience complex integration issues with BlazeMeter, leading to time-consuming troubleshooting with existing CI/CD tools.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform?

Qodex.ai

Qodex is a continuous testing platform that runs your test scenarios against your real app on every pull request and deploy, then shows you exactly what broke with the failing request, response, and screenshot.

Average Rating: 4.9/5.0

Total Reviews: 60

How Do G2 Users Rate Qodex.ai?

  • Extreme Cases: 9.4/10 (Category avg: 8.3/10)
  • Stress Testing: 9.2/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.4/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
  • Test Variety: 9.7/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Qodex.ai?

  • Seller: QodexAI
  • Company Website:
  • Year Founded: 2023
  • HQ Location: San Francisco, California
  • LinkedIn® Page: linkedin.com
    13 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 75% Small, 20% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Qodex.ai?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users highlight the ease of use of Qodex.ai, enabling quick learning and efficient API testing for all skill levels.
  • Users appreciate the automation of testing in Qodex.ai, greatly reducing testing time and enhancing reliability.
  • Users value the easy interface for writing test cases, streamlining the testing process and enhancing efficiency.
  • Users appreciate the testing efficiency of Qodex.ai, streamlining the testing process and reducing shipment time significantly.
  • Users appreciate the effortless automation of Qodex.ai, which streamlines API testing and enhances team productivity.
Cons
  • Users note that the slow loading of the UI can hinder their experience and requires improvement.
  • Users find the poor documentation hampers their ability to fully utilize Qodex.ai's advanced features effectively.
  • Users report slow performance with Qodex.ai, noting delays in UI loading and chatbot response times.
  • Users report bug issues including repeated test cases, and suggest improvements in bug classification and accuracy.
  • Users report bugs related to test cases and suggest improvements for prioritizing and flagging issues effectively.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Qodex.ai?

Keysight Eggplant

Keysight Eggplant is a leading intelligent test automation platform that uses ML/AI to test the entire user journey — identifying and predicting any potential defects along the way. Unlike other testing tools, Eggplant can test any technology, platform, or device, no matter the complexity. Because Eggplant is non-invasive, it does not require access to source code, making it the best solution for black box testing in secure environments. Eggplant delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any software on any platform or device.

Average Rating: 4.2/5.0

Total Reviews: 87

How Do G2 Users Rate Keysight Eggplant?

  • Extreme Cases: 8.5/10 (Category avg: 8.3/10)
  • Stress Testing: 9.0/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.8/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
  • Test Variety: 8.8/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Keysight Eggplant?

  • Seller: Keysight Technologies
  • Year Founded: 2014
  • HQ Location: Santa Rosa, California, United States
  • Twitter: @Keysight
    13,585 Twitter followers
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    13,542 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Ownership: NYSE: KEYS

Who Uses This Product?

  • Who Uses This: Software Engineer, Test Automation Engineer
  • Top Industries: Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 44% Large, 35% Small

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Keysight Eggplant?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users find Eggplant's ease of use remarkable, with a low learning curve and intuitive interface enhancing automation efforts.
  • Users value the ease of automation with Eggplant, appreciating its user-friendly interface and quick implementation.
  • Users value the ease of use in automation support of Keysight Eggplant, facilitating quick and effective test implementation.
  • Users find automation easy with Keysight Eggplant, appreciating its quick setup and low learning curve for scripting.
  • Users value the outstanding customer support from Keysight Eggplant, enhancing the overall user experience significantly.
Cons
  • Users face challenges with browser compatibility, which can hinder testing effectiveness across various platforms.
  • Users face compatibility challenges with various technologies and applications, impacting the effectiveness of Eggplant Functional.
  • Users face recurring OCR issues in Keysight Eggplant, leading to frequent test case failures during complex scenarios.
  • Users often face significant compatibility challenges with various technologies and specific applications when using Keysight Eggplant.
  • Users find the complexity of Keysight Eggplant challenging, particularly in managing logs and file conversions effectively.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Keysight Eggplant?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About Keysight Eggplant?

OpenText Core Performance Engineering

Simple, smart, and scalable cloud-based load and performance testing for web and mobile apps.

Average Rating: 4.7/5.0

Total Reviews: 13

How Do G2 Users Rate OpenText Core Performance Engineering?

  • Extreme Cases: 9.4/10 (Category avg: 8.3/10)
  • Stress Testing: 9.3/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.6/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
  • Test Variety: 9.4/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)

Who Is the Company Behind OpenText Core Performance Engineering?

  • Seller: OpenText
  • Year Founded: 1991
  • HQ Location: Waterloo, ON
  • Twitter: @OpenText
    21,565 Twitter followers
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    22,835 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Ownership: NASDAQ:OTEX

Who Uses This Product?

  • Company Size: 54% Large, 23% Medium

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of OpenText Core Performance Engineering?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About OpenText Core Performance Engineering?

Akamai CloudTest

CloudTest provides a comprehensive performance platform for quickly validating and optimizing web and mobile user experience.

Average Rating: 4.6/5.0

Total Reviews: 19

How Do G2 Users Rate Akamai CloudTest?

  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.8/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Akamai CloudTest?

  • Seller: Akamai Technologies
  • Year Founded: 1998
  • HQ Location: Cambridge, MA
  • Twitter: @Akamai
    115,251 Twitter followers
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    10,658 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Ownership: NASDAQ:AKAM

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 37% Small, 32% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Akamai CloudTest?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users find Akamai CloudTest to be exceptionally easy to use, enhancing efficiency in mobile app testing and validation.
  • Users appreciate the optimal performance testing of Akamai CloudTest, ensuring their apps excel in real-world scenarios.
  • Users value the cloud compatibility of Akamai CloudTest, allowing for flexible, anywhere access to testing tools.
  • Users value the comprehensive mobile testing tools of Akamai CloudTest for ensuring optimal app performance in real-world scenarios.
  • Users highlight the performance optimization capabilities of Akamai CloudTest, ensuring apps perform well in real-world scenarios.
Cons
  • Users find the limited customization options restrictive, impacting the ability to execute complex testing scenarios effectively.
  • Users find Akamai CloudTest expensive and challenging for small organizations due to high costs and limited customization options.
  • Users find the limited features of Akamai CloudTest a drawback, restricting their testing capabilities and flexibility.
  • Users find the documentation lacking, emphasizing the need for clearer and more user-friendly resources.
  • Users find the configuration issues with XML setups limit flexibility, despite Akamai CloudTest being helpful for real-time load runs.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Akamai CloudTest?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About Akamai CloudTest?

SOAPUI

SoapUI is the world's most trusted open source API testing tool

Average Rating: 4.4/5.0

Total Reviews: 136

How Do G2 Users Rate SOAPUI?

  • Extreme Cases: 7.9/10 (Category avg: 8.3/10)
  • Stress Testing: 8.6/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.0/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
  • Test Variety: 8.5/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)

Who Is the Company Behind SOAPUI?

  • Seller: SmartBear
  • HQ Location: Somerville, MA
  • Twitter: @smartbear
    16,468 Twitter followers
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    944 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Who Uses This: Software Engineer, Consultant
  • Top Industries: Information Technology and Services, Computer Software
  • Company Size: 45% Medium, 44% Large

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About SOAPUI?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users value the easy learning curve and quick support for effective API testing with SoapUI.
  • Users appreciate the quick help and strong community support for API testing with SoapUI.
  • Users find SoapUI's ease of use invaluable for quick, effective API testing and project management.
  • Users value the robust capabilities of SOAPUI for comprehensive API and load testing, enhancing their testing efficiency.
  • Users find SOAPUI to have a simple UI, making it easy to learn and access support for API testing.
Cons
  • Users find the complex UI of SOAPUI challenging, often slowing down project setup and feature navigation.
  • Users find the difficult navigation in SOAPUI frustrating, as it complicates setting up new projects and accessing features.
  • Users find the difficult setup process and complex UI to be a significant hurdle when starting new projects.
  • Users find the costly pro version essential for team collaboration, adding financial burden to project management.
  • Users find functionality issues in SOAPUI, noting a need for improved automation and a competitive edge over other tools.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of SOAPUI?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About SOAPUI?

LoadView

LoadView is a fully managed, cloud-based load and performance testing platform that helps DevOps teams, QA professionals, and performance engineers ensure their websites, web applications, APIs, and streaming media can handle real-world traffic without slowing down or crashing. By simulating from a handful to hundreds of thousands of concurrent users, it reveals exactly how your systems behave under pressure—so you can fix bottlenecks before customers notice. What sets LoadView apart is that it runs tests in real browsers, not just simple HTTP requests. While many tools only measure raw server response times, LoadView reproduces the complete user experience—loading pages, executing JavaScript, rendering dynamic content, and interacting with your application exactly as a genuine visitor would. This produces performance data reflecting what users actually feel—accurate, actionable results. Building realistic test scenarios is fast and code-free thanks to the EveryStep Web Recorder. Simply click through your site or application—log in, search, add to cart, check out—and EveryStep captures every action into a reusable script you can replay across more than 40 desktop and mobile browser and device combinations, without writing a single line of code. For teams with existing assets, LoadView natively supports Postman Collections, JMeter scripts, and Selenium scripts, so you can reuse prior work and scale it into full load tests instantly. LoadView gives you precise control over how load is applied through flexible load curve options. The Load Step Curve ramps users up and down in defined increments to observe behavior at each level. The Goal-Based Curve targets a specific number of concurrent sessions—ideal for validating against a known traffic goal. The Dynamic Adjustable Curve lets you change load on the fly during a live test. With unlimited parallel testing, you can model everything from a gradual build to a sudden spike from a launch, flash sale, or viral moment. Running on a global cloud network, LoadView generates load from numerous geographic locations worldwide via leading providers like AWS and Azure, measuring performance the way real users in each region experience it. The infrastructure is fully managed—no servers to provision, no load generators to configure, and no hardware to maintain. For applications that aren't publicly accessible, the on-premise agent and behind-the-firewall testing options let you safely load test internal sites and pre-production environments without exposing them to the open internet. After each test, LoadView delivers detailed, easy-to-read performance reports with metrics like average response time, sessions per second, error rates, and waterfall charts that break down every element on a page. Performance data is correlated against your user load, so you can pinpoint the exact moment and component where problems begin—key insight for capacity planning, SLA validation, and continuous improvement. LoadView also integrates with CI/CD pipelines, letting you automate performance testing as part of your release process. LoadView serves organizations of every size, from startups to large enterprises across ecommerce, financial services, healthcare, government, education, and media. Common use cases include preparing for high-traffic events, validating launches, stress-testing APIs and chat apps, and ensuring platforms like Salesforce hold up under load. Pricing is flexible and transparent. A zero-commitment, pay-as-you-go on-demand plan is perfect for occasional tests, while monthly and annual subscriptions suit teams with ongoing needs and include rollover of unused resources. Custom enterprise plans add dedicated performance engineering, SSO, and advanced account management. Every new account starts with free tests and no contract.

Average Rating: 4.5/5.0

Total Reviews: 114

How Do G2 Users Rate LoadView?

  • Extreme Cases: 8.7/10 (Category avg: 8.3/10)
  • Stress Testing: 9.1/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.9/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
  • Test Variety: 9.0/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)

Who Is the Company Behind LoadView?

  • Seller: Dotcom-Monitor LoadView
  • Year Founded: 1998
  • HQ Location: Spring Park, MN
  • Twitter: @Dotcom_Monitor
    1,556 Twitter followers
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    25 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Ownership: Dotcom-Monitor

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 62% Small, 26% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About LoadView?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users value the excellent customer support of LoadView, praising their quick responses and helpful assistance.
  • Users find LoadView's ease of implementation beneficial, making it simple to track project loads efficiently.
  • Users value the ease of use of LoadView, complemented by exceptional customer support and quick response times.
  • Users find the easy setup of LoadView time-saving and efficient for tracking project loads and scripts.
  • Users value the ease of implementation of LoadView, which simplifies daily load tracking for various projects.
Cons
  • Users find LoadView to be expensive for long-term use, though it performs well during peak needs.
  • Users feel there are testing limitations with LoadView, including a lack of clear metrics and details.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of LoadView?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About LoadView?

OpenText Silk Performer

Micro Focus Silk Performer (formerly Borland Silk Performer) is designed to deliver a consistent user experience anytime, anywhere, and on any device.

Average Rating: 4.3/5.0

Total Reviews: 23

How Do G2 Users Rate OpenText Silk Performer?

  • Extreme Cases: 9.4/10 (Category avg: 8.3/10)
  • Stress Testing: 10.0/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.5/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
  • Test Variety: 10.0/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)

Who Is the Company Behind OpenText Silk Performer?

  • Seller: OpenText
  • Year Founded: 1991
  • HQ Location: Waterloo, ON
  • Twitter: @OpenText
    21,565 Twitter followers
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    22,835 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Ownership: NASDAQ:OTEX

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Information Technology and Services, Banking
  • Company Size: 54% Large, 36% Medium

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of OpenText Silk Performer?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About OpenText Silk Performer?

Tricentis Neoload

"Tricentis NeoLoad is a performance testing solution designed to help engineering teams validate the performance, scalability, and reliability of web applications, APIs, and microservices under realistic load conditions. It is a type of load and performance testing platform that helps QA engineers, developers, and performance specialists simulate large numbers of virtual users and measure application behavior under stress, peak load, and endurance scenarios. NeoLoad combines protocol-based and browser-based test generation to support a wide range of application architectures, from legacy monolithic systems to modern microservices and cloud-native applications. Teams can design tests using a codeless interface, as-code (YAML), or scripted approaches, making the platform accessible to both technical and non-technical testers. The platform integrates with CI/CD pipelines to enable continuous performance testing as part of the software delivery workflow, and can convert existing Tricentis Tosca and Selenium functional test scripts into performance tests to accelerate test design and maintenance. Key capabilities include: - AI-powered agentic performance testing with a built-in AI chat interface and Model Context Protocol (MCP) support for natural-language, cross-tool workflows - RealBrowser technology for browser-based load simulation that reflects real user experience, using roughly 30% less memory and CPU than legacy browser-based tools - Performance testing as code with full CLI support for pipeline integration - Dynamic infrastructure provisioning across 70+ on-demand cloud locations from seven providers, with native support for Kubernetes, OpenShift, and other container orchestrators - Comprehensive SAP coverage including GUI, Fiori, RFC, and IDoc protocols - Support for legacy systems through Remote Terminal Emulation - Network virtualization that simulates real-world bandwidth, latency, and packet loss across 3G, 4G, and WiFi conditions - Automatic test script updates when applications change NeoLoad is particularly well suited for enterprises undergoing digital transformation, organizations with complex SAP landscapes, and DevOps teams looking to shift performance testing earlier in the development cycle. Results and analytics are surfaced through detailed dashboards and reports, giving teams actionable insight into bottlenecks, response times, error rates, and infrastructure resource consumption. NeoLoad also integrates with APM platforms such as Dynatrace, AppDynamics, New Relic, and Datadog, version control systems including Git and SVN, and open-source load testing tools like JMeter and Gatling for consolidated analysis."

Average Rating: 4.3/5.0

Total Reviews: 32

How Do G2 Users Rate Tricentis Neoload?

  • Extreme Cases: 8.5/10 (Category avg: 8.3/10)
  • Stress Testing: 9.1/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 10.0/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
  • Test Variety: 8.9/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Tricentis Neoload?

  • Seller: Tricentis
  • Year Founded: 2007
  • HQ Location: Austin, Texas
  • Twitter: @Tricentis
    12,931 Twitter followers
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    1,679 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 38% Small, 34% Large

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Tricentis Neoload?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users value the ease of use of Tricentis NeoLoad, appreciating its intuitive design and automation-friendly features.
  • Users appreciate the testing capabilities of Tricentis Neoload, noting its intuitive interface and clear, detailed reports.
  • Users appreciate the intuitive user interface of Tricentis NeoLoad, making performance testing seamless and efficient.
  • Users appreciate the intuitive interface and clear results of Tricentis Neoload, simplifying performance testing significantly.
  • Users appreciate the seamless integrations of Tricentis NeoLoad, enhancing efficiency within existing workflows and tools.
Cons
  • Users often find the steep learning curve of Tricentis NeoLoad challenging, impacting their overall experience and efficiency.
  • Users face a steep learning curve with NeoLoad, complicating initial setup and increasing time for task completion.
  • Users note that Tricentis Neoload is expensive, presenting challenges for smaller teams compared to alternatives.
  • Users find the steep learning curve of NeoLoad challenging, especially for advanced features and complex scenarios.
  • Users find the high licensing cost of Tricentis Neoload challenging, especially for smaller teams and budgets.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Tricentis Neoload?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About Tricentis Neoload?

Loader.io

Loader.io is a FREE load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps & apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

Average Rating: 4.2/5.0

Total Reviews: 12

How Do G2 Users Rate Loader.io?

  • Extreme Cases: 7.8/10 (Category avg: 8.3/10)
  • Stress Testing: 9.2/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.4/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
  • Test Variety: 8.3/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Loader.io?

  • Seller: Twilio
  • Year Founded: 2008
  • HQ Location: San Francisco, CA
  • Twitter: @twilio
    81,644 Twitter followers
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    7,801 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Ownership: NYSE: TWLO

Who Uses This Product?

  • Company Size: 42% Small, 42% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Loader.io?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users find Loader.io remarkably easy to use, allowing quick configuration and efficient stress testing with minimal effort.
  • Users praise the easy setup of Loader.io, enabling quick stress testing and efficient results within minutes.
  • Users commend Loader.io for its easy test configuration and fast results, significantly simplifying load testing processes.
  • Users appreciate the ease of configuration for stress tests with Loader.io, enabling quick and efficient results.
  • Users appreciate the automation capabilities of Loader.io, allowing focus on setup rather than continuous monitoring.
Cons
  • Users note the dated and flaky UI of Loader.io, expressing a desire for significant improvements to user experience.
  • Users find the poor UI of Loader.io outdated and lacking essential features like a progress bar.
  • Users find the dated user interface of Loader.io lacking and suggest it needs an overhaul for better experience.
  • Users find the testing limitations of Loader.io frustrating, particularly the lack of a progress bar and fuzzy testing options.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Loader.io?

PFLB

PFLB is an AI-powered load testing platform designed to help teams confidently scale their websites and applications. With PFLB, you can effortlessly simulate massive traffic, replicating real-world conditions to ensure your product's performance under peak load. Key Features: -Automatic Test Plan Generation: Create precise load profiles based on production user data by linking your Google Analytics account. -Realistic Testing: Leverage scenario-based traffic simulations that mirror real-world usage, including high geo-distributed loads. -Advanced No-Code Scripting: Harness the power of our intuitive no-code editor to create and customize advanced test scripts. -JMeter in the cloud: Import JMeter JMX files and execute them from the cloud. -AI-Powered Performance Insights: Automatically identify performance bottlenecks with AI-driven analytics. -Powerful Reporting: Discover load testing results in real-time Grafana dashboards. Compare different test runs in the comprehensive Trend Report. -Continuous Testing: Integrate PFLB load testing with your CI/CD pipeline Supported Protocols: HTTP, HTTPS, gRPC, JDBC, JMS, AMQP, MQTT, Kafka. For more information, visit our website at pflb.us.

Average Rating: 4.8/5.0

Total Reviews: 39

How Do G2 Users Rate PFLB?

  • Extreme Cases: 8.9/10 (Category avg: 8.3/10)
  • Stress Testing: 9.2/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.6/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
  • Test Variety: 9.3/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)

Who Is the Company Behind PFLB?

  • Seller: PFLB
  • Year Founded: 2022
  • HQ Location: Mountain View, US
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    13 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Computer Software
  • Company Size: 70% Small, 20% Large

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About PFLB?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users highlight the efficiency of automation in PFLB, making load testing easy, especially for beginners.
  • Users praise the ease of use of PFLB, particularly its no code script builder for effortless load testing.
  • Users appreciate the intuitive and powerful performance testing capabilities of PFLB, enabling effective load management with ease.
  • Users love the time-saving features of PFLB, enabling efficient load testing without extensive coding skills.
  • Users value the supportive environment and teamwork at PFLB, enhancing their learning and collaboration experience.
Cons
  • Users find the expensive pricing of PFLB a drawback, especially for smaller teams or startups.
  • Users find the pricing structure confusing and unfavorable for small businesses and startups, limiting accessibility.
  • Users find the initial learning curve challenging, making mastery of PFLB's advanced features and pricing difficult.
  • Users find PFLB to be complex and daunting, especially during setup and learning the advanced features.
  • Users find the pricing structure confusing and high, particularly challenging for startups to manage effectively.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of PFLB?

Froth TestOps

Froth TestOps unifies manual and automated testing with seamless monitoring, multi-source results, CI integration, rapid issue reporting, and AI-assisted requirements, test case management, and scheduling—enhancing transparency, team effectiveness, and overall software testing lifecycle performance as a top test management tools.

Average Rating: 4.4/5.0

Total Reviews: 23

How Do G2 Users Rate Froth TestOps?

  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.6/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Froth TestOps?

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Telecommunications, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 61% Medium, 39% Small

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Froth TestOps?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users value the AI-powered test case generation in Froth TestOps, enhancing development effectiveness and clarity.
  • Users appreciate the effortless automation capabilities of Froth TestOps, enhancing efficiency in testing processes and reporting.
  • Users value the customizable and user-friendly dashboards of Froth TestOps, enhancing organization and efficiency in testing processes.
  • Users find Froth TestOps to be user-friendly and straightforward, enhancing their QA workflow and automation experience.
  • Users appreciate the organized test management of Froth TestOps, enhancing efficiency and clarity in the testing process.
Cons
  • Users express concerns about poor reporting, citing slow load times and a lack of customization in the reports.
  • Users often face slow loading times with Froth TestOps, hindering quick access to necessary tests and reports.
  • Users experience slow performance with Froth TestOps, particularly when handling numerous test cases and complex UI interactions.
  • Users experience testing difficulties with performance issues and slowness when handling numerous test cases in Froth TestOps.
  • Users experience delayed email notifications for approvals with Froth TestOps, which can hinder timely responses.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Froth TestOps?

k6

k6 is an open-source tool and cloud service that makes load testing easy for developers, operations, and QA engineers. We help software teams improve the testing process so that they consistently deliver fast and reliable applications. k6 is a Grafana Labs Company.

Average Rating: 4.8/5.0

Total Reviews: 31

How Do G2 Users Rate k6?

  • Extreme Cases: 9.2/10 (Category avg: 8.3/10)
  • Stress Testing: 9.5/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.3/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
  • Test Variety: 8.6/10 (Category avg: 8.7/10)

Who Is the Company Behind k6?

  • Seller: k6
  • Year Founded: 2009
  • HQ Location: Stockholm
  • Twitter: @schuran
    268 Twitter followers
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    51 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 65% Medium, 26% Large

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of k6?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About k6?

Adam Crivello
AC
Researched and written by Adam Crivello
Updated October 3, 2024