I found LoadView really helpful for identifying the weak points on my website and for providing valuable insights. What I liked most was the detailed load analysis, especially the real-time data capture, which was the main feature that attracted me. It was also easy to set up and quick to get started. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

LoadView felt very expensive, which isn’t ideal for a young startup in India. I’d like to see more dynamic pricing that’s better suited to the Indian market. Another issue for me is the response time: as a new user, I’d rather see detailed results as the test runs, instead of waiting for a complete AI summary at the end. Because of this, I ended up looking at alternatives, like deploying agents with Claude for load testing, which is much cheaper than LoadView. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

LoadView was a very useful tool for bridging the gap between traditional load testing and end-to-end performance testing. I had previously been using tools like k6 to test APIs and individual endpoints, but what I really wanted to validate was whether our complete checkout flow could handle the maximum number of concurrent users we expected in production. That flow included server-side and client-side requests, local rendering, UI elements appearing at the right time, and users progressing through multiple steps. With LoadView, I could record the actual user journey and run it with different numbers of virtual users, ramping traffic up and down and simulating realistic peaks. The reports helped us identify a few issues before launch, we made the necessary corrections, and the results gave us more confidence that the system was ready for production. We launched successfully, and LoadView was a helpful part of that process.

The customer support was also very good. They responded quickly and took the time to understand my specific use case. A special thanks to Max, who helped me get more value from the tool, including a call where he walked me through the platform and shared some useful timing measurement techniques that saved me time. That kind of practical guidance was helpful and made the onboarding process easier. Overall, LoadView worked well for our end-to-end load testing needs, was straightforward to configure, and came with responsive support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UX of the recording process could be better. Sometimes, if you didn’t anchor the correct element or set up the text verification properly, you had to start the process over again. Also, the script isn’t easy to edit or understand. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find LoadView incredibly user-friendly and straightforward, which is great for someone who isn't super technical. It makes load testing feel way less like rocket science! Plus, their customer support is fantastic—they reach out proactively if there's an issue, which saves me a lot of time and effort. I also love how easy it is to simulate realistic user traffic without a ton of infrastructure or scripting, and how useful the reporting and performance insights are for quickly identifying bottlenecks. I really like the flexible load testing scenarios, real-time performance monitoring, and detailed reporting. The dashboard and test results make comparing performance super easy and help identify where improvements are needed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really liked LoadView, but when configuring more complex load tests, it could be improved. Some advanced scenarios require additional setup or technical knowledge. The interface could make those workflows more intuitive. I would also like more flexibility in customizing dashboards and reports, even though it already has those features. Plus, clearer guidance when troubleshooting failed or unexpected test results would be nice. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Very easy to navigate, even new QA also ready to do test Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Bit high the price, in market some open-source tools are there so please balance all Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The way that they care about the customers and always very concerned to solve each single issue that we have during our tests. It's a real-time customer support that help us to accomplish the time of our projects. All the support and care about us really the experience with Loadview excellent. The opportunity that we have as a trial license it's really very good and gave us opportunity to explore the product. I really do recommendation to test and use Loadview! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's not dislike, rather an improvement. The results and summary maybe could be better, actually the graphs only show 10 VMs for example, maybe you can improve that experience after the tests running. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This tool helps me in tracking the load on a daily basis for a project basis, and maintain the scripts accordingly, A good easy tool to implement Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing as of now everything is working fine Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

LoadView is pretty interesting because it offers real-time performance testing in a cloud-based environment. This means you can simulate user traffic and test how your application handles various loads, which is crucial for ensuring performance and reliability. The ability to customize test scenarios and analyze detailed performance metrics can help developers identify bottlenecks and optimize their systems more effectively. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While LoadView has many strengths, some users might find its complexity and learning curve a bit challenging, especially if they’re new to load testing. The interface and configuration options can be quite detailed, which might overwhelm beginners. Additionally, the cost could be a concern for smaller teams or projects, as comprehensive load testing tools often come with a significant price tag. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I tried a few load testing products, and some are cheaper (in some ways at least) but the on-boarding call is what sold me on doing a month to month. We do not need a annual at this time, but the monthly is for sure the best value (unless you only need one basic test) When we need monthly testing, yearly will be the best way to go, but we are smaller startup.. And load testing for us, could save us alot in AWS monthly fees. We already tried this to test the load on our AWS EC2 and RDS and it worked (even in trial mode, with just a few, we could see how it was pressing our system.. My goal is to press our servers to the max user limit and this will allow us to scale back our costly AWS servers. So, in the end, $200 a month, may save us 500-700 a month in AWS fees for server power we do not need. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Trying to learn how to do some things on my own, since I am non techical was tricky. But the onboarding call helped A LOT.. Being helped to set up the main test we need was important. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I noticed unique about LoadView compared to other load testing platforms is its user-friendly dashboard. It was pretty easy to go through the tutorial and run my first test for our website even with a trial account. And customer support was nice as I got a personal manager for my account and live chat support in the dashboard. Overall, I can give a 6/10 for this product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I noticed was the graphs, which were a little hard to understand and the design seemed old, and I couldn't find any documentation for the web API integration. It would be better if you guys provide documentation support in the primary dashboard itself or a link to the documentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ease of use and the support from the team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It was a little pricey for us to keep longterm, but worked fantastically when we needed it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.