A weekly snapshot of rising stars, new launches, and what everyone's buzzing about.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users find BrowserStack to be extremely user-friendly, enhancing their testing processes with seamless integrations and intuitive design.
Users appreciate the variety of real devices available on BrowserStack, enabling thorough manual and automation testing.
Users benefit from the extensive device variety offered by BrowserStack, simplifying cross-platform testing and reducing costs.
Users experience slow performance with BrowserStack, making testing challenging and affecting overall usability.
Users experience slow loading times with BrowserStack, complicating testing and prolonging execution of tests.
Users find BrowserStack to be expensive, particularly for small organizations and startups needing access to real devices.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users value the ease of use of Katalon Platform, enabling diverse QA members to collaboratively manage automated testing.
Users value the ease of automation with Katalon Platform, enabling diverse team contributions and skill growth.
Users value the automation support of Katalon Platform, making testing accessible for teams with diverse backgrounds.
Users find slow performance in Katalon Platform, particularly during long test runs and when opening the software.
Users find the Katalon Platform to be expensive, particularly for advanced features and resource requirements.
Users face system delays in Katalon Platform, affecting test execution and overall efficiency during automation tasks.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users commend the automation capabilities of Cyara Platform, enabling efficient CX testing and rapid issue identification.
Users commend the exceptional customer support from Cyara, enhancing their experience with proactive assistance and expertise.
Users appreciate the ease of use of Cyara Platform, finding its intuitive interface and functionality beneficial for testing.
Users find the initial complexity of Cyara overwhelming, especially with advanced test case authoring and configurations.
Users find the learning curve steep, making initial navigation challenging before realizing the platform's true value.
Users are frustrated with the shutdown of the mobile app, limiting accessibility and mobile support for the Cyara Platform.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate the ease of use of Keysight Eggplant, enjoying quick implementation and helpful vendor support.
Users value the automation capabilities of Keysight Eggplant, enhancing efficiency in repetitive testing tasks.
Users highlight the ease of use in automation support with Eggplant, making it accessible for all skill levels.
Users experience compatibility challenges with various technologies and applications, impacting the overall usability of Eggplant.
Users face compatibility challenges with specific technologies, hindering smooth operation and testing processes.
Users report encountering compatibility issues with Eggplant, affecting its integration with various technologies and applications.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users value the ease of use of Testsigma, enabling teams to collaborate effectively and automate testing effortlessly.
Users praise easy automation with Testsigma, enjoying its intuitive interface and responsive support for seamless testing.
Users commend Testsigma for its quick and responsive customer support, available via chat and email on weekdays.
Users face slow performance in Testsigma, particularly when adding NLPs and during scripting tasks.
Users face testing difficulties due to slow performance, limited documentation, and challenges in API testing.
Users report testing issues such as performance lag and challenges with API tests and end-to-end testing.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users find Leapwork to be easy to use, with an intuitive UI and exceptional onboarding experience.
Users highlight Leapwork's exceptional customer support, ensuring successful integration and responsive assistance throughout the automation journey.
Users commend the user-friendly automation of Leapwork, simplifying test case creation and enhancing business efficiency.
Users find Leapwork to be very expensive, raising concerns about cost-efficiency for scaling and implementation.
Users note significant cloud limitations, including difficulties with flow execution, reporting, and export options affecting usability.
Users express frustration with the limited customization options in Leapwork, hindering complex automation strategies and flexibility.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users find Applitools to have an excellent user interface and ease of use, greatly improving their testing efficiency.
Users commend Applitools for its efficient customer support, making UI testing seamless and time-saving.
Users value the comprehensive functionality of Applitools, which simplifies UI testing for both experienced and novice QA engineers.
Users find the complexity of Applitools challenging, particularly for non-technical staff trying to learn its features.
Users find Applitools expensive, particularly for large companies needing multiple accesses, making widespread adoption difficult.
Users find the difficult learning curve of Applitools to be challenging, hindering effective feature utilization and integration.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate the cross-browser and cross-device automation capabilities of Virtuoso QA, enhancing their testing efficiency and coverage.
Users value the ease of use in Virtuoso QA, benefiting from its low-code automation and swift execution capabilities.
Users appreciate the automation ease of Virtuoso QA, simplifying test creation with low code and AI features.
Users find the complexity of navigation in Virtuoso QA challenging, especially for those new to test automation.
Users find the difficult navigation in Virtuoso QA confusing, especially when managing multiple tasks simultaneously.
Users express concerns about the expensive pricing of Virtuoso QA, suggesting it can be reduced for better value.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users love Qualitia's scriptless automation, simplifying test creation and collaboration for both technical and non-technical users.
Users find the scriptless automation of Qualitia highly intuitive, simplifying the test creation process without coding knowledge.
Users highlight the exceptional customer support of Qualitia, ensuring quick resolutions and effective assistance in workflows.
Users report missing features in Qualitia, such as support for OOP concepts and limitations in environment execution.
Users report significant performance issues with Qualitia, causing slow execution and resource consumption that hampers productivity.
Users find the cost of Qualitia to be high, impacting accessibility and affordability for many teams.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users value automation efficiency in testRigor, freeing engineers to focus on new features and improving quality.
Users appreciate the ease of use of testRigor, enabling fast and efficient test automation for all team members.
Users commend TestRigor for its time-saving capabilities, enabling faster test automation and efficient engineering focus.
Users report frequent crashes in testRigor, leading to increased failures of test cases during use.
Users express concern about the expensive cost of servers, impacting the overall affordability of testRigor.
Users dislike the integration issues between parent and child suites, affecting the functionality of Reusable Rules.
This description is provided by the seller.