Recommendations to others considering SeeTest: Testing Platform for Web & Mobile Apps:
Figure out and evalue how much resources are spent on test INFRA support, and consider moving to SeeTest with existing automated test suites.
Those from QA world, who are participating in mobile test developing - at least to try SeeTest is a must! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What problems is SeeTest: Testing Platform for Web & Mobile Apps solving and how is that benefiting you?
I participated in a small startup dedicated to healthcare as Lead QA automation engineer.
We have a division of the whole system as: webUI admin , and mobile hybrid application.
So we're obligated to deliver minimal test coverage for admin UI part (for parallel browser execution) and
also we're supposed to deliver minimal tets coverage for mobile hybrid app.
Reporting in SeeTest makes debugging activities effortless.
Tests setup and CI pipeline - is straighforward and easy.
Summarizing - SeeTest helped to deliver in time expected automation scope.
And worth mentioning here- support of existing tests is great as well.
During active execution phases, especially after major application functionali changes -our selenium WebUI and mobile tests
have been executed very quickly and due to that- it indeed saved much time, also it helped our QA
automation team to debug and do corresponding tests adjustments and also SeeTest many times saved our lives
by early bug detection(as soon as we analyzed FAILED test reports). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.