Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare LabVIEW and Tango 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Knowby Pro
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Azumuta
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (44.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (57.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$493.00 Per Year
Free
LabVIEW
Star Rating
(192)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (44.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$493.00 Per Year
Browse all 3 pricing plansTango
Star Rating
(374)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (57.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansLabVIEW vs Tango
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Tango easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Tango overall.
- Reviewers felt that Tango meets the needs of their business better than LabVIEW.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Tango is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Tango over LabVIEW.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
LabVIEW
LabVIEW Base
$493.00
Per Year
- Recommended for desktop measurement applications
- Includes device drivers for NI hardware and third-party instruments
- Includes basic mathematics and signal processing
Tango
Free
Free
Create or join a tango Workspace with up to 10 colleagues, and create up to 15 process guides.
- 15 shared Workflows
- Browser process capture
- Basic exports and sharing
Free Trial
LabVIEW
Free Trial is available
Tango
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
146
9.3
360
Ease of Use
8.3
146
9.5
368
Ease of Setup
7.4
22
9.6
306
Ease of Admin
7.5
20
9.4
137
Quality of Support
8.0
129
9.3
201
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
20
9.6
116
Product Direction (% positive)
6.5
135
9.5
358
Features by Category
User Analysis
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.8
131
User Support
Not enough data
7.8
129
Not enough data
7.2
125
Not enough data
7.7
123
Walkthrough Type
Not enough data
8.4
129
Not enough data
9.0
130
Platform Basics - Digital Adoption Platform
Not enough data
8.8
30
Not enough data
8.9
30
Analytics - Digital Adoption Platform
Not enough data
8.8
29
Functions - Digital Adoption Platform
Not enough data
8.9
28
Not enough data
9.3
28
Agentic AI - Digital Adoption Platform
Not enough data
8.0
19
Automation Building
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Bot Management & Execution
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Intelligent Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Guide Options
Not enough data
8.6
232
Not enough data
8.8
231
Not enough data
8.3
222
Not enough data
8.1
224
Not enough data
8.5
226
Guide Tools
Not enough data
8.4
221
Not enough data
9.0
229
Not enough data
9.0
225
Not enough data
8.3
218
Access Options
Not enough data
7.6
210
Not enough data
7.9
216
Not enough data
8.3
210
Platform Basics
Not enough data
9.5
187
Not enough data
8.7
170
Not enough data
8.9
177
Platform Content
Not enough data
8.7
171
Not enough data
8.6
175
Not enough data
8.7
174
Platform Additional Functionality
Not enough data
8.7
180
Not enough data
8.3
167
Agentic AI - Screen and Video Capture
Not enough data
8.0
47
Systems Modeling
7.0
11
Not enough data
6.1
12
Not enough data
7.8
22
Not enough data
8.6
35
Not enough data
8.8
35
Not enough data
Requirements
7.9
24
Not enough data
7.9
25
Not enough data
8.0
23
Not enough data
Collaboration
7.9
25
Not enough data
6.4
20
Not enough data
Debugging
8.2
36
Not enough data
8.1
37
Not enough data
Customization - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data and Analytics - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Knowledge Base
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
LabVIEW and Tango share no categories
Unique Categories
LabVIEW is categorized as Systems Engineering And MBSE
Tango is categorized as AI Agent Builders, Work Instructions, Digital Adoption Platform, Screen and Video Capture, and Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
LabVIEW
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tango
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
10.9%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
10.4%
Research
9.8%
Higher Education
9.8%
Industrial Automation
7.7%
Other
51.4%
Computer Software
11.8%
Marketing and Advertising
8.0%
Primary/Secondary Education
6.2%
Education Management
6.2%
Information Technology and Services
5.6%
Other
62.2%
Discussions
How useful do you think labVIEW would be in programming and calibrating open source medical ventilators that are used for corona cases?
2 Comments
DK
LabVIEW is fabulous!! It is easy to use and many moons ago I used LabVIEW for a product called RespiCal which was a ventilator calibrator. It was sold by...Read more
Which language is used in LabVIEW?
2 Comments
AK
LabVIEW primarily uses a graphical programming language called G (or LabVIEW G). Instead of traditional text-based code, you create programs using a visual...Read more
What is LabVIEW used for?
2 Comments
AK
LabVIEW (Laboratory Virtual Instrument Engineering Workbench) is a system-design platform and development environment used primarily for data acquisition,...Read more
Tango has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
