Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GNU Octave and SolidWorks Simulation 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (49.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GNU Octave
Star Rating
(55)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GNU OctaveSolidWorks Simulation
Star Rating
(58)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (49.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SolidWorks SimulationSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GNU Octave excels in data visualization with a score of 8.9, making it a preferred choice for those needing robust graphical representations of data. In contrast, SolidWorks Simulation, while strong in finite element analysis, received a lower score of 8.4 in this area, indicating it may not be as effective for users focused on data visualization.
- Reviewers mention that SolidWorks Simulation shines in mechanical event simulation with a score of 8.6, which is higher than GNU Octave's score of 8.2. This suggests that users looking for advanced mechanical simulations may find SolidWorks more suitable for their needs.
- G2 users highlight the superior 3D/solid modeling tools in GNU Octave, scoring 9.5, compared to SolidWorks Simulation's 9.3. This indicates that users who prioritize solid modeling capabilities may prefer GNU Octave for its slightly better performance in this area.
- Users on G2 report that SolidWorks Simulation offers better editing tools, scoring 9.2 compared to GNU Octave's 8.2. This difference suggests that users who require extensive editing capabilities may find SolidWorks more advantageous.
- Reviewers mention that GNU Octave has a strong focus on statistical analysis tools, with high scores in ANOVA support (8.8) and regression (8.3), making it a better fit for users needing advanced statistical capabilities compared to SolidWorks Simulation.
- Users say that SolidWorks Simulation provides a more user-friendly experience with an ease of use score of 8.5, slightly higher than GNU Octave's 8.4. This indicates that those who prioritize ease of use may lean towards SolidWorks for a smoother onboarding experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GNU Octave
No pricing availableSolidWorks Simulation
No pricing availableFree Trial
GNU Octave
No trial information availableSolidWorks Simulation
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
43
8.3
41
Ease of Use
8.4
43
8.5
41
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.7
5
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.2
39
8.5
36
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
41
8.2
38
Features by Category
Administration
8.4
17
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
Capabilities
8.9
20
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
8.1
17
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
Methodology
8.8
13
Not enough data
8.3
19
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
9.5
10
9.1
21
8.3
11
9.0
20
8.2
10
9.0
21
8.2
10
8.1
20
Tools
8.5
11
8.1
19
8.3
11
8.3
21
8.2
10
8.6
18
Work
9.0
10
7.7
18
7.9
11
7.9
18
8.2
11
8.5
19
8.8
11
8.1
17
8.0
11
8.5
19
Environment
8.7
10
8.2
18
8.5
11
8.3
16
8.3
10
7.8
15
9.0
10
8.3
19
Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)Hide 18 FeaturesShow 18 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GNU Octave and SolidWorks Simulation are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
GNU Octave is categorized as Statistical Analysis
SolidWorks Simulation is categorized as Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GNU Octave
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SolidWorks Simulation
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Research
11.3%
Computer Software
11.3%
Information Technology and Services
5.7%
Higher Education
5.7%
Food Production
5.7%
Other
60.4%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
23.6%
Design
16.4%
Higher Education
12.7%
Oil & Energy
7.3%
Machinery
7.3%
Other
32.7%
Discussions
GNU Octave has no discussions with answers
What is the use of Solidworks software?
2 Comments
SS
Solidworks is a solid modelling tool that best describes it as a tool which can model the complex machine components and mechanisms.
Also Solidworks has a...Read more
SolidWorks Simulation has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
