Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GibbsCAM and SOLIDWORKS 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GibbsCAM
Star Rating
(22)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GibbsCAMSOLIDWORKS
Star Rating
(624)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SOLIDWORKSSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that SOLIDWORKS excels in overall user satisfaction, reflected in its higher G2 Score compared to GibbsCAM. Users appreciate its intuitive interface, which simplifies complex 3D modeling and assembly tasks, making it a favorite for both beginners and experienced designers.
- According to verified reviews, SOLIDWORKS has a significant advantage in the number of recent reviews, indicating a more active user base. This suggests that users are consistently engaging with the software, leading to ongoing improvements and updates that enhance productivity.
- Users say that SOLIDWORKS offers a robust set of features, particularly in parametric modeling and simulations. One user highlighted the ease of converting files from other CAD software, which boosts productivity, while others praised its sheet metal features for creating complex designs effortlessly.
- Reviewers mention that GibbsCAM shines in its ease of use for specific tasks, such as tool selection and operation sequencing. Users have noted the software's capability to simulate various machining processes, which allows for detailed parameter adjustments and enhances the overall machining experience.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while GibbsCAM has a slightly lower satisfaction score, it still provides strong support for CNC workflows and feature recognition. Users appreciate its ability to handle both 2D and 3D models effectively, making it a solid choice for those focused on machining processes.
- According to recent feedback, SOLIDWORKS is recognized for its strong product direction and ongoing improvements, with users feeling that it has been a reliable partner in their design processes. In contrast, GibbsCAM's lower score in this area suggests that users may have concerns about its future development and feature enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GibbsCAM
No pricing availableSOLIDWORKS
No pricing availableFree Trial
GibbsCAM
No trial information availableSOLIDWORKS
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
16
8.8
519
Ease of Use
9.2
16
8.6
523
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.2
95
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.9
46
Quality of Support
8.2
14
8.1
459
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.3
46
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
16
8.6
514
Features by Category
CAD to CAM
8.3
16
9.0
42
8.3
15
8.8
42
8.2
15
8.9
42
CNC Programming
9.0
13
8.7
38
8.7
15
8.6
38
8.6
16
8.4
37
Machining
9.0
15
8.6
39
8.8
15
8.7
39
8.9
15
8.8
39
Design
Not enough data
9.5
101
Not enough data
9.4
101
Not enough data
9.3
97
Not enough data
8.1
97
Edit
Not enough data
8.5
95
Not enough data
8.3
88
Not enough data
9.3
96
Not enough data
8.3
83
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.6
92
Not enough data
9.0
94
Not enough data
8.4
88
Library
Not enough data
8.9
28
Not enough data
8.5
27
Not enough data
8.4
28
Not enough data
8.6
23
CAD
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
9.4
30
Not enough data
9.1
29
Integration
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
9.6
28
Not enough data
8.5
24
Data
Not enough data
9.2
26
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
8.3
25
Not enough data
8.9
25
Not enough data
8.2
23
Not enough data
8.7
24
Logistics
Not enough data
9.1
25
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
8.8
60
Not enough data
8.6
46
Not enough data
8.4
51
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.6
54
Not enough data
8.6
59
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.6
48
Not enough data
8.8
57
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.7
47
Not enough data
8.6
52
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
6.1
19
Not enough data
6.1
19
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Options
Not enough data
8.9
44
Not enough data
9.1
43
Not enough data
9.0
42
Not enough data
9.3
44
Not enough data
8.3
35
Not enough data
8.3
41
Tools
Not enough data
9.5
43
Not enough data
9.1
41
Not enough data
9.2
43
Design
Not enough data
9.4
43
Design
Not enough data
7.9
12
Not enough data
7.8
12
Tools
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
8.7
13
Library
Not enough data
8.2
13
Platform
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
8.1
12
Customization
Not enough data
7.8
12
Not enough data
8.3
12
Design
Not enough data
9.2
59
Not enough data
9.0
60
Not enough data
8.8
60
Not enough data
7.6
58
Tools
Not enough data
8.0
53
Not enough data
7.9
55
Not enough data
7.4
48
Work
Not enough data
7.5
40
Not enough data
7.8
41
Not enough data
8.3
49
Not enough data
8.1
43
Not enough data
8.4
46
Environment
Not enough data
8.3
52
Not enough data
8.4
50
Not enough data
8.2
48
Not enough data
8.6
52
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
9.3
26
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
9.3
26
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
7.7
25
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.6
26
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
8.2
27
Not enough data
8.3
24
Not enough data
7.6
28
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
7.6
23
Not enough data
8.2
23
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
7.9
23
Not enough data
8.9
24
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GibbsCAM and SOLIDWORKS are categorized as Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM)
Unique Categories
GibbsCAM has no unique categories
SOLIDWORKS is categorized as Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD), General-Purpose CAD, Simulation & CAE, CAD Viewers, Sketching, PCB Design, CAD Libraries, CAD Data Exchange, and Additive Manufacturing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GibbsCAM
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SOLIDWORKS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Research
25.0%
Machinery
25.0%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
10.0%
Automotive
10.0%
Semiconductors
5.0%
Other
25.0%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
22.9%
Design
12.0%
Automotive
6.6%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.9%
Medical Devices
5.8%
Other
46.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is the best way to use this product
1 Comment
SG
CNC simulation and programmingRead more
GibbsCAM has no more discussions with answers
What is SOLIDWORKS used for?
3 Comments
YP
SOLIDWORKS IS USED FOR MULTIPLE WORK LIKE 2D & 3D CAD MODELING, ASSEMBLY MODELING, SHWWET METAL MODELING, SURFACE MODELING, RENDERING, SIMULATION, 3D...Read more
best use o this software
2 Comments
OS
Making 2D sketches and extruding them to make 3d sketches.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
