Users report that while both caterease and FoodStorm offer solid billing and invoicing features, caterease scores an 8.0, which is decent, but FoodStorm excels with a rating of 9.4, indicating a more streamlined and user-friendly invoicing process.
Reviewers mention that the ease of setup is a significant differentiator; caterease has a low score of 5.2, suggesting a complicated onboarding process, whereas FoodStorm shines with an 8.9, making it easier for new users to get started quickly.
G2 users highlight that FoodStorm's quality of support is notably superior, with a score of 9.4 compared to caterease's 7.2, indicating that users feel more supported and valued when using FoodStorm.
Users on G2 report that caterease's venue calendar feature is rated highly at 9.5, which is a strong point for event management, while FoodStorm's facilities management feature, rated at 8.9, is also robust but slightly less impressive in comparison.
Reviewers mention that FoodStorm's product direction is rated at 8.9, indicating a positive outlook for future updates and features, while caterease's lower score of 6.4 suggests some concerns about its ongoing development and innovation.
Users say that both platforms offer customer database features, but FoodStorm's score of 8.5 indicates a more comprehensive and user-friendly experience compared to caterease's 8.3, which may lack some advanced functionalities that users desire.
FoodStorm is used by grocers to manage their order ahead, prepared foods and catering operations. FoodStorm allows grocery customers to place orders online...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.