Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Aladtec by TCP and First Due

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Aladtec by TCP
Aladtec by TCP
Star Rating
(95)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.7% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Aladtec by TCP
First Due
First Due
Star Rating
(39)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (51.4% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about First Due
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that TCP Aladtec Scheduling excels in "Shift Scheduling" with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for organizations needing efficient scheduling solutions. In contrast, First Due, while offering solid features, does not match this level of performance in shift management.
  • Reviewers mention that First Due shines in "Quality of Support" with a score of 9.6, indicating a strong commitment to customer service. Users on G2 have noted that TCP Aladtec Scheduling, although good, has slightly lower support ratings at 9.0, suggesting that First Due may provide a more responsive support experience.
  • G2 users highlight the "Performance Reporting" feature in TCP Aladtec Scheduling, which received an impressive score of 9.7, indicating robust capabilities in generating insightful reports. First Due, however, scored lower at 8.1, suggesting that its reporting features may not be as comprehensive or user-friendly.
  • Reviewers say that TCP Aladtec Scheduling offers superior "Employee Management" features with a score of 9.2, which is particularly beneficial for small businesses looking to streamline their workforce operations. In contrast, First Due's employee management capabilities received a lower score of 6.5, indicating potential limitations in this area.
  • Users report that First Due excels in "Geospatial Mapping" with a score of 8.9, which is crucial for emergency response scenarios. TCP Aladtec Scheduling, while offering valuable features, scored lower in this category, suggesting that First Due may be better suited for organizations that prioritize geographic data in their operations.
  • Reviewers mention that both platforms have similar scores for "Ease of Use" at 8.6, indicating that users find both products relatively user-friendly. However, TCP Aladtec Scheduling has a slight edge in "Ease of Setup" with a score of 8.5 compared to First Due's 7.9, suggesting a smoother onboarding process for new users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Aladtec by TCP
No pricing available
First Due
No pricing available
Free Trial
Aladtec by TCP
No trial information available
First Due
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
75
8.8
37
Ease of Use
8.5
80
8.4
37
Ease of Setup
8.4
60
7.9
34
Ease of Admin
8.7
63
8.3
26
Quality of Support
9.1
76
9.2
36
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.1
62
9.0
26
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
81
9.4
37
Features by Category
Emergency Medical ServicesHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
7.6
19
Emergency Response
Feature Not Available
7.6
19
Feature Not Available
8.9
19
Feature Not Available
7.7
19
Data Management
Feature Not Available
6.9
18
Feature Not Available
8.2
18
Business Operations
Feature Not Available
6.1
19
Feature Not Available
7.4
19
8.6
38
Not enough data
Platform Basics
8.9
20
Not enough data
8.7
37
Not enough data
8.8
36
Not enough data
Platform Content
8.9
16
Not enough data
8.2
13
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
Platform Additional Functionality
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.7
37
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
17
Not enough data
8.8
44
Not enough data
Platform
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.1
19
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.3
33
Not enough data
9.4
30
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.9
31
Not enough data
8.9
32
Not enough data
Workforce Management Platform Features
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.2
34
Not enough data
9.1
32
Not enough data
9.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
24
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
28
Not enough data
8.5
32
Not enough data
8.6
28
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Aladtec by TCP
Aladtec by TCP
First Due
First Due
Aladtec by TCP and First Due are categorized as Fire Department and Emergency Medical Services
Unique Categories
Aladtec by TCP
Aladtec by TCP is categorized as Workforce Management and Employee Scheduling
First Due
First Due has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Aladtec by TCP
Aladtec by TCP
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
53.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
43.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
3.2%
First Due
First Due
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
51.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
45.9%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
2.7%
Reviewers' Industry
Aladtec by TCP
Aladtec by TCP
Public Safety
31.6%
Law Enforcement
15.8%
Hospital & Health Care
13.7%
Government Administration
9.5%
Medical Practice
4.2%
Other
25.3%
First Due
First Due
Public Safety
70.3%
Government Administration
18.9%
Hospital & Health Care
5.4%
Law Enforcement
2.7%
Computer & Network Security
2.7%
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Aladtec by TCP
Aladtec by TCP Alternatives
UKG Ready
UKG Ready
Add UKG Ready
Paycom
Paycom
Add Paycom
Deputy
Deputy
Add Deputy
Connecteam
Connecteam
Add Connecteam
First Due
First Due Alternatives
Everbridge 360 (Critical Event Management)
Everbridge 360 (Critical Event Management)
Add Everbridge 360 (Critical Event Management)
D4H
D4H
Add D4H
ImageTrend
ImageTrend
Add ImageTrend
ESO Fire RMS
ESO Fire RMS
Add ESO Fire RMS
Discussions
Aladtec by TCP
Aladtec by TCP Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Aladtec by TCP has no discussions with answers
First Due
First Due Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
First Due has no discussions with answers