When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Mura CMS easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Mura CMS overall.
Reviewers felt that Mura CMS meets the needs of their business better than Contentful.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Contentful is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Mura CMS over Contentful.
Deliver content-driven experiences to the web, mobile, applications, and more. Go coupled (traditional), decoupled, or headless.
Mura is fast and flexible for developers, easy to use for everyone else.
You can do dynamic validation on anything, but it would require that you wrap the open source contentful field editors with your own javascript validation...Read more
What is Contentful used for?
1 Comment
D
Managing the content of the application in the cloud whether its Mobile App or Website Read more
Do I need to find a "Mura developer" to be successful with Mura?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mura CMS
No.
Mura supports web standards in HTML and CSS, including Bootstrap 4 and Foundation (or whatever you prefer), as well as common Javascript frameworks...Read more
Are there any plans to drop CK Editor?
1 Comment
TW
That is a question for Matt and team at blueriver
https://getmura.com/contact/
but there is also an active google groupRead more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.