Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cisco Workload Optimization Manager and JAMS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Astro by Astronomer
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RunMyJobs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (47.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$9,996.00 Per Year
Cisco Workload Optimization Manager
Star Rating
(10)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Cisco Workload Optimization ManagerJAMS
Star Rating
(218)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$9,996.00 Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that JAMS Enterprise Job Scheduler excels in job scheduling capabilities, with a score of 9.4, while Cisco Workload Optimization Manager falls short at 7.0. Reviewers mention that JAMS offers a more intuitive interface for setting up and managing jobs, making it easier for teams to automate their workflows.
- Reviewers mention that JAMS provides superior quality of support, scoring 9.5 compared to Cisco's 7.8. Users on G2 highlight the responsiveness and helpfulness of JAMS' support team, which is crucial for businesses that rely on timely assistance for their job scheduling needs.
- G2 users indicate that JAMS has a more favorable product direction, with a score of 9.4, while Cisco's score is only 6.1. Users say that JAMS frequently updates its features based on user feedback, ensuring that the software evolves to meet changing business requirements.
- Users report that JAMS offers better intelligent automation features, scoring 8.6 compared to Cisco's 8.7. Reviewers mention that JAMS' automation capabilities allow for more complex workflows, which can significantly reduce manual intervention and improve efficiency.
- Reviewers mention that JAMS has a more user-friendly administration console, scoring 8.4, which simplifies the management of workflows and job scheduling. In contrast, Cisco's administration features are perceived as less intuitive, making it harder for users to navigate and manage their workloads effectively.
- Users on G2 highlight that JAMS provides robust error alerts, scoring 8.8, which helps teams quickly identify and resolve issues. In comparison, Cisco's error management features are seen as less effective, leading to potential delays in addressing workload problems.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cisco Workload Optimization Manager
No pricing availableJAMS
Core
$9,996.00
Per Year
Perfect for small teams getting started with automation.
Core Integrations: PowerShell, SQL, Azure Data Factory, Python, & 20+ others.
- Full IT and data orchestration
- Cross-platform job scheduling
- Advanced workflow automation
Free Trial
Cisco Workload Optimization Manager
No trial information availableJAMS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
7.5
6
9.0
170
Ease of Use
6.9
6
8.6
172
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.5
137
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.6
109
Quality of Support
7.8
6
9.3
165
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.2
108
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
6
9.2
165
Features by Category
Automation
8.7
5
8.9
149
Not enough data
8.9
134
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Administration
Not enough data
8.5
144
8.0
5
8.5
131
Not enough data
8.4
117
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
79
Not enough data
8.9
74
Functionality
7.0
5
9.3
140
Not enough data
8.4
111
Not enough data
8.1
73
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
Not enough data
6.4
15
Not enough data
6.8
16
Not enough data
6.7
15
Not enough data
6.8
15
Not enough data
6.4
15
Not enough data
6.3
14
Not enough data
6.9
14
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cisco Workload Optimization Manager and JAMS are categorized as Workload Automation
Unique Categories
Cisco Workload Optimization Manager has no unique categories
JAMS has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cisco Workload Optimization Manager
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
JAMS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Photography
11.1%
Pharmaceuticals
11.1%
Information Technology and Services
11.1%
Higher Education
11.1%
Government Administration
11.1%
Other
44.4%
Financial Services
16.7%
Information Technology and Services
7.9%
Insurance
7.0%
Banking
4.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.2%
Other
59.5%
Discussions
Cisco Workload Optimization Manager has no discussions with answers
Can JAMS convert my existing batch jobs?
2 Comments
Official Response from JAMS
Yes. Conversion utilities for Windows Task Scheduler, SQL Server Agent, and Cron are included with JAMS.Read more
How to hold schedules of all the jobs ?
2 Comments
AC
JAMS has the option to use jobs to execute other jobs in a specific order, which allows you to hold schedules for all jobs.Read more
What is a JAMS Job?
2 Comments
RG
A JAMS job is a definition for a task to be performed. It can be triggered by the appearance of a file at a certain location, an email receipt, a date/time...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
