Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Buffer and FeedHive 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cloud Campaign
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Planable
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (95.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
$19.00 Per Month
Buffer
Star Rating
(1,023)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansFeedHive
Star Rating
(172)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (95.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$19.00 Per Month
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Buffer excels in its "Social Publishing" feature, scoring 9.3, which allows for seamless scheduling across multiple platforms, while FeedHive follows closely with a score of 9.2, indicating strong performance but slightly less flexibility in scheduling options.
- Reviewers mention that Buffer's "Social Analytics" feature, with a score of 7.9, could use improvement, as some users find it less comprehensive compared to FeedHive's 8.3 rating, which offers more detailed insights into engagement metrics.
- G2 users highlight that Buffer's "Content Calendar" feature is highly rated at 9.2, providing a clear visual layout for planning, whereas FeedHive's similar feature scores slightly higher at 9.3, suggesting a more user-friendly interface for content scheduling.
- Users on G2 note that both platforms have similar scores for "Users and Permissions" at 8.8, indicating that both Buffer and FeedHive provide robust options for managing team access and roles effectively.
- Reviewers say that Buffer's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.5, which some users find lacking in responsiveness, while FeedHive shines with a score of 9.2, with many users praising their quick and helpful customer service.
- Users report that FeedHive's "Campaign Optimization" feature, scoring 8.5, is particularly effective in helping users refine their strategies, while Buffer's score of 8.4 suggests it may not offer the same level of detailed guidance for campaign adjustments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Buffer
Free
Free
For individuals and businesses getting started with social media.
- 3 social accounts
- Publish to Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn, Google Business Profiles, Mastodon, Pinterest and Bluesky
- 10 scheduled posts per social account
FeedHive
Creator
$19.00
Per Month
Best for individual content creators.
- 4 socials
- Posting plan
- Analytics
Free Trial
Buffer
Free Trial is available
FeedHive
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
900
8.8
132
Ease of Use
9.2
906
9.4
138
Ease of Setup
9.2
325
9.1
71
Ease of Admin
9.1
309
9.2
64
Quality of Support
8.5
644
9.1
121
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
269
9.2
61
Product Direction (% positive)
8.2
880
9.3
125
Features by Category
Content & Collaboration
9.0
142
9.3(won by 0.3)
109
8.6(won by 0.1)
125
8.5
105
8.2(won by default)
105
Feature Not Available
8.6(won by 0.4)
106
8.2
93
8.8(won by 0.1)
115
8.7
98
8.5
99
8.7(won by 0.2)
105
Social Management
7.9
666
8.2(won by 0.3)
105
9.3(won by 0.2)
787
9.1
110
8.4(tied score)
642
8.4(tied score)
97
8.3
693
8.4(won by 0.1)
105
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
8.6(won by 0.1)
99
8.5
100
8.3(won by 0.4)
25
7.9
16
Agentic AI - Social Media Management
7.2(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.4(won by default)
12
Not enough data
6.9(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.4(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.2(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.5(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.2(won by default)
12
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Buffer and FeedHive are categorized as Social Media Management
Unique Categories
Buffer has no unique categories
FeedHive has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Buffer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
FeedHive
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Marketing and Advertising
23.1%
Computer Software
7.3%
Information Technology and Services
6.3%
Internet
5.3%
Non-Profit Organization Management
4.2%
Other
53.8%
Marketing and Advertising
30.2%
Computer Software
13.0%
Information Technology and Services
8.3%
Internet
3.6%
Design
3.6%
Other
41.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
Can I have tabs open for multiple companies at a time?
4 Comments
MM
I have one Buffer account with multiple clients on that one account, so I just click on which platform/client I want to work on within that (so just one...Read more
Which platforms are next on the Buffer integration roadmap?
2 Comments
GP
Buffer has a new feature to offer: Shop Grid.
It is a landing page made specifically for your Instagram profile, where you can direct people back to your...Read more
LinkedIn workarounds
2 Comments
ED
When a data source like Facebook or LinkedIn removes an API (the way the data is shared from their warehouse to someone else’s, like Buffer’s, and the way...Read more
What is FeedHive used for?
1 Comment
AA
FeedHive is a social media management tool. It is used to create, organize, and post content to various social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram etc.Read more
FeedHive has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
