When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Slackware easier to use and set up. However, reviewers felt that administration of both products was equally easy, and preferred doing business with Arch overall.
Reviewers felt that Arch meets the needs of their business better than Slackware.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Arch is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Arch over Slackware.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Arch
No pricing available
Slackware
No pricing available
Free Trial
Arch
No trial information available
Slackware
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
24
8.8
24
Ease of Use
6.7
25
7.6
24
Ease of Setup
5.4
13
7.6
17
Ease of Admin
7.9
8
7.9
14
Quality of Support
7.8
22
7.7
22
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Arch Linux is one of the lightest Linux distribution available in the market.Read more
Does Arch use RPM or Deb?
1 Comment
HC
NO Arch Linux, as a rolling release distribution, utilizes its own package management system called "pacman" (Package Manager) rather than relying on either...Read more
To me, that's the best choice. I wanted to spread it as much as I could, even installed it on my sis's notebook knowing she's too far from IT. Slackware is...Read more
what is the best way to have OS selection Startup with slackware on the list ?
1 Comment
MZ
lilo if your bios support it or uefi ... Read more
Is Slackware still relevant 2020?
1 Comment
MM
It is relevant. However, it will depend on your use case. For instance, application service providers/vendors will indicate which distribution of Linux their...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.