CentOS Reviews & Product Details

Stability is undoubtedly the most striking feature of CentOS. In a production environment, several factors are important, but the main ones are stability and security. CentOS is an operating system that brings both, allowing us to focus on our business without needing a large team to take care of stability. The initial installation and configuration process was very smooth and simple, with excellent documentation and community support as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest problem with CentOS is that it was discontinued in 2024, replaced by CentOS Stream, which caused a disruption in the stability and philosophy of the original project. I would also like critical package updates to be maintained for a few more years. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Stability and reliability are key strengths here. This platform offers a consistent, enterprise-grade environment that is ideal for servers. Its extended support cycles, robust security features, and compatibility with RHEL make it a strong option for production systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a hosting provider, my main concern with CentOS is the uncertainty that arose after the transition to CentOS Stream. Moving away from a stable, fixed-release model to a rolling-release system has made it more difficult to plan for the long term and maintain predictable server management. For production environments that demand consistent stability, this change has forced us to spend extra time evaluating other options and rethinking our infrastructure strategy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I used to use CentOS to host my servers and found it to be a very stable distribution with very few hiccups. I appreciate its stability and reliability, which I think are absolutely mandatory for a server. Another aspect I liked is that it's basically RHEL, which I know is battle-tested. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't like how CentOS is deprecated. The operating system was discontinued a few years back, and there is no support now, so it ideally shouldn't be used. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

CentOS is stable and reliable. It inherits RHEL's stability which is ideal for enterprise solutions where uptime and consistency is critical. It is an open source OS which is a cost effective option for business. It is easy to use and implement. It has a very good customer support options. It is easy to integrate and run to any systems with ease. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It has limited commercial support unlike RHEL. It doesn't offer latest features as it prioritizes stability over cutting edge features. Finding latest libraries may be a challenge. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that CentOS is stable and reliable for long-term use. It doesn’t break after updates, and it runs smoothly even on older hardware. It’s easy to manage once you get used to it and works well for servers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only downside is that updates and newer packages arrive slower compared to other distros. Sometimes I need to add extra repos to get recent software, which can be a bit inconvenient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

CentOS provides enterprise-level stability and performance without licensing fees. Its compatibility with Red Hat Enterprise Linux makes it perfect for production environments. I like how predictable and secure it is—once set up, it just works, with minimal maintenance. It’s my go-to OS for servers due to its reliability and strong community support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main downside of CentOS is the sudden shift in its support model with the move to CentOS Stream, which created uncertainty for long-term users. It disrupted the trust many had in its stability for production use. Additionally, software packages are often older compared to other distributions, which can be limiting for newer tech stacks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the solidity of CentOS and the collaborative community. I also appreciate that its initial setup is easy thanks to its GNOME base. Additionally, I use a very popular Linux stack, including LAMP, Apache, and MySQL, which I value a lot. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main support stopped working and only the user community provides support, but it recommends switching to a different operating system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The package manager and dependency handler work well, and there is also support for various build tools. I am able to use it frequently to integrate multiple components. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Shipping packages is challenging, and at times, certain logs in the daemons unexpectedly stop working without any warning. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like CentOS for its uncompromising focus on enterprise-grade reliability and RHEL compatibility without the cost tag, paired with features that make it a workhorse for stable, low-fuss server environments. Relatively speaking, its initial setup is quite simple. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't like the lack of a predictable 10-year stability in CentOS. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's powerful. Very stable. It's easy to deploy. Very low maintenance required. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's similar to Red Hat but different from Ubuntu which we used before. So there is a bit of learning needed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.