Users report that TimeCamp excels in ease of use with a score of 9.2, making it simple for teams to adopt and integrate into their workflows, while ActivTrak, with a score of 8.5, has been noted to have a steeper learning curve.
Reviewers mention that TimeCamp's time tracking capabilities, particularly the "Ease of Completing Timesheets" feature, received high praise with a score of 9.2, whereas ActivTrak's time tracking features are perceived as less intuitive, scoring 8.8.
G2 users highlight TimeCamp's superior customer support, scoring 9.2, which is often cited as a key factor in user satisfaction, while ActivTrak's support, with a score of 8.8, is considered good but not as responsive.
Users on G2 report that TimeCamp's "Tracking Time to Project/Task" feature is particularly effective, scoring 9.4, which helps teams manage their projects efficiently, while ActivTrak's project tracking features are seen as less robust.
Reviewers say that TimeCamp's automation features, particularly in "Process Automation," scored 7.4, which is a notable area for improvement compared to ActivTrak, which lacks similar automation capabilities.
Users report that TimeCamp's reporting features, especially the "Dashboards & Reporting" functionality, scored 7.8, providing valuable insights, while ActivTrak's reporting capabilities, although decent, are perceived as less comprehensive.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.